[trappedincanuckistan]

“You seem to forget that Zimmerman had not observed any crime and had no reason to leave his car and follow Martin in the first place.”

You are the one getting it twisted. Zimmerman reported Martin acting suspiciously, and left his vehicle to maintain visual contact so that police could find Martin when they arrived. There is no law against “leaving your vehicle”, and any reason for doing so does not have to be approved of by Rooivalk.

[Rooivalk]

You are the one getting it twisted. Zimmerman reported Martin acting suspiciously, and left his vehicle to maintain visual contact so that police could find Martin when they arrived.

Sadly you grasp at straws to support your position. Just what did "acting suspiciously" mean to Zimmerman? Were you there that night? At least tell me the crime in progress Zimmerman observed that supports his actions.

All we have is Zimmerman's self serving account of someone "acting suspiciously" as his rational for encountering someone walking down the street

Is that the best you Zimmerman supporters can come up with?

There is no law against “leaving your vehicle”, and any reason for doing so does not have to be approved of by Rooivalk.

Shooting and killing an unarmed person because in your mind, they were "acting suspiciously", sure is against the law.

Again tell me what crime was Zimmerman observing when he left his car to accost Martin. Give that a try.

But we both know you have no answer for that. None of you Zimmerman supporters have that answer