Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local 6 legal expert Mark O'Mara now representing George Zimmerman
Local 6 Orlando ^ | April 11th, 2012 | Local 6 Orlando

Posted on 04/11/2012 4:43:02 PM PDT by Third Person

ORLANDO, Fla. -

Attorney Mark O'Mara, who was a legal expert for Local 6 in the Casey Anthony murder trial and the ongoing Trayvon Martin death investigation, is now representing George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who shot and killed the teen in Sanford.

Zimmerman was charged Wednesday with second-degree murder in Martin's death.

O'Mara said Zimmerman will plead not guilty.

"I'm expecting a lot of work and hopefully justice in the end," said O'Mara, who added that Zimmerman is OK but concerned about his future. "He's frightened."

O'Mara said he spoke to Zimmerman on the phone earlier in the day.

"He is troubled by everything that has happened, and I can’t imagine living in Geroge Zimmerman's shoes for the past number of weeks, only because he has been the focus of anger, confusion and hatred, and that has to be difficult," O'Mara said.

O'Mara, who's been practicing law for 30 years, said he's tried "stand your ground" cases in the past but added that he has a lot of work to do in this case.

"Quite honestly, I have not been involved in the case very long. I probably know as much as the media does, if not less," he said. "My hope is that the judge will grant a bond and that it is a bond the family can make."

Zimmerman's former attorneys, Craig Sonner and Hal Uhrig, announced Tuesday they were stepping down from the case because they had not had any contact with Zimmerman since Sunday.

Second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of life in prison and is typically charged when there is a fight or other confrontation that results in death and where there is no premeditated plan to kill someone.

Watch Local 6 for more on this story.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: trayvonmartin
Just finished watching his presser. BIG upgrade from the last couple of clowns. He will present a stark contrast to the sensationalist prosecution. Hopefully the facts and a heavy-hitter defense attorney will lead to an acquittal.
1 posted on 04/11/2012 4:43:08 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Those other ones were clowns. Glad he got what appears to be a decent atty.


2 posted on 04/11/2012 4:45:40 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

>>George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who shot and killed the teen in Sanford.<<

If he needs money, Zimmerman should scour the newspapers for this kind of statement.

Without “alleged” or “accused” it is libel — black letter law. And he should sue now.

I hope his lawyer is paying attention, keeping score, and taking names.


3 posted on 04/11/2012 4:46:46 PM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Attorney Mark O’Mara, who was a legal expert for Local 6-————

a legal expert for a ‘news’ station.

Doesn’t instill confidence in me.


4 posted on 04/11/2012 4:47:12 PM PDT by Freddd (No PA Engineers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

The wild card here is that Zimmerman is said to have had a personal conversation with Corey with no lawyer present - a big no,no.

If he said something stupid in a less than clear frame of mind he could be screwed.


5 posted on 04/11/2012 4:49:27 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

The press conference just ended and the video of the presser has not been posted yet.

Watch it if becomes available... Zimmerman has retained someone several notches above his previous representation.


6 posted on 04/11/2012 4:54:07 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

If Zimmerman was a liberal democrat, I’m sure he’s shaken to the core now to see himself on the other end of certain groups’ treatment of him.


7 posted on 04/11/2012 4:58:27 PM PDT by paudio (no tagline for now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd
a legal expert for a ‘news’ station. Doesn’t instill confidence in me.

Come on! It's shaping up to be like the plot of a Tom Wolfe novel! Imagine the ratings!

This is going to be bigger than the internet.

8 posted on 04/11/2012 4:58:34 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I think in about 5 - no, 4 - years I'll have had enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

“The wild card here is that Zimmerman is said to have had a personal conversation with Corey with no lawyer present - a big no,no.”

It is a huge no-no, but one which can cut both ways, depending on the specifics.


9 posted on 04/11/2012 4:58:55 PM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

And now the Circus begins.

And.

While no one is looking Zero sets fire to the tent.


10 posted on 04/11/2012 5:01:08 PM PDT by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
"The wild card here is that Zimmerman is said to have had a personal conversation with Corey with no lawyer present - a big no,no."

Wouldn't it be great if he wasn't "Merandized" with that conversation?

This is a "high tech lynching" that's going on, anyway, just to appease the black population. If he's found "Not Guilty", you can see the Rodney King verdict reaction, multiplied IMMENSELY occurring.

11 posted on 04/11/2012 5:08:27 PM PDT by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Third Person; All
Here is the lawyer's website:

http://www.markomaralaw.com/

I wonder if he will take direct donations for Zimmerman's case? I'd be down.

We must win this one. For the America we knew. If Zimmerman loses, America will experience another civil war.

12 posted on 04/11/2012 5:14:50 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
No kidding. It's unethical for the Prosecutor to consent to a personal conversation with a person they are about to file charges against.
13 posted on 04/11/2012 5:15:51 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

That’s right, no `person of interest’ or `alleged,’ just statements that he was the killer and strongly suggesting that it was an unjustified or unexcused shooting.
And I’m starting to think Treyvon Martin’s first name is Unarmed.


14 posted on 04/11/2012 5:19:52 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Is O’Mara also friends with Joe Oliver?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2870911/posts


15 posted on 04/11/2012 5:27:55 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Does a second degree murder charge mean the state thinks Zimmerman assaulted Martin and initiated the fight? Doesn’t he have to be the aggressor to get second degree murder?


16 posted on 04/11/2012 5:30:59 PM PDT by peeps36 (America is being destroyed by filthy traitors in the political establishment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
No kidding. It's unethical for the Prosecutor to consent to a personal conversation with a person they are about to file charges against.

Sheesh! it was only yesterday that the line was she was a bitch for refusing to take his phone call when he wanted to put his side to her.

17 posted on 04/11/2012 5:34:30 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
It's unethical for the Prosecutor to consent to a personal conversation with a person they are about to file charges against.

I really don’t think that’s how it works. It would be unethical for a prosecutor to bring a suspect in for a meeting or questioning and deny that person the right to have council present. However if the person comes in to talk to the prosecutor on their own volition and has already been Marandized or otherwise informed of their right to have their lawyer present and or their lawyer has previously advised them not to talk to the police or prosecutor without their presence, then the prosecutor has done nothing “unethical”.

18 posted on 04/11/2012 5:40:29 PM PDT by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Perhaps. Oliver did do an interview with Local 6 recently:

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Friend-George-Zimmerman-scared-for-his-life/-/1637132/9722180/-/e55273z/-/index.html

In the FR thread you linked to, it says that Oliver reached out to the first attorney, Craig Sonner, on Zimmerman’s behalf.


19 posted on 04/11/2012 5:40:43 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

I don’t think Zimmerman has a chance unless the judge gives a directed verdict. Just wait and see. What is every defendant guaranteed in this country? A trial by a jury of his peers. Dollars to donuts the jury will be made up of a jury of Trayvon’s peers.


20 posted on 04/11/2012 5:43:30 PM PDT by Krankor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

He could also walk... He had a bounty on his head from an organization that had gotten preferential treatment from our Federal AG... Nothing would be admissible.

Even that doesn’t matter.... How does a broken nose and and eye witness not establish an impenetrable self defense case?


21 posted on 04/11/2012 5:46:13 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Let the justice system work. Hopefully all the facts will come out, and a right decision will be rendered by a good jury.

I am sorry Zimmerman has to go through this if he is innocent. But a man was killed and it is important to know whether the shooting was justified or not.


22 posted on 04/11/2012 5:57:59 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

He should have retained Jose Baez to be his lawyer. Imagine what that trial would look like.


23 posted on 04/11/2012 5:58:18 PM PDT by dwg2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

“. How does a broken nose and and eye witness not establish an impenetrable self defense case?”

If I were on the jury, I’d like to know if Trayvon hitting Zimmerman and banging his head on the sidewalk (assuming the witness states this in the trial) was due to Trayvon defending himself - for instance if Zimmerman had jumped on Trayvon or brandished his gun at him or something.

They’d have to prove the beyond a reasonable doubt for me to convict Zimmerman of anything. But the damage Zimmerman sustained is not PROOF that it was ok for him to shoot him. It does support him, but that’s all.


24 posted on 04/11/2012 6:02:05 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

His lawyer won’t allow that.


25 posted on 04/11/2012 6:38:59 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

“Let the justice system work. Hopefully all the facts will come out, and a right decision will be rendered by a good jury.”

yeah, just like the OJ trial....


26 posted on 04/11/2012 6:57:03 PM PDT by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

There will definitely need to be a change of venue for this trial. Of course the race baiters will want a majority of African Americans on the jury..quite the opposite of the OJ Simpson trial.


27 posted on 04/11/2012 7:02:25 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

How does the prosecution prove that Zimmerman initiated a violent altercation? That’s going to be tough.


28 posted on 04/11/2012 7:13:02 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
"Without “alleged” or “accused” it is libel — black letter law. And he should sue now."

Except for the fact that in this case, Zimmerman provided a statement to police acknowledging that he did shoot Martin.

29 posted on 04/11/2012 7:17:49 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Third Person
Just finished watching his presser.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U_EjqOUlWU

30 posted on 04/11/2012 7:21:26 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

>>Except for the fact that in this case, Zimmerman provided a statement to police acknowledging that he did shoot Martin.<<

I hadn’t heard that. Yes, it changes things.


31 posted on 04/11/2012 7:34:55 PM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
The wild card here is that Zimmerman is said to have had a personal conversation with Corey with no lawyer present - a big no,no.

His previous lawyers also said that Corey flatly refused to speak with him without his lawyers present, and they praised her for that.

32 posted on 04/11/2012 7:43:54 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

“How does the prosecution prove that Zimmerman initiated a violent altercation? That’s going to be tough.”

The only way I can think of is with a credible eyewitness or a video of some kind.

Otherwise, the presumption of innocence has to prevail. We can’t presume him guilty. As a juror, that would be my reasoning. I’d need to have good reason to believe that Zimmerman assaulted Martin first.


33 posted on 04/11/2012 11:13:45 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

“yeah, just like the OJ trial....”

I thought it was looking bad for OJ until those gloves didn’t fit. I think that’s what turned it. But who knows.

Anyway, in that case, a man was acquitted of murder. I think Zimmerman should be, too, unless there is some big evidence we don’t know about.


34 posted on 04/11/2012 11:15:06 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson