Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is an Obama dictatorship in the air?
WND ^ | April 11, 2012 | Robert Ringer

Posted on 04/11/2012 6:51:41 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

SNIP

If polls indicate that Obama is going to win the upcoming election, no problem. He’ll keep flashing that fake Barry Obama grin until Nov. 7, then move swiftly to begin unleashing a dictatorial full monty – consisting of more regulations, higher taxes and less freedom – that will shock all but his staunchest Marxist allies.

Nothing will be off limits – a national police force, instant citizenship for all Third World people who want to come to America, forced equalization of income (except for Obama’s wealthy supporters), widespread use of tax audits to carry out vendettas against enemies of his administration, a virtual end to oil drilling, coal mining and gas exploration, suspension of habeas corpus, a new sedition act that will make it a crime to speak out against the government, the police, or the military … and much, much more.

On the other hand, two or three months before the election, if the polls clearly show that Obama is going to go down in defeat, I believe there’s better than a 50-50 chance of a major “emergency” coincidentally making its appearance, convincingly manufactured in such a way as to cause the average entitlement junkie to agree that we must rally around the president and “postpone” the November elections.

Americans who find it difficult to break free of their normalcy bias should think about F. A. Hayek’s explanation, in “The Road to Serfdom,” of how countries travel the road leading from democracy to dictatorship:

"Hitler did not have to destroy democracy; he merely took advantage of the decay of democracy and at the critical moment obtained the support of many to whom, though they detested Hitler, he yet seemed the only man strong enough to get things done."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama

1 posted on 04/11/2012 6:51:47 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

PETITION URGING CONGRESS TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY

http://www.wnd.com/wnd_petition/petition-urging-congress-to-investigate-obamas-eligibility/

+19,000 Petition Signers


2 posted on 04/11/2012 6:53:23 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I have been saying this for over two years. I believe he will get a race war going, suspend the Constitution and declare himself the leader we need in these trying times.

I have been called every nasty name from “idiot” to “tin foil”. Join me.

That is why he is so easy going/confident lately.


3 posted on 04/11/2012 7:05:33 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat
That is why he is so easy going/confident ....

So was Mussolini

4 posted on 04/11/2012 7:15:09 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

Race war, class war, war between women and men. He may even start a war with Iran and declare a national emergency. I look to Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot to get a gauge on what 0bama might do now and after.


5 posted on 04/11/2012 7:16:40 PM PDT by MtnClimber (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth. —Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

We’ve witnessed things that in the past were unthinkable before 2008.

I put NOTHING past this cabal.


6 posted on 04/11/2012 7:17:17 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Considering how he looks I think he has AIDS. He sure looks skinnier than before, even the media has noticed.http://thesop.org/story/20110104/is-president-obama-sick-obama-looks-like-a-skeleton.html


7 posted on 04/11/2012 7:33:19 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The only way would be if he gets elected for a second term and then declares elections over until things get under control, his control. If he goes for a continued presidency then .....


8 posted on 04/11/2012 7:35:19 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
I have heard several hard core leftists say that they wish
he could simply dictate and not have to bother with all of
the “hate” and “partisanship” that is keeping him from doing
what they think is right. They seem incredibly naive to
think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of
no one who I would allow to have such power.
9 posted on 04/11/2012 7:38:18 PM PDT by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Obama is finishing the job of concentrating federal power that FDR started, and LBJ propagated. Maybe the marxists in fedgov monster see an opportunity to seize more power, and are going for it.
10 posted on 04/11/2012 7:47:03 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Oh for cripes sake, can people give this a rest? Dictator Obama? Most he'd ever dictate is taking yet another month long vacation or yet another mid week party. He is the laziest pres(id)ent ever. And seriously, who in Washington will cede their power to him? No one will.

I'm sick and tired of this stupid strawman to try to make the liberal Romney seem appealing. Name one thing Obama has worked for in his entire life - you can't. He even had to be dragged on the campaign trail. Romney on the other hand worked hard to be the governor of a liberal state, worked hard to gather all the credit for the Olympics, and has worked everyday for six years for this run at the White House. He even worked hard at the same time to join the Quorum of the 70 in the LDS church.

Romney will doom this nation. Period. The GOP takeover by the liberals will be complete, and we'll spend four years tearing out our hair as liberal agenda item after agenda item will be ticked off the list, just like Romney did in MA.

I will never vote for Romney. My vote belongs to me, not a party.

11 posted on 04/11/2012 7:57:19 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Inside every socialist lives a latent tyrant.

Tyranny is a requisite corellary to socialism. It precedes from a presumption of superiority and, thus, the ability to make decisions for others. However, often those others don't subscribe to the presumption.

Therefore, it follows that coercion will be a necessary component of the process.

If you observe closely, you will discover that every committed leftist would be comfortable with a dictatorship -- so long as it is "their guy", of course.

"Consent of the governed" has no meaning to such people.

12 posted on 04/11/2012 8:00:54 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Inside every socialist lives a latent tyrant.

Tyranny is a requisite corellary to socialism. It precedes from a presumption of superiority and, thus, the ability to make decisions for others. However, often those others don't subscribe to the presumption.

Therefore, it follows that coercion will be a necessary component of the process.

If you observe closely, you will discover that every committed leftist would be comfortable with a dictatorship -- so long as it is "their guy", of course.

"Consent of the governed" has no meaning to such people.

13 posted on 04/11/2012 8:01:22 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Inside every socialist lives a latent tyrant.

Tyranny is a requisite corellary to socialism. It precedes from a presumption of superiority and, thus, the ability to make decisions for others. However, often those others don't subscribe to the presumption.

Therefore, it follows that coercion will be a necessary component of the process.

If you observe closely, you will discover that every committed leftist would be comfortable with a dictatorship -- so long as it is "their guy", of course.

"Consent of the governed" has no meaning to such people.

14 posted on 04/11/2012 8:01:27 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Inside every socialist lives a latent tyrant.

Tyranny is a requisite corellary to socialism. It precedes from a presumption of superiority and, thus, the ability to make decisions for others. However, often those others don't subscribe to the presumption.

Therefore, it follows that coercion will be a necessary component of the process.

If you observe closely, you will discover that every committed leftist would be comfortable with a dictatorship -- so long as it is "their guy", of course.

"Consent of the governed" has no meaning to such people.

15 posted on 04/11/2012 8:01:39 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat
Are you living in my head?! :) My husband says exactly the same things to me.

We can't ALL be wrong (although this time I hope and pray I am wrong)!

16 posted on 04/11/2012 8:10:18 PM PDT by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Snip of last paragraph in the article:
This is an important issue, because I continue to believe that if a dictatorship starts to emerge (many would argue that it already has), it may ultimately get down to a question of whether, at the moment of truth, the military will take orders from Barack Obama or, instead, side with American citizens.

This was what I thought in the first paragraph.

17 posted on 04/11/2012 8:17:29 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat

Race war or not, he is angling to impose himself as dictator. They just seem to be too sure of his re-election for them not to have something up their sleeve. If it’s race war, bring it on.


18 posted on 04/11/2012 8:17:48 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I truly believe he can do anything he wants to do. If there was a freshman congressman who wanted to try to do something about it the GOP “leadership” would shut him up. The elites are calling the shots. And they come from both parties.


19 posted on 04/11/2012 8:21:08 PM PDT by Terry Mross ("It happened. And we let it happen." - Peter Griffin, Family Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Except, of course, Jesus. His coming seems to be sooner than we think. He will rule with a rod of iron, but knows exactly what is right and best. Come LORD Jesus!

20 posted on 04/11/2012 8:28:50 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Look for a second American revolution to happen.


21 posted on 04/11/2012 8:32:20 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

MUCAPIT

making up crap and pretending it’s true - to scare conservatives into supporting whatever their plantation Massa wants them to do.


22 posted on 04/11/2012 8:33:52 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (I wouldnÂ’t vote for Romney for dog catcher if he was in a three way race against Lenin and Marx!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

And, Il Duce became Prime Minister in 1922 lasting ‘til 1945. Give the zero that time in office and see what he will become. He deserves Il Duce’s reward now, not after another 20+ years.


23 posted on 04/11/2012 8:35:48 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CrazyIvan
They seem incredibly naive to think that absolute control is a good thing. I can think of no one who I would allow to have such power.

Exactly. I wouldn't even trust myself with that kind of power. hussein I wouldn't trust with pocket change.

24 posted on 04/11/2012 8:38:55 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I agree completely. I will never vote for Romney, period. I am voting Constitution Party, especially if Virgil Goode is the nominee.


25 posted on 04/11/2012 8:48:58 PM PDT by oac1947
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“Dictator Obama?”

Yes, Dictator is the word. You tried to change the subject; you must be an Obama apologist.

Look at all the Czars. Look at the daily power grabs. Look at HHS and the EPA and their actions.

Yes, Dictator.

You should show more fear; perhaps you’re just naive.


26 posted on 04/11/2012 8:52:31 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Is an Obama dictatorship in the air?

I'll take Rhetorical Questions for $1000 Alex.

27 posted on 04/11/2012 9:07:35 PM PDT by mykroar (Please be aware any /sarc tag is for the lurkers, not the Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Given the percentage of FReepers unwilling to defeat Obama, his re-election and the destruction of America is all but certain.
They’d rather sit around here and explain how, based on past actions at the State level, they know with a certainty what Romney would or wouldn’t do in the White House.
They don’t give a damn about Obama’s desire to burn the house down, they’re more concerned that Romney won’t maintain it properly.


28 posted on 04/11/2012 9:11:36 PM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

“It Can’t happen here” The dumbells that think that are in for a surprise. I have heard Obummer referring to democracy as “messy”. He also has referred to the US Constitution as “standing in his way”. I have heard many liberals recently say that our Constitution was written for another time, and written to benefit the “rich”. All patriotic American citizens better get with it while we still have a country.


29 posted on 04/11/2012 9:13:52 PM PDT by RightLady (Throw the Traitors out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Oh for cripes sake, can people give this a rest? Dictator Obama? Most he'd ever dictate is taking yet another month long vacation or yet another mid week party. He is the laziest pres(id)ent ever.

Obama may be lazy, but he is only the mannequin in the store front window of the dictatorial machine that uses him. That is why he can afford to constantly play, because it isn't him doing the "work" anyway. It is the powers behind him that are not to be taken lightly.

And seriously, who in Washington will cede their power to him? No one will.

Once the dictatorial machine is in place they will be inconsequential. It will not matter what they think or do. They may be the first to go. It is very educational about the subject to listen to these videos with Yuri Bezmenov, an ex KGB agent, who gives away the techniques of manipulating useful idiots. He explains that the useful idiots are often the first to be taken out when they are no longer "useful". These videos are a must for those who want to be informed about how the "communist" thugs plan takeovers of governments.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9bn3i_yuri-bezmenov-techniques-de-manipul_news

30 posted on 04/11/2012 9:25:28 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The military leadership will side with the President and not the Constitution. Since Carter there was a major push to require officers and now enlisted to have Bachelors and then Graduate Degrees to advance. Even though almost all of the degrees had nothing to do with military leadership. Thus the current senior military officers are not US Grant, George Patton or even Dwight Eisenhower. No, these Generals and Admirals are fully indoctrinated by the American University System in neo-Marxist PC feministic feel good nonsense (See Colin Powell). They neither have a original view of the Constitution or the will to defend it. No, when the time comes the active duty Senior Leadership WILL FOLLOW ORDERS, whether they are constitutional or not. As for the enlisted cannon fodder, they vast majority come from broken homes, and have been fully indoctrinated by the Public Skrewl Systems and their NEA masters, and have no true concept of traditional American values much less the Constitution. If you quizzed them probably 99% would think the words “Separation of Church and State” exists in the document. Hundreds of thousands of them have been traumatized by 10 years of multiple deployments where their ability to win has been hamstrung by idiotic ROEs, and as a result are now on psychotropic drugs to deal with their Post Traumatic Stress. A plurality if not an overwhelming majority WILL DO AS TOLD and believe any propaganda fed to them.


31 posted on 04/11/2012 9:27:39 PM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Time. And time is running short, ain’t it.


32 posted on 04/11/2012 9:34:25 PM PDT by BIGLOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kingu
m sick and tired of this stupid strawman to try to make the liberal Romney seem appealing.

Here! Here!

I'm sick of these scare tactics!

I'm voting for Obama! And I hope three Supreme Court Justices croak so he can appoint the replacements! Maybe then these Perrier-drinkers will finally 'preciate a real conservative!

Take that you despicable Rhinos!

33 posted on 04/11/2012 10:17:22 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chooseascreennamepat
We had a bloodless Coup d'état in 08, do we care?

This was my post right after the election, I repost it from time to time, rarely gets a response.

34 posted on 04/12/2012 12:36:08 AM PDT by itsahoot (I will not vote for Romney period, and by election day you won't like him either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Given the percentage of FReepers unwilling to defeat Obama, his re-election and the destruction of America is all but certain.

Maybe you should be having this conversation with the DgOPe, since they have delivered up this Hobsian choice for you. There is a long explanation for the choices we are given by those that are unseen and unknown to us, but they all work for the same master; The Prince and Power of the World.

35 posted on 04/12/2012 12:44:31 AM PDT by itsahoot (I will not vote for Romney period, and by election day you won't like him either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
Look at HHS and the EPA and their actions.

What? Carbon rules that were part of W's last budget? RomneyCareLite aka PelosiCare? Because Obama couldn't be bothered to lead that battle other than to occasionally whine in front of a camera, or summon people before him and tell them to do something about it?

Let's see - the president that established their own private domestic police force, enacting rules to effectively let them take over any other police force at their whim - Obama or W? The plan to use one of the most invasive search machines ever created - devices that aren't even allowed by courts in prisons to search for deadly weapons, instead commonly used on ordinary people supposedly picked at random - Obama or W?

How about an act that requires pawn shops or metals dealers to report any significant transaction to the federal government - Obama or W?

Hells bells, man, these are the types of legislation that get passed when you have liberals in charge. W was pretty alright, all things considered, but his first thought was hardly of the constitution when these brain dead ideas were brought to his mighty auto-signing pen. Obama can't lower himself to work with anyone because that requires leadership, something he's never going to develop as that takes work, and he does not work. I think he'll go down in history to be the only president to never actually sign off on a federal budget, because we've not had one while he's been in office. He can't even get a Democrat to vote FOR his budget, yet he's supposed to get all these people to stand aside while he becomes a dictator?

Put an end to the stupid scare tactics. The strawman is slain, and I will NEVER vote for Mitt Romney for president.

36 posted on 04/12/2012 12:45:42 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat
Obama is finishing the job of concentrating federal power that FDR started, and LBJ propagated.

Which all started under good ole Honest Abe tossing out states rights..

37 posted on 04/12/2012 1:07:52 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnKinAK
The military leadership will side with the President and not the Constitution.

Your statements are exactly opposite of my personal experience with three separate navy commands, two air force commands, and eight army commands. These general officers question orders, especially anything that seems to even come close to bending the constitution. If faced with a commander in chief who has divorced himself from the constitution, they will secure their positions then look to the next constitutional leader who has not detached themselves from the constitution.

As for the common soldier - you are likely right, they will believe the propaganda position that there is a written separation of church and state. But they will not blindly follow orders.

Lastly, as to your belief that they've been, as a whole, co-opted by the university system to be some sort of Marxist drones ignores the rigorous training regimes within the military itself. The military is overwhelmingly conservative. Among the officer corps, maybe one in ten are Democrats. It's more difficult to determine among flag officers, mostly because they refuse to participate in polling. Even among those who identify themselves as Democrat, most are blue dog Democrats who believe very strongly in traditional values.

It infuriates liberals that they can't get Rush off of military broadcasts, and in the few commands where they've had success, soldiers simply share the podcasts.

Your attack upon the honor and dignity of the soldiers of this great nation shows a shocking lack of knowledge of our soldiers, their beliefs, and how they vote. And believe me, there's a big reason why the liberals go out of their way to disenfranchise the military from voting as much as possible - because they know that the military votes conservative.

38 posted on 04/12/2012 1:08:38 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Don’t hijack this thread!

Who said anything about Romney?

This thread is about REMOVING OBAMA. He’s at a minimum a felonious forger and at maximum a foreign, enemy combatant who should be in Gitmo right now.

November is eight months away and Romney is not even the nominee yet.

Many, many things would change before then if Obama supporters here would stop defending his criminal behavior.


39 posted on 04/12/2012 4:46:27 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

“Given the percentage of FReepers unwilling to defeat Obama, his re-election and the destruction of America is all but certain.”

-

FR is the best site on the Interwebz. This place is a whole lot of things, but let’s be realistic, this site certainly is not statistically representative in matters of Romney.

Any and all actual Romney supporters have long ago, been purged.

What’s left now, are anti-Romney people, who either see Obama as the real problem, or anti-Romney people who see Romney as the real problem.


40 posted on 04/12/2012 4:57:43 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Draft Palin VP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Oh, and Obama also a murderer (Brian Terry, Jamie Zapata, +300 Mexicans).

I also think Obama was involved in the murders of SEAL Team 6 members.

Obama needs to be REMOVED NOW!


41 posted on 04/12/2012 5:01:09 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
“Americans who find it difficult to break free of their Normalcy Bias...”

One of the biggest obstacles there is to defeating this evil. People just can't allow themselves to actually SEE & HEAR what is really going on. Just too “painful” and/or “difficult” for too many people; far easier to focus on the playoffs and/or American Idol.

42 posted on 04/12/2012 5:32:00 AM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

According to the White House visitor logs, President Obama invited Chicago Election Commissioner Langdon Neal to the White House three days after the Chicago Board of Elections held a pre-trial hearing for his former White House Chief of Staff. Neal, who was the Election Commissioner in charge of the Chicago Board of Elections’ Rahm Emanuel trial, spent the first day of the Emanuel trial at the White House. President Obama deliberately scheduled a face to face meeting with Election Commissioner Neal at the White House before Neal decided the Emanuel case.

Chicago Board of Election’s hearing officer Joseph Morris, who conducted the Emanuel trial, did not have the legal authority to put Emanuel on the ballot, but Election Commissioner Neal did. Election Commissioner Neal decided in favor of Rahm Emanuel nine days after he spent more than 10 hours at the White House. The timing of President Obama’s invitation and Neal’s lengthy White House visit begs the question, “Did President of Obama tamper with Election Commissioner Neal and his former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s trial?”

To read the entire article, click here.
http://stoneformayor.com/barack-obama/chicago-election-commissioner-visited-the-white-house-9-days-before-deciding-the-rahm-emanuel-residency-case/


43 posted on 04/12/2012 6:13:31 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Yes....his last picture was the crowning result....


44 posted on 04/12/2012 6:19:45 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
Yet another reason to get as many Tea Partiers as possible elected to Congress.
45 posted on 04/12/2012 6:22:38 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Yes you are right they are good Republican voters, the kind that bring us Romney, Dole and McCain. When push comes to shove you’ll be in for a big surprise from these “Conservative Generals”. Beyond Col Lakin, I see no evidence of any officer not falling in line with Dear Leader. For a recent example look at their recommendations to dishonorably discharge the Marine for his private facebook postings. They are falling all over themselves to not look unfaithful to Dear Leader.


46 posted on 04/12/2012 6:47:19 AM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

For far too many here, your post appears to be sad but true, G Larry.

Getting Hussein out of the People’s House is job #1. The mad progressives are smelling takeover and they aren’t shy about abusing the rules or simply breaking them if necessary to achieve their socialist goals.

As in their shameful and illegal conduct in getting Obamacare signed into law, pre-funded. Even now, witness how they threaten the SCOTUS. I fully expect Hussein to disregard an SC ruling striking down Obamacare and simply continue implementing it. Oh, Hussein will pretend to go along with the ruling for a while but he’s counting on getting a critical amount of Obamacare in place and also counting on his press lackeys to dare any legitimate body to scuttle it.

Prayers for our Republic. Romney is the last hope and I’m not sure how I feel about that but he is all we have got between Obama and the final destruction he will bring to our country in a 2nd term.


47 posted on 04/12/2012 7:03:09 PM PDT by citizen (Sherlock Holmes as Romney might now exclaim "The game's afoot!" Romney now needs his Dr. Watson V-P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“The strawman is slain, and I will NEVER vote for Mitt Romney for president.”

Does this mean you’re finished campaigning FOR Obama and are now campaigning AGAINST his opponent(s)? Same result, no?


48 posted on 04/12/2012 7:40:33 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson