Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Right to Life, others endorse Romney (Dear Lord)
Baptist Press/Town Hall ^ | 4-12-12 | Michael Foust

Posted on 04/12/2012 9:01:29 PM PDT by STARWISE

National Right to Life and two other major pro-family groups have endorsed Mitt Romney for president, saying that on the issues of abortion and marriage, he stands with them.

National Right to Life's endorsement Thursday (April 12) came two days after Romney's leading challenger for the Republican nomination -- Rick Santorum -- dropped out, making Romney the presumptive nominee. Also endorsing Romney were the Susan B. Anthony List, a group that supports pro-life women for political office, and the National Organization for Marriage, which has led the charge nationwide in protecting the traditional definition of marriage.

In its endorsement, National Right to Life said Romney "has taken a strong pro-life position and is committed to implementing policies to protect the unborn." The organization said Romney:

-- opposes Roe v. Wade, having called the 1973 decision a "big mistake."

-- supports the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for abortions.

-- backs the Mexico City Policy, which bans federal funds for organizations that perform or promote abortions in foreign countries.

"On pro-life issues, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama provide a stark contrast," said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. "As the country's most pro-abortion president, Barack Obama has pursued a radical pro-abortion agenda. It is now time for pro-life Americans to unite behind Mitt Romney. For the sake of unborn children, the disabled, and the elderly, we must win."

The Susan B. Anthony List made similar points and added that Romney has pledged to "appoint only constitutionalist judges to the federal bench" and also to defund Planned Parenthood.

"Women deserve a president who truly respects our views on an issue so central to womanhood," said Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. "A President Romney will be that man. If there was murkiness during the last election over Barack Obama's extreme abortion position, absolute clarity exists now -- and his abortion position is rejected by women young and old."

The National Organization for Marriage, which played key roles in preventing gay "marriage" from being legalized in California and Maine, said Romney was an early signer of the organization's pledge, which meant he was committing to:

-- support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

-- appoint Supreme Court justices and an attorney general "who will apply the original meaning of the Constitution."

-- "vigorously" defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act in court.

-- establish a presidential commission on religious liberty.

-- advance legislation to allow District of Columbia citizens to vote on the definition of marriage. Gay "marriage" currently is legal in D.C.

Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, said the group was "proud" to endorse Romney.

"President Obama," Brown said, "has declared our nation's marriage laws to be unconstitutional and not only has refused to defend them, his administration is actively working to repeal them in the courts. He's come out against state constitutional amendments defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. And he has appointed leaders of the same-sex 'marriage' movement as national co-chairs of his reelection campaign.

Incredibly, Obama still apparently claims to personally support traditional marriage. With friends like President Obama, the institution of marriage doesn't need enemies."

Compiled by Michael Foust, associate editor of Baptist Press.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; abortion; bizarroworld; dogandponyshow; election2012; endorsement; endorsements; evangelicals; evangelicalsrscrewed; kenyanbornmuzzie; massachusetts; michigan; mittromney; nationalrighttolife; newtgingrich; prolife; ricksantorum; romney; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-298 next last
To: Red Barr

I would like to see Obama defeated soundly by Newt Gingrich/Herman Cain.


101 posted on 04/12/2012 11:30:21 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Thank God for our fathers and mothers, and grandparents.

Without them would we be like these airheads? I sometimes think they can’t have had a heritage at all, to ever be able to sit at the knee of elders as so many of us could.

A shame. I try to find a civilized reason for the acute blindness and try to give the benefit or reasonable doubt to fools, but I can not suffer them gladly, and probably never will.

Interesting about your grandfather. I love to read non-fiction accounts of the resistance during WWII and have several awesome reads, so I was taken by your mention of him immediately.


102 posted on 04/12/2012 11:32:04 PM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't hear, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: srmorton

The choice right now is not between Romney and Obama.

It is between Romney and Newt Gingrich, a soundly pro-life candidate who also understands the danger and methods of the Islamists - who would seek to install sharia by precedents such as the government forcing Christians (Catholics) to violate their own religion (which Romney did in Massachusetts). Once that precedent is there it’s just a matter of switching the government-established religion from “progressivism” to Islam.

And if we support Romney when we could be supporting Gingrich, we are asking for that very thing to happen.

Romney probably means well, but we all know what paves the road to hell. And those who support Romney in the primary as if we were already in the general will pave the way with good intentions.


103 posted on 04/12/2012 11:36:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And if we elected nobody at all as President, they’d still be killing babies. And if we elected EternalVigilance President, they’d still be killing babies.

As to who cares about the “pro-life” movement — start with the hundreds of thousands of people who are alive today who would have been aborted if not for the tireless work of the pro-life movement.

We aren’t perfect, and we don’t have the power to make things perfect, and it is a sad thing — but don’t dump on us because we haven’t parted the waters and led the country to the promised land.

If we ran a mission and rescued half the hostages, you’d denounce it because it didn’t save all the hostages.


104 posted on 04/12/2012 11:40:13 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I think we are still allowed to defend conservative and pro-life organizations when they are attacked.

National Right-to-Life isn’t God. It’s a human organization, run by flawed humans. It is political, and therefore makes political calculations. I’ve seen the state organizations endorse pro-life democrat incumbents against better pro-life republican challengers, simply because they wanted to encourage pro-life democrats, knowing that a democrat majority was bad for the pro-life movement.

But they are a good group, and they have sound reasons for their endorsements.


105 posted on 04/12/2012 11:45:04 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

But Newt is still in the race, and Santorum isn’t, so Newt is what we have now. And it would have been nice if NRTL had held off endorsing until someone had won, rather than endorsing Romney over Gingrich. Gingrich is clearly pro-life, and has been for longer than Romney.

I wish they had endorsed Santorum earlier because it might have helped him raise money.


106 posted on 04/12/2012 11:52:00 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
Or, rather than summarizing, I'll try a transcription:

Sarah Palin: "I am convinced that Governor Romney, if he is our nominee and if he is elected President, he will know to surround himself with those who inherently know to go right, to err on the side of smaller, smarter government, and that gives me a lot of comfort"

"I am convinced" is a lot stronger than your "she hopes". On the other hand, note she did not say Romney would be conservative, but that he would surround himself with conservatives. Still, she seems a lot more comforted by that thought than many people here are.

And she did say she wanted Newt and Ron Paul to stay in the race.

107 posted on 04/12/2012 11:56:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I’m with you 100%.

Much of what we’re seeing in the way of support from Conservatives to Romney is due to politics. These folks cannot see that this isn’t “politics as usual”. Kansas58 is one of those party apparatchiks and what he has said indicates that BHO2 is being widely recognized as a communist. That’s good, because we are right on the edge civil action, most likely very violent in tone and action.

The Democratic Party has been subverted by communists. I’ve been watching what the Democratic Party is doing here out west, and in my city the party headquarters is co-located with the ILWU union hall.

Leo Gerard, the Canadian communist head of International Steel Workers Union, has been pulling out all the stops to get the U.S. labor bosses lined up in support of BHO2. I’m certain there are plans afoot to sabotage western ports and committ violence in order to spur a declaration of martial law by the White House.

This coming election is all about money and power, and who wields it in the U.S.A. Will it be the Global Social Justice movement, meaning communism led by BHO2? Or will it the elites of Wall Street, the Globalists, led by Romney and the Bush family?


108 posted on 04/12/2012 11:56:37 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

You should remember that it is dangerous enough for the poster to make the claim they did about MCFL; nobody would get away with actually arguing any of the points you made, so nobody will.

I wish so many conservative groups didn’t get caught in the cross-fire.


109 posted on 04/12/2012 11:59:04 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Hitler got about 33% of the vote and then in an Obama like fashion ignored the laws, appointed himself supreme leader, and took over agency by agency. He used race baiting as a political technique and blamed all of Germany’s ills on the Wiemar Republic propped up by the Allies. (That is, blamed Democracy). That sounds a lot more like Obama then Romney. Oh, and he also nationalized a lot heavy industry and even bailed out car companies who in turn became nationalized, to save the country, of course. And Hitler and O also seemed to have a great hatred for Churchill. Curious.


110 posted on 04/13/2012 12:02:18 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I think you could also be supporting Ron Paul. He’s still in the race, and Sarah did say she hoped Ron Paul stayed in the race.


111 posted on 04/13/2012 12:02:40 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
To: Kansas58

If Democrats got together and planned to pool their money to buy off the Republican party to make them run liberal candidates, things would be playing out exactly as they are now.

And people like you appear to be fine with rubber-stamping the whole scam instead of standing on principle.

Good point.

112 posted on 04/13/2012 12:04:15 AM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

bfl


113 posted on 04/13/2012 12:27:40 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

What really shocks me is that some people are surprised by what she said..she has been saying for months that she will support whoever the nominee is..she has been supporting Newt from the beginning but if he does not win she will support whoever that person is. People can agree with that or they don’t have to but what she said tonight isn’t exactly breaking news, in fact it was nothing new. She also said she wants Newt and Ron Paul to both stay in the race so NO she did NOT endorse Romney. Michele Bachmann has said the same thing, she will also support whoever the nominee is so if anyone can accuse Sarah Palin of being a RINO(Which is beyond ridiculous!) then the same can be said for Bachmann
I appreciate you transcribing exactly what she said I apologize for the misquote


114 posted on 04/13/2012 12:31:02 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TBP

NRL HAS BEEN A GOP INSIDER OUTFIT FOR A LONG TIME.

THEY SOLD THEIR SOUL TO THE PARTY A LONG TIME AGO AND WOULD SAY THAT GLORIA STEINEM OR BETTY FRIEDAN WERE PRO-LIFE IF THEY HAD AN ‘R’ NEXT TO THEIR NAME IN AN ELECTION.


115 posted on 04/13/2012 1:29:31 AM PDT by Nextrush (PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN IS MY DREAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

That group is the local affiliate of NRL which is nothing but a big money financed tool of the Republican Party insiders (GOP Establishment).

Back in 1988 and 1992 NRL told us to vote for George H. W. Bush 41 who was Pro-Abortion until he became Reagan’s VP and had to toe the Reagan line to get his butt elected.

But when the burden of the presidency was lifted in 1993 I saw Bush 41 with Larry King saying he believed in a “woman’s right to choose” agreeing with his wife Barbara, who had to keep her mouth shut for 12 years when they were in DC.

Then the senior Bushes hushed up while their sons pursued their political destinies.


116 posted on 04/13/2012 1:44:45 AM PDT by Nextrush (PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN IS MY DREAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: KSanders

Or alternately, she’s a pragmatist.


117 posted on 04/13/2012 3:00:35 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Only partly blame NRTL. My blame goes go the GOP for ramming this jerkoff thru the primaries and forcing us to support him.
Well, Mitt may get our votes{maybe or maybe not} but he isnt getting much more. No cash, no signs,no workers who are Conservatives.
FUGOP


118 posted on 04/13/2012 4:22:27 AM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Drew68; Kansas58
Kansas58: "This is not a hard call...Drew you are absolutely correct!"

Drew68: "It's called 'The Lesser Of Two Evils.'"

butterdezillion: "Mitt Romney is not our nominee. There is not a race between Romney and Obama. If these people really cared about getting a pro-lifer in there they would be galvanizing around Newt Gingrich right now."

Thank you butterdezillion. Couldn't be plainer, yet some people are too dim to grasp it, or too docile to resist.

119 posted on 04/13/2012 4:31:13 AM PDT by Lady Lucky (Retro Sark...because you just never know when you'll have needed a sark tag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
And if we elected EternalVigilance President, they’d still be killing babies.

Nope. You're wrong.

120 posted on 04/13/2012 4:32:28 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I didn’t think of what you said as a misquote, because you didn’t say it was a quote. I thought it was a reasonable attempt to paraphrase what she said — I just found the exact way she said it interesting.


121 posted on 04/13/2012 4:40:03 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Maybe somebody can send a bit of Sam Adams their way....

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”


122 posted on 04/13/2012 4:46:42 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thanks for the wrap-up, short and sweet (or sour in Romney’s case). Organizations and individuals that foolishly get behind Romney, need to be notified. I for one will be writing to notify them of the true nature of the person they’re endorsing.


123 posted on 04/13/2012 4:57:48 AM PDT by Lady Lucky (Retro Sark...because you just never know when you'll have needed a sark tag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Did you just hear what Sarah Palin said about Mitt on the Hannity Show

I don't get Hannity -- what did she say?

124 posted on 04/13/2012 5:06:18 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

10 years from now, when many of us are dead or bankrupted or in jail on trumped up political charges, you can all brag about how “pure” you were in 2012, and how you did not “compromise” -—

I’ll be in jail but it won’t be for trumped up charges or i’ll be dead.
I’ll see America crash and burn before I will vote for a 100% phoney like Romney.
In the most critical time in our recent history we need a reformer..someone who will restore our Republic..someone with solid priciples and who do we get...WILLARD?
Well, either his nomination was rigged(Rove/Fox/GOPe), he bamboozled his way in(91% negative ads), or worse he is what America wants (unlikely/no evidence he is a reformer).
Personally, why anyone would want to live in an America where the people elect a Obama or a Romney to the highest office in the land is beyond me.
What once was a Constitutional Republic is no more and there is no evidence Romney will remedy that situation.


125 posted on 04/13/2012 5:26:21 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; onyx

Yes. God help us all.


126 posted on 04/13/2012 5:40:33 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Doesn’t leave us much choice when both parties are slimy and criminal to the core, does it?


127 posted on 04/13/2012 5:50:57 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

NObody questions that Obama is bad, bad news.

If Romney becomes “our” (gag) candidate I will be arguing that Romney is slime but at least he’s not as slimy as Obama.

But Romney is not our candidate, and as long as I have the choice of somebody who is committed to FREEDOM to the point that he would not even consider forcing Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, I have to support the non-tyrant. Why support a tyrant who modeled for Obama the very way he could take over 1/6th of the economy and force a government doctrine onto a religious denomination against their own beliefs?

The R establishment wants everybody to believe that Romney is a done deal. He’s not, and the only way he will be is if people who should know the difference between a primary and a general election betray the very cause they have collected money to support. If I was a Catholic who gave money to NRLC and Susan B Anthony I’d be burning down their phone lines asking for my money back. These groups are jumping the gun, trying to coronate Romney as the candidate when the race is still on and a genuine pro-lifer is still in it.

I told my husband this morning I don’t think my back has any more surface area to field the stabs from people who claim to be on the side of freedom, life, and the US Constitution.


128 posted on 04/13/2012 6:00:06 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Endorse Romney over Obama? Uhh, okay. Endorse Romney over Gingrich? No f’n way!!


129 posted on 04/13/2012 6:09:44 AM PDT by Nobama_ever (Newt/Santorum or Santorum/Newt...NO Rombama and NO 0bama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

What do you mean?

You know the second someone endorses the lesser of two evils, they’re immediately labeled RINO. They endorsed Reagan over devout Christian Carter, but that matters not these days.


130 posted on 04/13/2012 6:17:28 AM PDT by Nobama_ever (Newt/Santorum or Santorum/Newt...NO Rombama and NO 0bama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Geez, the world is truly upside down. Probably a VERY good time to stay really close to Jesus.

Guess I’ll just take the money I was saving for the NRLC and give it to Newt — he’s the only one left standing that truly represents ME, consistently, anymore, on this issue.


131 posted on 04/13/2012 6:22:45 AM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Ron Paul has no clue that the Islamists are our enemies. He also is dangerous for that reason.


132 posted on 04/13/2012 6:31:21 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; wagglebee; wmfights

I am puzzled beyond belief at this hypocrisy.


133 posted on 04/13/2012 6:33:05 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

Jesus is the only One we can really trust. Things are getting crazy and all the supports we once had are crumbling. He never will, and that is the joy that nobody and no thing can ever take away.


134 posted on 04/13/2012 6:37:22 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

What nonsense. Anyone who supports Romney because “HUR HUR HUR HE’S NOT OBAMA” is a party voting for the decline of this nation.


135 posted on 04/13/2012 7:09:07 AM PDT by arderkrag ("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

Newt does not have a prayer.
Newt is, by far, the smartest man in politics and NEWT knows he does not have a prayer.
Newt will have an impact of some type on Delegates and on the Platform issues, and on the national debate on all of the issues.

The Primary is OVER folks.
I don’t like it, but I live in the real world and delusions and fantasy do not help the cause.


136 posted on 04/13/2012 7:19:24 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Dr. Brian Kopp; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; ...
A true conversion ALWAYS has some sort of catalyst that triggers it. This may be a dramatic event like Paul's experience on the road to Damascus, or it may be a more drawn-out process where a person begins to question things and their beliefs change over a period of time. However, when a genuine conversion has a occurred, the person can typically explain what has transpired AND the change is obvious to people who have known them before and after.

There are many members of the pro-life movement who were once pro-death and we welcome and embrace them because we can see that, by God's grace, their hearts and minds have changed. These conversions are real and they are obvious.

Mitt Romney has had no such conversion. He was always pro-abortion until he decided to run for president six or so years ago and he realized that he had to say he was pro-life in order to win the GOP nomination. If he had experienced a real change he would talk about it, but he doesn't, he wants people to believe he has always been pro-life and this is a lie.

137 posted on 04/13/2012 7:19:42 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer; STARWISE
Yes. God help us all.

Keep praying. We trust in Him.

It's not yet mid April. Nothing is set in cement.

138 posted on 04/13/2012 7:20:42 AM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

National Organization for Marriage
2029 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington DC 20006

Phone: (888) 894-3604
Fax: (888) 894-3604
Email: contact@nationformarriage.org

I called 3x to get a live person so I left a message.


139 posted on 04/13/2012 7:21:46 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins; STARWISE; wagglebee; wmfights
I am puzzled beyond belief at this hypocrisy.

Perhaps follow Romney's money...

140 posted on 04/13/2012 7:22:57 AM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Newt does not have a prayer.

He has mine.

FWIW, your droning is growing tedious, repetitious and tiresome to the point where you're becoming a PITA.

141 posted on 04/13/2012 7:28:29 AM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Care to place a wager on who is correct?

Courage is the ability to face the truth and do our best in dealing with that truth.

You do not deserve to be a leader in the Conservative movement if you dwell in fantasy and delusion.


142 posted on 04/13/2012 7:35:37 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Again, you are politically incompetentent if you do not accept the expertise of the National Right to Life Committee!

You are forever tainted with a vote for Romney! That blood does NOT wash out, stained forever/eternity! I bet Romney bought them off like he does with everything else. Satan's own little minion - the LYING MITT and now satan has the National RTL movement in his pocket.

Again, you are politically incompetentent if you do not accept the expertise of the National Right to Life Committee!

Their expertise is from the DEVIL! Don't you even attempt to tell me to accept EVIL - EVER!! with your eternally blood stained hands!

143 posted on 04/13/2012 7:39:06 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Nobama_ever
You know the second someone endorses the lesser of two evils, they’re immediately labeled RINO.

Well, I'll keep posting here as long as Jim lets me but I refuse to participate in the mass delusion that has overtaken this place. I was for Perry from the beginning but despite being a stalwart conservative with a decade of executive experience and economic success under his belt, he allowed his campaign to implode. From there I tepidly went to the Gingrich camp where he quickly demonstrated what I had suspected, that he wasn't ready for Prime Time either. In retrospect, it appears that Mitt Romney was the only candidate who took the job of running for president seriously.

I'm getting awfully tired of these blue-staters standing on their pedestal and sanctimoniously telling me that they're "too principled" to vote for Romney. That's great if you live in California, a state that will go 60+ percent for Obama with or without your vote! I live in Florida. My vote counts and I will be voting to remove Obama from the White House. My children's future depends on it. At one time I would have thought that removing Obama from the White House would have been a shared goal on this forum but increasingly I am having my doubts.

144 posted on 04/13/2012 7:42:02 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

Comment #145 Removed by Moderator

To: presently no screen name
take your meds, you look like a kook!
146 posted on 04/13/2012 7:44:16 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

They’re all selling out. Don’t these people understand that women in MA are TODAY getting their cheap abortions because of Mitt Romney? And he has NO problem with it.

They can all sell their souls to the devil, if that’s what they want. I answer to God only. I will not vote for Romney.


147 posted on 04/13/2012 7:46:58 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
It's called "The Lesser Of Two Evils." The real world is a little different than Free Republic. Figure it out.

As someone said the other day, voting for the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. Better to abstain.

148 posted on 04/13/2012 7:49:50 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
What nonsense. Anyone who supports Romney because “HUR HUR HUR HE’S NOT OBAMA” is a party voting for the decline of this nation.

So go vote for Obama. I won't be joining you.

149 posted on 04/13/2012 7:50:29 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
As someone said the other day, voting for the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil. Better to abstain.

That sounds like a great bumper sticker. Sorry, but I live in the real world where my children will pay the price of Obama's administration. I will do my best to attempt to mitigate the damage this man will do to their futures.

150 posted on 04/13/2012 7:53:22 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson