Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wpin

Once you can state that the pre-born is a human worth protection of the laws, then there is no bright line as to how early the ban could be extended.
Be glad for this.


3 posted on 04/13/2012 5:50:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
Once you can state that the pre-born is a human worth protection of the laws, then there is no bright line as to how early the ban could be extended. Be glad for this.

The claimed ends don't justify the means.

These bills, which define the child as a person, and then make "legal" provision for the killing of certain disfavored classes of these persons, are grossly immoral and completely unconstitutional.

Our Constitution ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES equal protection for ALL. There are NO exceptions. And it's NOT optional.

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."


11 posted on 04/13/2012 6:06:08 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can't be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson