Rasmussen Presidential Tracking Poll (Romney 48%, Obama 44%)

rasmussenreports.com ^ | April 13, 2012 | staff

[fwdude]

Rasmussen polls registered voters (how he confirms this is anyone’s guess - the honor system?) and has been pretty close on most races, much more than the LameStream Media polls, which ask any illegal or felon what they think.

[Cheerio]

When he gets a good ass kicking for the first time in his life, I think he’s going to start to come unhinged in a big way.

IF you are correct, I hope our MILITARY are up to the challenge. This a$$hat will NOT voluntarily leave the WH. Obozo and the missus are too accustomed to the tax funded luxury they have been enjoying. Remember it is all about getting even with WHITEY. "Our Turn Now", 2008
(note the title of the blog!!)

[proud2beconservativeinNJ]

”I ain’t drinkin’ fer Mitt Romney, I’ma drinkin’ AGIN’ Barak Obama...”

Here, here.

[proud2beconservativeinNJ]

I for one just want to see the Kenyan defeated.

I double that.

[KTM rider]

“I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.”

“I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.”

“I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.”

“I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.”

“I’d just ask you to keep four things in mind: Justice Scalia just turned 78, Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year, Justice Breyer will be 76 in August, and Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.”

I'll never vote for Romney, but I will certainly vote against the Obamanation of desolation by whatever means necessary,

Maybe I can hire a wetback at Home depot to go into the voting booth for me so that I can retain my dignity

[erod]

Yeah well he’s going to get his racist ass kicked in November. He is a tyrant, but he will be removed this isn the USSR.

[Sola Veritas]

Would hope so. Here’s a banner for the ABR types. (I’m ABO myself.)

I find your picture posted to be extremely offensive in implying that those of us, to include Jim Robinson, are supporting Obama by opposing Romney. You realy should be zotted.

[Sola Veritas]

The rule is very simple and I just reposted it here again for about the millionth time http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2871707/posts. FR is a pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-constitutionally limited government, pro-gun, pro-liberty organization. Romney is none of the above (literally). We will not vote for or support a known abortionist, homosexualist, gun grabbing, big government mandate loving constitution trampling progressive LIAR!! And we will not waste our limited resources on FR for those who wish to defy our strongly held positions or our nations founding principles
Jim Robinson

What part of Jim’s message don’t you understand? Stop posting pro-romney trash....especially pictures that insult those of us that will not vote for Romney. Are not voting for Romney does not make us Obama supporters.

[Reily]

Ok questions
I have GOP Mass’ers claim to me the following. Maybe you can verify or at least give me another perspective/data point.

1. Mass state constitution makes the Guv a weak office compared to the legislature. True or not?

2. Judicial appointments are actually controlled by some council. Basically they select the pool that the Guv picks from. True or not?

3. Local government is very strong compared to state government. True or not?

4. State commissions have a lot of power and are almost independent of state and local governments. True or not?

I accepted these 4 claims as true in 2008 which allowed me to prefer Romney over McCain. (I was really annoyed with McCain!)

[Leep]

Thats great news for folks who would rather have a hardcore progressive, as far left as you could get without actually being a flat out communist, Republican’t VS a actual commie leftist.
It also means he can win without my vote...?

[dirtboy]

This is not about Romney, it’s about Obama

You were a Romney booster last time around. And you loved to bash on anti-Romneys this time around.

Methinks with you it IS about Romney, you're just not honest enough to admit such.

[SaraJohnson]

Trayvon “kill whitey” campaign has not helped? What is a Kenyan community organizer from Chicago to do?

[Vigilanteman]

Woodrow Wilson may have been a progressive internationalist butthead, but he was nowhere near as horridly anti-American as ObaMao. I toured his presidential birth home in Staunton, Virginia not to many years ago and came away with a grudging respect on how he handled Mexico. I’ll look for that link if you would like.

[Sola Veritas]

“Looks like the votes of the purists don’t matter after all. Romney will crush Zero.”

Still to early to predict that. Romney is a slippery eel, but he has met his match in Obama. Expect to see polls swing wildly from now to November.

However, I’m a “purist” and I’m not supporting Romney. Should he win the election, which I doubt, he won’t do it with my support. Also, should he win, he will stab you in the back so quick it will make your head spin. IF he gets a chance at a SCOTUS appointment, it will be another Souter. We “purists” will be telling you “I told you so.”

Should we be wrong, IF he wins, then he might have a chance at a second term with our support....but not the first one.

[bIlluminati]

But no, sadly, Obama thought he had a mandate to transform America - into a Marxist/Leninist utopia dystopia . . .

Whenever you use Marxist/Leninist, the following word must be dystopia ... utopia simply doesn't scan.

[TexasFreeper2009]

Anyone else find it interesting that there hasn’t been a SINGLE poll of the primary race since Santorum dropped out?

There was every reason to believe that Newt would pick up most of Santorum’s support which would have put him into the 30’s.

[hinckley buzzard]

I notice you never got an answer to your reasonable question. Bad sign. I think the clouds are gathering.

[Road Glide]

“You know, I’d like a clarification about this too. The majority of active FR members don’t give a crap how Romney’s doing in the polls, etc. Yet there are two Romney poll articles in breaking news. Not only do most of us not give a crap, the continuation of active boosterism by some is beyond annoying.”

This forum is gonna get pretty quiet come July, if folks aren’t allowed to talk about “the R guy”...

[hinckley buzzard]

Thanks for your service. Unfortunately, your political observations, sensible as they may be, appear to be non grata here. Please don't take it personally.

[hinckley buzzard]

So tell us Sola, just what is your position here? You appear to be nothing so much as the Soviet Political Officer assigned to naval vessels to watch the crew and make sure there are no "revisionist thinkers" aboard. Is that your role? C'mon, you can tell us. We're your friends.