Skip to comments.We will not waste our limited resources on FR in support for a liberal progressive LIAR
Posted on 04/13/2012 12:13:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:
Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesnt even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.
Ive stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that Id never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.
Cmon. These are the reasons the tea party sprang up and the reasons he and Rove loathe the tea party and our tea party conservative candidates. Romney famously expressed his loathing for Reagan-Bush conservatism several years ago when he was trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy and now hes cloaking himself in Reagan conservatism, knowing full well that its a lie, but he knows its the only way he can possibly win, er buy the Republican nomination.
Screw Romney!! I absolutely will not support or vote for a proven compulsive liar with a known record of abortion and big government socialism, liberal appointments, etc. He still lies about RomneyCommieCare today. Calls it a conservative solution. Get real!!
Listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say about the elites pushing socialism on America via compulsory health insurance:
Ronald Reagan speaks out against RomneyCommieCare
There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!
Damn the libs and RINOS, full steam ahead!!
But no matter what happens we must turn out in November to vote IN as many conservatives and vote OUT as many rats as possible at all levels of government. If we don't have a conservative at the top of the ticket we must turn out anyway and vote straight conservative DOWN ticket!! Just think of it an off cycle election and pour on the TEA!! It'll be doubly important that we control both houses of congress and as many statehouses as possible.
Restore the 10th amendment!! Impeach the leftist president whoever he may be!! Restore Liberty!! Rebellion comes from the bottom up!!
WOO HOO!! I CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM MY HOUSE!!
No Bama!! No Romney!! Go tea party rebellion!!
Sounds like the liberal mindset has bit them good!
They're not legitimate questions. I'm engaging you because you asked a fairly direct one, not a straw man argument or simply a personal invective. My time is valuable to me; I don't have time, resources or the desire to answer every erratic post.
second, MR already abandoned the RPP with his GOV record. Place his actions side by side with the RPP and do the math.
That's a fair point. I consider the risk to be worth it in relation to the possible end of capitalism and the abandonment of Israel among other issues.
Third, Did you read JRs first post? Then why do you keep supporting Romney here?
I don't support Romney. Do you see me posting a thousand talking points about the great guy Mitt Romney is? I support ABO this time around. I have no choice; this is not about liberal vs. conservative; this is about the survival of the West.
Do you respect JRs edict or not? Yes or no.
Was it an edict? No one can say they're simply voting for the nominee? And if anyone answers caustic attacks, that makes them guilty of "supporting Romney here" but if they don't answer, then you attack them for not answering a "bunch of questions." Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
To: mmanager "Dont vote for Romney"
It is disingenuous or a flat out blatant lie, to state that Jim Rob or anyone else here is instructing you how to vote. That is your own decision.
If you have been following Jim's posts, I think he has stated two points as I understand them-
- He stated his own personal decision to not vote for Mitt. I know it rankles some of you, but that is his decision and he is free to do with his vote as he pleases.
- He stated that he does not want anyone using the resources of FreeRepublic to campaign for Mitt. Again he is free to make that decision for his website, as promoting a progressive goes against everything he has stood for all these years. It is also a good business decision, because that would dilute or spoil the brand of FreeRepublic. It is after all a website for conservatism, not conservatism and liberalism on alternate days.
1,887 posted on Sat Apr 14 2012 20:14:22 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by Moorings
Apparently, the poster above didn't understand the "edict" clearly. You may need to resend the memo. I haven't campaigned or advocated for Romney at all, nor have any of the others that are being attacked by the purists here as far as I can tell. Anything that states otherwise (regarding myself) is a blatant lie.
Also, Jim’s reply to me has been much more sensible and fair than most of those who are invoking his name.
Myself, I have never argued that it’s over or that we should accept defeat. I am heartened that Newt is still in the race and I believe everything may change in May.
No surprise there. That one was courting the lightning like nobody's business. Thanks.
My time is as well. If you cannot discern a relevant set of questions, then don’t waste mine.
Actually you just don’t want to answer them . Be honest.
Lastly, Arguing that ABO AKA Romney is an acceptable choice is support. A vote is by definition support. Why you remain insulated I have yet to determine.
I think it was more of a drunk-over .. LOL
That’s the best you can do?
“he doesn’t hate this country”.
Oh yea. I’m in.
Ain’t no way he can’t win.
Ah, I love those Bavarians
Y’know I remember when things were a lot more fun around here
When good was good and evil was evil
Before things got so fuzzy
I was once a golden boy like you
And I was summoned to the halls of power in the heavenly courts
And I dined with the deities who looked upon me with favor,
for my talents, my creativity
and we sat beneath the palms
in the warm afternoons and drank the wine
With Fitzgerald and Huxley.....
Thanks for keeping my six, bud. I done already blamed that little kerfuffle on my friend Al Keehol ;-)
Then he will lose and will deserve to. There’s only so much nose holding I can do. Picking a Christie or Mitch Daniels would signal that he is indeed going to screw us all.
Gotta keep tabs. Soros’ orders ;)
Way to go, Newt! That's a very encouraging bit of news.
Now let us pray Palin gets on a few stages with him and Romney will blow apart..
Then let us pRey...
Man, can you believe this thread? I haven’t seen one go this long in ages. I don’t think I made it past the 500’s.
It’s worse than the PDS wars in many cases. There it was whacked out libs on a vendetta. Here there are good people voluntarily abandoning their very faith just to chalk up one in the win column regardless of what that truly means.
Now there's a thought that quickens the pulse! Can you imagine what would happen if they announced her intention to run with him, should he win the nomination? Hoo boy!
Ok I give up. Who’s that?
The first car I drove was a BMW. 1972 2002. 4sp.
I just inherited several Drillings. Sauer and Son. One a luffwaffe drilling. They actually put these in planes as as survival gun during WW2. No wonder these crazy Krauts lost!
I have come to the conclusion that the more “cultured” and “refined” etc. you are the crazier u are. Course, we’re all nuts. Just at a different level.
I can't speak for you or how you will act in the upcoming election but for myself when dealing with a man like Romney I realize he will have to be Charlie Cristed.
He was a governor of Fla. We did light a huge fire under his ass. We did get rid of him./Now we have a gentleman named Marco Rubio.
In this election cycle I thoroughly supported Palin,then Newt and now as you so appropriately noted side with Rush and proclaim anyone but ozero.
Am I happy about the situation? Hell no.I wanted a conservative.Now the question is am I a sore loserman? Will that help or hinder a long term conservative cause? For me I fight for the long haul.
Muslims get it. They fight 50/100, 500 year wars and never give up even when we kick their ass over and over.
If we start giving up, start claiming our guy didn't get in so we won't vote. We can feel good about our selves but to me that's always been a liberal tendency to go with ones "feelings".
My biggest concern after the next election is who gets in and what potential we have to influence the new potus. IMHO, we will not influence ozero at all.
I think differently about Romney.I think we have the potential to influence what he does.
Will it be 100% of the time, 70% of the time? I just don't know.But I do surmise that we have a better chance at doing what we do best here on FR of leading the horse to water with Romney than with ozero. Just my opinion.
And that's what makes it so hard to stay with the discussion. I feel like I'm being assaulted with treason all around me. I can only take so much of that, before I've got to take a breather. It's just hard to bear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.