Since you lack the intellectual aptitude to differentiate between acknowledgment and agreement, you might at least attempt to rebut the argument on a Constitutional basis.
Or is that to much of a strain for you?
There is no constitutional right for secession.
Licoln had every constitutional right and duty to defend the nation from rebellion, which is in the Constitution.
And ofcourse you guys always claim that you aren't 'for' slavery, but that is why the South were rebelling over what a noble cause you guys rally around!
The right of a State to enslave people.
This thread is on the Declaration of Independence, and because it was universal in nature the Founders had a hard time justfying slavery and hoped that eventaully it would be ended.
As for the Constitution, you can check out the facts here
Abraham Lincoln’s fidelity to the Declaration of Independence is equally a fidelity to the Constitution. The Constitution takes its moral life from the principles of liberty and equality, and was created to serve those principles. We are divided as a nation today, as in Lincoln’s time, because we have severed the connection between these two documents.
Lincoln’s “Fragment on the Constitution and the Union” contains the central theme of Lincoln’s life and work. Drawing upon biblical language, Lincoln describes the Declaration of Independence as an “apple of gold,” and the Constitution as the “frame of silver” around it. We cannot consider the Constitution independently of the purpose which it was designed to serve.
The Constitution acts to guard the principles enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. As the embodiment of the Declaration’s principles, the Constitution created a frame of government with a clear objective. The Constitution is not a collection of compromises, or an empty vessel whose meaning can be redefined to meet the needs of the time; it is the embodiment of an eternal, immutable truth.
Abraham Lincoln defended the Union and sought to defeat the Confederate insurrection because he held that the principles of the Declaration and Constitution were inviolable. In his speeches and in his statecraft, Lincoln wished to demonstrate that self-government is not doomed to either be so strong that it overwhelms the rights of the people or so weak that it is incapable of surviving.
About the Lecturer:
Kevin Portteus is assistant professor of politics at Hillsdale College, where he has taught since 2008. Dr. Portteus is faculty advisor for the Washington-Hillsdale Internship Program, and teaches courses in American political thought and American political institutions.
A visiting graduate faculty member in the American History and Government program at Ashland University, Dr. Portteus formerly taught at Belmont Abbey College and Mountain View College, in Dallas. Having published online through the Washington Times, Human Events, and BigGovernment.com, his book, Executive Details: Public Administration and American Constitutionalism, is under review for publication. He received his B.A., summa cum laude, from Ashland University, and his M.A. and Ph.D. in politics from the University of Dallas.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2869815/posts
But I am sure you will regard Hillsdale college some 'leftwing' college and the lecturer as someone else who was brainwashed by the public school system.