Skip to comments.Some Stars Capture Rogue Planets
Posted on 04/19/2012 12:32:59 PM PDT by robowombat
Some Stars Capture Rogue Planets by Staff Writers Boston MA (SPX) Apr 20, 2012
New research suggests that billions of stars in our galaxy have captured rogue planets that once roamed interstellar space. The nomad worlds, which were kicked out of the star systems in which they formed, occasionally find a new home with a different sun. This finding could explain the existence of some planets that orbit surprisingly far from their stars, and even the existence of a double-planet system.
"Stars trade planets just like baseball teams trade players," said Hagai Perets of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The study, co-authored by Perets and Thijs Kouwenhoven of Peking University, China, will appear in the April 20th issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
To reach their conclusion, Perets and Kouwenhoven simulated young star clusters containing free-floating planets. They found that if the number of rogue planets equaled the number of stars, then 3 to 6 percent of the stars would grab a planet over time. The more massive a star, the more likely it is to snag a planet drifting by.
They studied young star clusters because capture is more likely when stars and free-floating planets are crowded together in a small space. Over time, the clusters disperse due to close interactions between their stars, so any planet-star encounters have to happen early in the cluster's history.
Rogue planets are a natural consequence of star formation. Newborn star systems often contain multiple planets. If two planets interact, one can be ejected and become an interstellar traveler. If it later encounters a different star moving in the same direction at the same speed, it can hitch a ride.
A captured planet tends to end up hundreds or thousands of times farther from its star than Earth is from the Sun. It's also likely to have a orbit that's tilted relative to any native planets, and may even revolve around its star backward.
Astronomers haven't detected any clear-cut cases of captured planets yet. Imposters can be difficult to rule out. Gravitational interactions within a planetary system can throw a planet into a wide, tilted orbit that mimics the signature of a captured world.
Finding a planet in a distant orbit around a low-mass star would be a good sign of capture, because the star's disk wouldn't have had enough material to form the planet so far out.
The best evidence to date in support of planetary capture comes from the European Southern Observatory, which announced in 2006 the discovery of two planets (weighing 14 and 7 times Jupiter) orbiting each other without a star.
"The rogue double-planet system is the closest thing we have to a 'smoking gun' right now," said Perets. "To get more proof, we'll have to build up statistics by studying a lot of planetary systems."
Could our solar system harbor an alien world far beyond Pluto? Astronomers have looked, and haven't found anything yet.
"There's no evidence that the Sun captured a planet," said Perets. "We can rule out large planets. But there's a non-zero chance that a small world might lurk on the fringes of our solar system."
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
First, there were no other planets. The, maybe. Then, wow, we found on gas giant. Then, hey, lots of gas giants. Then, wow, smaller rocky planets. Then, hey, smaller rocky planets in the habitable zone. Then billions and billions of planets. Then rogue planets. And now...
Traveling small rocky planets looking for a habitable zone as they go from star to star through intersteller space!
LOL, seems the release of info is speeding up right quick heah!
Prediction for next info release: "What's that in the sky? Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No! It's...
I’d always assumed such things would happen. Lots of the exoplanets we’ve found have retrograde orbits and that’s always been my personal explanation for them.
“There’s no evidence that the Sun captured a planet,”
Then explain the rotation of Uranus.
Something happened to Venus. My personal theory is that it took a hard hit that caused the backspin.
I think that started in the disco era.
You owe me a keyboard for that.
Been there, done that........
Didn’t Velikovsky postulate that this had happened to Venus
No. He made the claim that Venus emerged from Jupiter. He predicted that, if he was right, Venus would have a very high surface temperature and a hydocarbon atmosphere. This was in 1952 when most believed that the shrouded planet was much like Earth’s tropical regions - a virtual twin.
He was proven correct 20 years later on both counts. The Jupiter part is as yet not proven - but some have pointed to the Great Red Spot as a possible place where Venus.
He further said the event had a dramatic impact on Earth’s and Mars’ recent history - around 6000 years ago.
It must be a real b*tch getting mail forwarded much less keep your old area code. :-)
Note: this topic is from 4/19/2012. Thanks robowombat.
Note: this topic is from 4/19/2012. Thanks robowombat.
|· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·|
|Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.