Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Do Conservatives Go Now? Part 2 (Don’t Get Suckered into Supporting the Republican Party)
Conservative HQ ^ | 19 Apr 12 | Richard A. Viguerie

Posted on 04/20/2012 8:09:50 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last
To: xzins

Might as well vote for Obama.


181 posted on 04/21/2012 6:39:50 AM PDT by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diggity

So, you are telling me you are a Romney supporter.

Good, now look us conservative FReepers in the eye and say to us that Romney is a conservative.

Follow that by saying, “Romney is NOT a liberal.”


182 posted on 04/21/2012 7:22:15 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I agree. Their is little difference between the dem establishment and the gop establishment.

Just look at what Romney has supported. The other day, Rove sent a media message to Romney that it’s time to soften up on illegal amnesty.

You know...the Romney who gave honest candidates like Gingrich and Perry heck over their efforts to offer their solution.


183 posted on 04/21/2012 7:28:43 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Dragonspirit

Romney is a loser...he won’t win anyway. He’s not going to have his money advantage against Obama that he had against Perry, Gingrich, et al. Nor will he have major news, hollywood, newspapers, etc., all pushing his case. They were just make sure they got a liberal to run against a liberal....a win/win for them.

A liberal win in the republican party will turn that party totally against social conservatism for good. It will put the US back in the hands of “republicans” who thought Dick Nixon’s wage and price controls were just fine and dandy.

It will make cronyism (whether crony corporatism or friendship nepotism) the “socialism” practiced by republicans. It will be the type of government control of resources and production done via connections, understandings, and deals.

A vote for Romney or Obama is a vote for the end of American freedom.


184 posted on 04/21/2012 7:35:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

If we checked the record, we’d find that Mussolini operated largely in the spirit of corporatism/elitism.


185 posted on 04/21/2012 7:37:21 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Excellent post, Doughty. There is no doubt that decades of “lesser of 2 evils” voting has driven this nation to the brink of socialism and into the pit of immorality.


186 posted on 04/21/2012 8:12:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
I see two things dominant in your posts: wishful thinking contradicted by the evidence as to what Romney won't do, and etremely emotional clouding of perception on all things anti-liberal, anti-Obama, and anti-Democrat.

You're like an obese person who argues that he's going to lose weight by cutting back from eight pieces of cake a day to seven and gets spitting angry when the fallacy of his strategy is pointed out to him.

187 posted on 04/21/2012 8:28:47 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

So, you’re saying that my feeling of self worth and the way my wife and dog feel about me is dependent on who the Pubbies put up for president?

Wow...


188 posted on 04/21/2012 9:38:53 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You're willing to make a "deal with the devil," Romney, in order to avoid Obama. A deal with the devil is always a losing proposition.

Obama is the devil.

I'm really sorry you can't see that.

189 posted on 04/21/2012 9:40:46 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I have to ask this question. Why do you not despise Obama and see how evil he is? As for Romney, I happen to think he will govern pretty much according to the polls if he is elected, which isn’t good but is much better than what we have now or will have if Obama wins.


190 posted on 04/21/2012 11:03:52 AM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Finny

“I see two things dominant in your posts: wishful thinking contradicted by the evidence as to what Romney won’t do, and extremely emotional clouding of perception on all things anti-liberal, anti-Obama, and anti-Democrat. You’re like an obese person who argues that he’s going to lose weight by cutting back from eight pieces of cake a day to seven and gets spitting angry when the fallacy of his strategy is pointed out to him.”

PLUS, just as FR is likewise divided today, a republican congress will be divided between the “support a repub prez at any cost” crowd and those who will not compromise our conservative values, and conservative representation for the next four years will be essentially, neutered.

Dems will chortle about the “do nothing” republicans, give the people-pleasing Mormon Bishop a sniff of cooperation, lead donkey Romney with a carrot stick of connections and influence, and face little hindrance in their continued downgrade of the country, and introduce their next Messiah with the preamble that whatever cannot be blamed on Bush, is now Romney’s responsibility, and Obama was a misunderstood genius whose ideas were never permitted to bear fruit due to republican obstruction. At that point people will be so sickened by anything that comes from a flip flopping republucan party, that the Dems could get Charles Manson paroled and elect him.

Our only shot is to be a conservative party, because the former definitions of Republicanism are now meaningless. Whether or not a President is a true conservative during this uphill battle, is as vital a question as whether a lump on your wife’s breast, is benign or cancerous.

People are afraid...they’re facing hard times,
and rightly so, when a clear and present danger to the security of the United States is presently resting his Italian leather shoes atop the executive desk in the Oval Office. Those that are comforted by anyone Caucasian and Republican in office must hink a Republican nightlight will keep the boogeyman away for four years.

They fail to realizethis is no longer an uncompromised electoral process, what America is truly facing is not a conflict over what our country should be, this is a cold war intended to destroy what America is.

We cannot contemplate being led by closet Nazis onto our present-day Omaha beach, nor can a man hailing Emperor Hirohito retake our Phillippines, it is suicidally asinine to employ liberals in a war against socialism...such a betrayal spits in the face of every American family that has suffered during this long retreat.

We face a long road ahead. The Tea Party secured a beachhead, conservatives have dug in. It’s time to start battling for every inch of ground and cut off our enemy at the knees. Do you choose leaders who will frustrate the enemy’s every design, or those who will acquiesce at every opportunity?

Which flag will you follow?


191 posted on 04/21/2012 11:24:23 AM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Hell yes I support Romney but you go ahead and vote for Obama.


192 posted on 04/21/2012 12:14:54 PM PDT by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Yep. The Free Republic stopped being fully conservative around the TEA party time. You heard the calls for the TEA parties to abandon their calls to cut spending and to end their push for small-government in favor of abortion and gay marriage.

And it’s snowballed since.

At best, this place is just a traditional values and religion site, now.


193 posted on 04/21/2012 1:02:55 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: hattend
So, you’re saying that my feeling of self worth and the way my wife and dog feel about me is dependent on who the Pubbies put up for president?

No, I'm not saying that at all. What I'm saying, is that I will not vote for a man who has been a willing participant in the violation of every patriotic/conservative principle that I hold.

Doing such would be compromising my personal honor and integrity to a degree that would shame me for life. I could never again look another conservative in the eye, and tell them that I can be trusted to stand firm on our mutually held core values. I'd be a liar, if I did.

Once a person has lost their personal integrity, they've lost everything. It's all downhill from there.

Now, having said all that, if you can't see any other choice but to violate your personal integrity in this election by abandoning your principles, then I'm sorry for you. I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees.

194 posted on 04/21/2012 1:20:12 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Liberals quite clearly want the Democrats to win the election, because they know if they win they get more of what they want.

While a protest vote, stay at home, etc might give a very temporary bite of protest satisfaction, the reality is that you will then have less of what you want, and you will get a more liberal candidate in future elections.

More Obama means more Kagan and Sotomayors on the SC. More Obama means more Solyndras and less Keystone pipeline. More Obama means Eric Holder can continue to safely race bait with his AG title. More Obama means Cap and Trade, Buffett Rule, and in general more taxes, less civil liberties, less fossil fuel and less employment.

Not voting for Romney is like saying you won’t buy the car because it is green instead of blue, and instead you’ll get Obama who will give you a walking stick instead of a car.


195 posted on 04/21/2012 1:34:32 PM PDT by Dragonspirit (Always remember President Token won only by defecting on his CFR pledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

I think our difference is that I view Romney as a mushy moderate rather than a full-blown liberal.


196 posted on 04/21/2012 1:41:41 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Finny
In other words, you are advocating the embrace of Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. I've already voted the way you think is smart. I"ve been voting that way for quite awhile now, and things only keep getting worse. Read and ponder DoughtyOne's post #38.

Your inability to read sort of codistributes with other characteristics. "TAKE OVER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY" DOESN'T MEAN GO OUT AND VOTE REPUBLICAN ONCE EVERY TWO OR FOUR YEARS. IT MEANS GET INVOLVED AT THE MOST LOCAL LEVEL OF THE PARTY YOU CAN AND TAKE CONTROL OF THE APPARATUS. THIS IS HOW THE LEFTISTS DID IT WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
197 posted on 04/21/2012 1:43:17 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Follow the context of the previous posts and get back to me.


198 posted on 04/21/2012 1:44:18 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
No, I'm not saying that at all. What I'm saying, is that I will not vote for a man who has been a willing participant in the violation of every patriotic/conservative principle that I hold.

I see a lot of "I" in there...so you weren't talking about me, merely projecting.

Now, having said all that, if you can't see any other choice but to violate your personal integrity in this election by abandoning your principles, then I'm sorry for you. I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees.

With Obama in for another 4 years, you just might. I can't predict the future.

Voting against Obama will not hurt my personal integrity at all. If he loses, I will be dancing in the streets and high fiving everybody who voted likewise and laughing in my lib friends' and relatives' faces.

If, after 3 years, you don't see the evil that is the Obama regime, nothing I can say will change your mind. Not that I really care if you do or not.

I'm not here to convince you one way or the other. The evidence of the last 3 years speaks for itself.

199 posted on 04/21/2012 1:53:50 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: bigoil
Your TEA Party Independent ticket for 2012:

I suspect it would poll 19%, just like when HRP ran in 92.

Baraq wins with a Clintonian plurality.

200 posted on 04/21/2012 1:58:56 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson