Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
A divorce granted doesn’t mean the petitioner told the truth.

C'mon Rummy Chick, that wasn't my point. For a US Court to grant a divorce to an American Citizen there must have been some weight to the fact there was a marriage existence in the first place.

We don’t know what is real story and probably never will.

I concur with you 1,000%!

What we do know is that the someone in the Republican Party most likely knew that Chester Arthur’s father was not a citizen when Chester was born.

That could well be true, but I am not sure why it is germaine to the conversation we're having in your reply.

My entire post, to which you responded to, was that certain posters always show up on these type threads to offer subtle, snide derision against those of us that are speculating on, and trying to ascertain the truth, threads.

38 posted on 04/20/2012 5:22:03 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio - http://www.istandwithrush.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron

“C’mon Rummy Chick, that wasn’t my point. For a US Court to grant a divorce to an American Citizen there must have been some weight to the fact there was a marriage existence in the first place.”

Did you not see what I said a person working in family court said. The petitioner can say anything she wants. What proof does the court have????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Marriage certificate???

NOPE.

Petitioner claims a marriage.
Obama Sr didn’t respond. Didn’t dispute anything.

Divorce granted.


40 posted on 04/20/2012 5:29:53 PM PDT by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson