[Cringing Negativism Network]

It’s a bit awkward to defend Romney on this board.

However I’m starting to sense from various postings - originating from Mr. Thompson and various Mods, that honest information which (can) be construed as beneficial to Romney, without being deliberately boosting him - seems to fly under the “zot” radar.

It’s ok it seems to pick a lane, between the marxist extremist Obama, and the mushy socialist Romney. Even defend that selection, energetically.

But not to pick the Romney lane, against anyone else but Obama.

Seems workable. :D

JR or Mods, feel free to refute that interpretation, definitely trying to intuit how to avoid going too far, without ending up de-facto supporting Obama - which simply is not an option. Ever.

Thanks.

[ansel12]

Romney’s family was not polygamist.

What do you mean by that? The Romneys went to Mexico to keep practicing polygamy, it was a Mormon polygamy compound that Mitt's father was born on, the Romneys are still Mormon royalty and power, they just quit practicing polygamy and came back to America where they have run two straight generational attempts to take the Presidency of our nation.

[unkus]

I agree with you, CNN.

I see no one refuting you.

I get the impression by many that Romney and 0bama are basically equal.

[Theodore R.]

It’s a bit awkward to defend Romney on this board.

We absolutely have to vote for Romney on Nov. 6. We should now start practicing doing this in the remaining primaries. That way we can leave our clothespins at home on Nov. 6, as we will already have experience voting for Romney. Barbara Bush said flatly we must vote for Mittens.

[Scooter100]

It’s a bit awkward to defend Romney on this board. However I’m starting to sense from various postings - originating from Mr. Thompson and various Mods, that honest information which (can) be construed as beneficial to Romney, without being deliberately boosting him - seems to fly under the “zot” radar.

Oh-oh, you have mentioned it, not good. You've been detected. For you see, the "zot radar"...is always circling, always tracking, always watching over your shoulder. Because if you mention it, if you're afraid of the "zot", then your fear must be an indication that you harbor feelings contrary to the philosophy herein espoused. You see, those who think correctly, have no fear of the "zot". So if you are not thinking correctly, ipso facto, you are by definition thinking of ideologies that are "against the collective". This cannot be tolerated. You must be eliminated. Everyone duck...before we're hit by the back-splatter! Q.E.D., I think.

But, on the other hand, I've just called attention to CNN's calling attention to it....which means....oh, my Lord, what have I done?