Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Struggling Obama super-PAC asks Clinton for help (Hillary says no?)
The Hill ^ | 4/21/12 | Cameron Joseph

Posted on 04/21/2012 9:07:42 PM PDT by Libloather

Struggling Obama super-PAC asks Clinton for help
By Cameron Joseph - 04/21/12 10:15 AM ET

Priorities USA, a super-PAC focused on reelecting President Obama, has asked former President Bill Clinton to help them pick up the pace on fundraising.

Democratic donors have been resistant to giving to the group. This is partly because of liberals' hesitation about super-PACs in general and partly because Sean Sweeney and Bill Burton, the two former White House staffers heading the group, aren't as plugged in to the fundraising world as those helping some of the Republican groups, which include heavy-hitters like Karl Rove and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R).

If Clinton decides to help Piorities USA that could go a long way toward wooing some rich donors off the sidelines. According to Businessweek, he's leaning towards aiding them.

The group, which is headed by former Obama White House staffers, has struggled to keep pace with pro-GOP outside groups. It has raised $8.8 million with $5 million in the bank, according to new reports, while the pro-Romney Restore Our Future has brought in $51.9 million and still has $6.5 million left after an expensive primary.

The pro-Republican American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS have raised nearly $100 million and plan to spend a total of $250 million on this election. If Priorities USA and other pro-Democratic super-PACs can't pick up the fundraising pace Democrats and their allies could be vastly outspent by their opposite groups this year.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; clinton; hillary; obama
ZERO conflict of interest.
1 posted on 04/21/2012 9:07:48 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I thought O’Bumbler was going to raise a billion dollars because of his well oiled campaign machine.

This article makes it sound like the Dems are panicking.

2 posted on 04/21/2012 9:12:52 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

They are panicking. They may be raising 30 or 40 million, but they are spending much of it just keeping it all together.

The real good news is that the Dems reached their high point a couple years ago and they’ve tapped all the big donors already.

It’s all small donations from here on.


3 posted on 04/21/2012 10:21:58 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

There are a couple of observations here:

First, about two weeks ago...I watched an interview where they were talking about the expenditures of the Obama camp. The strategy in 2008 was spend big early, then coast along (assuming that McCain really didn’t have a strong vote). The people in charge are the same group from 2008, and one would suspect they are using the exact same strategy. If they have maxed out at this point on big-name contribution folks....they will be broke by late summer.

Second, if Clinton knows that Hillary is the likely replacement on the ticket for VP....he’ll help. If he knows this isn’t the case...I doubt that he really wants to help. Based on recent health comments in the news...I’m not even sure if he’d appreciate traveling around and making appearances anyway.

Third and final, I think whoever is in the running for VP...has to drag along a fair number of contributors. So there might be some games going on. The President may not have many choices about who to select for the position. This character is hoping that he can get the big push in 2016 by being the VP for four years of Obama....so coughing up the contribution folks...may be worth the money.


4 posted on 04/22/2012 1:33:01 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

4 more years of Obama is a disgusting thought!


5 posted on 04/22/2012 3:51:00 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (ma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

But but but the Washington Post just ran a story about how everything is just fine with Obama’s fund raising. Gee I don’t understand - the WaPo wouldn’t lie or mislead would it?


6 posted on 04/22/2012 4:21:24 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
It’s all small donations from here on.

Wouldn't surprise me if they figure a way to accept the Bridge Cards for donations..................

7 posted on 04/22/2012 5:14:12 AM PDT by varon (The patriots stand watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

What would be the optimal time for Joe to have a ‘disabling stoke’.


8 posted on 04/22/2012 6:55:11 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson