Skip to comments.Occupy to Protest of 'Islamic Apartheid Conference'
Posted on 04/22/2012 2:14:13 PM PDT by Milagros
Occupy demonstrators at Temple University in Philadelphia are planning to protest an Islamic Apartheid Conference on Monday featuring activist Pamela Geller and sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
The conference, billed as a universal symbol of support and encouragement for women, gays [and] religious minorities, including Muslims themselves, who are figuratively and physically imprisoned by Shariah and Islam, will feature Geller, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch and activist Nonie Darwish as speakers. The event comes on the heels of an Israeli Apartheid Week hosted at the university last month.
To counter it, Occupy Temple is joining with the International Socialist Organization, Students for Justice in Palestine and the Party for Socialism and Liberation for a multi-racial fightback against these racist hatemongers.
“To counter it, Occupy Temple is joining...”
Wow, I got the feeling that these Occupy types were almost having a “religious experience” with their protests, but had no idea that now have their own Temple! Do they have a choir?
The statue of Gaia inside the Temple is to die for.
As usual, the Left engages in projection when they use the term “racist hatemongers”.
There will be violence at this event. Islam permits it.
“O ye who believe! Smite upon the neck the infidels wherever you find them.” Koran 9-5
MSM coverage will consist of crickets.
For my money, Geller, Spencer, Deng, and Horowitz — though little recognized as such — are the ultimate front-line cultural warriors of our day.
While we have the Chamber of Commerce and such “Republicans” as Grover Norquist cozying up to the CAIR types, we have this small, brave crew exposing and confronting the Muslim threat where it is and as it is.
If they lose their fight, we are all goners — at least in terms of our liberties.
Grover Norquist is married to a Mooselimb and as Islamist Females are NOT allowed (though the contrary is permitted in this misogynist cult) to be married to NON-Muslim males, chances are pretty good that he has converted.
Moreover, his support and appeasement of Radical Islam/Sharia beginning with facilitating access to the highest levels of Government (and EVERY Agency) to include the White Hut going back to Boosh (who he convinced to claim that Islam was a "Religion of Peace") as well as helping to place radical Islamist in charge of the Moozie Chaplain Program (vetting all Imams, much like leaving the proverbial Fox in charge of the hen house) makes him one of the most DANGEROUS, TRAITOROUS, BOTTOM-FEEDING, SNAKES, pretending to be a "Conservative."
I spit on this slime-ball, cockroach!
What a bunch of clueless, commie, Moonbats!
There are those who see any criticism of Muslim fundamentalists as racist, and therefore to be opposed. Others, like Women Against Fundamentalism, while fighting against the racialization of Islam, see as both racist and sexist the reification of Black communities as separate 'others' in whose internal conflicts and political struggles ...Racialized Boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the Anti-Racist Struggle - Page 109 - Floya Anthias, Nira Yuval-Davis, Harriet Cain - 1993 - 240 pages
Europeans criticize Muslim intolerance of other (non-Muslim) points of view - basic liberties and natural freedoms - and for their justifying violence and terrorism in defending Islam against its enemies. Meanwhile, Muslim apologists condemn the West in general...Europe and Its Muslim Minorities: Aspects of Conflict, Attempts at Accord - Page 53 - Amikam Nachmani - Sussex Academic Press, Feb 1, 2010 - 246 pages
There are those who complain that it is practically impossible to criticize Muslim immigrants, not even the militant political Islamists among them who occasionally resort to extremism. It is "logically absurd and morally unacceptable", they argue, that writers who speak out against militant Islam are immediately branded racist:
As soon as a writer expresses an opinion against Islamism, immediately someone on the left leaps to his feet and claims that because the majority of Muslims are dark-skinned, he who criticises it is racist. This is logically absurd and morally unacceptable. Martin [Amis] is not a racist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.