Skip to comments.Documents Released in George Zimmerman Case
Posted on 04/23/2012 12:06:41 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
SEMINOLE COUNTY, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) - Just hours after George Zimmerman walked out of the Seminole County jail $150,000 bail, the court unsealed several documents. (see below for documents)
Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester issued an order to unseal several documents. According to one of the documents released Monday, Zimmerman's arraignment was pushed forward from May 29 to May 8.
Zimmerman's location is being kept a secret for his safety and could be outside the state of Florida.
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxorlando.com ...
I am not illiterate... must be some other “people” being referred to.
My husband and I both heard in the early reports that the shots were fired by and the baby snatched by a skinny black woman with blond hair. We heard that several times but then they stopped. The woman they are holding sure isn't skinny.
Hah, good one. It will be like the end of “The Firm”, when the FBI brings in a dozen guys each with their own dolly, and there’s one manilla folder holding ten pages of billing records on the table.
>> Did you not see Angela Corey’s news conference?
>> It was one of the most disgusting news conference I’ve ever witnessed.
Yeah, but I heard that it wasn’t too bad — as a re-election campaign speech.
Don’t feel bad! I couldn’t find the documents at first either!
“If Zimmerman goes free the riots and the murders that follow (with full Obama support) will result in an even more energetic Dem turnout.”
How could it cause a more energetic turnout for the treasoncrats?
I see the possible riots as the starting point of the second civil war IMO, to which the left and their entitlement class jackals will lose.
Wouldn't that be more in line with an Obama declaration of martial law? I mean rioting in just Florida wouldn't be enough reason, right?
I say this because it makes the most sense IF a suspesion/cancellation of elections is what Obama wants (and I think that's EXACTLY what he wants).
“So much for delaying it until after the November elections.”
I’m pretty sure hussein needs to get the rioting started so he can declare martial law and “postpone” elections.
As I understand it, the basic demographic groups that gave Obama his greatest support in 2008 are operating at lower levels of enthusiasm than expected at this point in the 2012 election cycle. The blacks, the women and the young need (from a Dem viewpoint) a big kick in the you know what to re-energize them and get them out to vote in November. The Zimmerman case was "chosen" for that purpose.
It is LONG settled that the defendant has a right to appear in non-prison garb. Prosecutors hate that because it takes one of their mind game advantages away.
Perhaps we need a loser pays rule in criminal cases.
Since the boat has more holes in it than the Titanic, it will be forgotten soon.
But that's OK.
Even though it is very rare, eventually a non-minority race member will kill a minority race member in self-defense and they can start over again.
The arrogance of these bloated overpaid agents of the government are really beyond description.
Then why was it discussed and referenced in the Case Documents?
Nobody wants to be a part of this hot potato.
Yes. At the link, scroll DOWN, and DOWN, and DOWN, and DOWN, and DOWN, and DOWN, and then, on the LEFT is a list of documents.
Even though the titles don't seem to relate to the Zimmerman case, that is because they are mostly legal mumbo jumbo.
Any defense lawyer worth his salt can drag out discovery in a murder case for at least a year. This is NOT gonna go to trial before the election.
Now let me get this straight...of all the stuff they could have released they chose Zimmerman’s 2005 arrest report and an injunction for protection his wife filed (but not the one he filed against her)?
I’ve seen a lot of crazy stuff in this case but I have never seen such a blatant attempt to discredit a defendant as this. Is it even legal to only release information which is prejudicial toward only one party in a case like this?
Further check on injunctions needed, maybe was not wife! What I heard.
I think they are wrong. It's admissible hearsay. But, it's useless to the state because the credibility is bottom of the barrel.
There is also a question of timing of admissibility. More can come in at the immunity hearing, than at trial. The state will be allowed to present the affidavit as part of the immunity hearing, and the Judge may consider it. Same way the judge considers evidence that is ruled inadmissible to a jury.