Meghan Kelly were discussing some of the documents with two other lawyers. They were all in agreement that the affidavit from the past girl friend was not admissible in this case. It was only relevant in the bond hearing. (and to poison public appearance against Z)
-- They were all in agreement that the affidavit from the past girl friend was not admissible in this case.
I think they are wrong. It's admissible hearsay. But, it's useless to the state because the credibility is bottom of the barrel.
There is also a question of timing of admissibility. More can come in at the immunity hearing, than at trial. The state will be allowed to present the affidavit as part of the immunity hearing, and the Judge may consider it. Same way the judge considers evidence that is ruled inadmissible to a jury.
posted on 04/23/2012 1:33:42 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson