Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich daughter: Campaign to 'reassess' standing
AP ^ | 4/24/2012 | AP

Posted on 04/24/2012 9:51:08 AM PDT by tatown

WASHINGTON (AP) — Newt Gingrich's daughter says the former House speaker will "reassess" his campaign after the votes are tallied in Delaware, potentially setting the stage for his exit from the Republican presidential race.

Jackie Gingrich Cushman said Tuesday that her father's campaign has slimmed down but is still winning over voters who aren't yet sold on Mitt Romney, who has effectively clinched the GOP presidential nomination.

Despite trailing Romney in convention delegates and fundraising, Gingrich has vowed to campaign until the party's late-summer convention in Florida.

Gingrich is carrying more than $4.3 million in debt and has been spending more money than he is taking in.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: ap4obama; ap4romney; bsheadline; de2012; delaware; depressturnout; enemedia; fauxprimarynews; gingrich; gopedirtytricks; mittsdirtytricks; mustbeaprimaryday; newt; newt2012; newtgingrich; onceshameonyou; reassessstrategy; reassesstactics; romney; romneydirtytrick; romneymedia; twiceshameonme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2012 9:51:11 AM PDT by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tatown

I read a few pieces where people thought that Newt wanted to go out on a high note with a strong showing in DE. Are there any current numbers from there?


2 posted on 04/24/2012 9:53:45 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I haven’t seen anything new from DE.


3 posted on 04/24/2012 9:55:20 AM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Has anybody seen anything from any of the states that have not yet voted in the primary?


4 posted on 04/24/2012 9:58:43 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

Since Santorum dropped out, they stopped conducting primary polls. Over at RealClearPolitics I’ve seen nothing for weeks. It’s just part of the media narrative that the rest of our votes just don’t matter.


5 posted on 04/24/2012 10:02:57 AM PDT by CountryClassSF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tatown

“....Romney, who has effectively clinched the GOP presidential nomination.”

WHOA! When did he do that!?


6 posted on 04/24/2012 10:03:34 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown

It really P*sses me off when candidates drop out before all the states get to vote. Same as election night when the news people call the races before all states get to vote.


7 posted on 04/24/2012 10:04:18 AM PDT by Grumpybutt ("Mothers go where angels fear to tread....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt

That’s why we need a National Primary Day.


8 posted on 04/24/2012 10:06:18 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

I think it was a couple years ago...


9 posted on 04/24/2012 10:10:33 AM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tatown
Gingrich is carrying more than $4.3 million in debt and has been spending more money than he is taking in.

Whoa!
10 posted on 04/24/2012 10:11:46 AM PDT by Gennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CountryClassSF
It’s just part of the media narrative that the rest of our votes just don’t matter.

I think it has more to do with money. Polling gets expensive, depending on the state and methodology. I don't think Newt has any money to do it and Milt doesn't care anymore.

11 posted on 04/24/2012 10:12:30 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

True. A couple of years ago he clinched it with the GOP-e didn’t he.


12 posted on 04/24/2012 10:13:31 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tatown

13 posted on 04/24/2012 10:15:15 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Campaign?


14 posted on 04/24/2012 10:15:45 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown

As a money raiser, perhaps Newt’s campaign should sell “NO ROMBAMA” bumper stickers.


15 posted on 04/24/2012 10:15:45 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

IF

you read that, you need to post the link, or stop gettting on Newt threads telling bald-faced lies.
16 posted on 04/24/2012 10:23:40 AM PDT by true believer forever (GO NEWT! On to Tampa - hang tight - we can do this!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

He won this nomination process de facto when his operatives were given such strong reign over Palin’s VP campaign.

Yet, much can still happen before Election Day. Things could turn on a dime.


17 posted on 04/24/2012 10:25:41 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grumpybutt
It really P*sses me off when candidates drop out before all the states get to vote.

It costs a lot of money to campaign. When the inflow of donations tapers off, so does the campaigning.

18 posted on 04/24/2012 10:28:26 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

“....Romney, who has effectively clinched the GOP presidential nomination.”
WHOA! When did he do that!?”

The day Sarah Palin announced she wasn’t running....


19 posted on 04/24/2012 10:29:41 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Methinks maybe dirty tricks last 24 hours to depress opposition to Romney, since the text rather continues to not match the gossipy headline.


20 posted on 04/24/2012 10:30:52 AM PDT by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt IS Galt. (& Always has been.) 1144 isn't here, yet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tatown

I will stand with Newt until/unless HE tells me he’s out.


21 posted on 04/24/2012 10:32:50 AM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

You are correct. It snuck past me on initial reading. Good catch!


22 posted on 04/24/2012 10:33:01 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD

If Newt Gingrich does, officially, drop out of the ‘12 race for POTUS, then who should the majorities of conservative voters/very conservative voters vote for, instead, in the ‘12 race for POTUS, and how does anybody make such a choice really happen, if it’s not going to be voting in the majority for RINO Mitt Romney? Virgil Goode? Gary Johnson? “Blank” the race for ‘12 POTUS? Write-In somebody else-the same person, as a majority of conservative/very conservative voters? How is the U.S. not on its last legs, as a capitalistic country?


23 posted on 04/24/2012 10:34:19 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Why would a campaign say that right BEFORE the state is voting?

Doesn’t she see how that will hurt his GOTV effort?


24 posted on 04/24/2012 10:38:48 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
That’s why we need a National Primary Day.

You mean in order to guarantee that the richest candidate wins all the time? The deepest pockets would just flood the airways in all the big markets in every key state and win by default forever. You think guys like Santorum or Newt had a hard time competing this time around, under your plan they wouldn't even have a chance. Your national primary day proposal eliminates the ability for a guy with few resources like Santorum to gain traction over the course of a primary and at least have an opportunity to emerge. If you ever, ever, ever want more candidates in touch with the grass roots running for office, you absolutely do not want a national primary day. Not saying what we have is all that great, but national primary day is simply an atrocious alternative.

25 posted on 04/24/2012 10:39:09 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand

Please see post 20.


26 posted on 04/24/2012 10:40:16 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I think we need a Conservative Primary, so that we all get behind ONE candidate who will run against the GOP establishment candidate for the GOP nomination.

We can’t beat a McCain or Romney if we are splitting our vote between 3-5 conservatives. We did the same thing in 2008 as we did this year and it does not work.

If there were 5 conservatives running against GHW Bush in 1980, there would have been no Reagan. Bush would have walked away with it just as Romney is doing.

Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.


27 posted on 04/24/2012 10:46:33 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
you read that, you need to post the link

I don't have to post crap. Buy a Google button and do your own legwork. There are a bunch of editorials on the subject. Just this week, Newt himself said in an interview that...

"I think we need to take a deep look at what we are doing," Gingrich told NBC News in an exclusive interview on Monday. "We will be in North Carolina tomorrow night and we will look and see what the results are." He acknowledged that he would have to "reassess" his campaign depending on how he fares in Delaware, a winner-take-all state with 17 delegates at stake.

If you are not aware, "reassess" is political code for drop out.

28 posted on 04/24/2012 10:47:24 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CountryClassSF; MulberryDraw
Since Santorum dropped out, they stopped conducting primary polls. Over at RealClearPolitics I’ve seen nothing for weeks. It’s just part of the media narrative that the rest of our votes just don’t matter.

Yes, and I guess you're saying that the candidates' judgement doesn't matter either?

What if we shorten your statement to the nub:

Since Santorum dropped out, ...the rest of our votes just don’t matter.

Damn that Santorum. If he'd stayed in then RCP would do polls and MY vote would still matter! wow.

29 posted on 04/24/2012 10:48:15 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
I think we need a Conservative Primary, so that we all get behind ONE candidate who will run against the GOP establishment candidate for the GOP nomination. We can’t beat a McCain or Romney if we are splitting our vote between 3-5 conservatives. We did the same thing in 2008 as we did this year and it does not work

Amen, brother.

30 posted on 04/24/2012 10:48:19 AM PDT by old and tired (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

What about a national party day primary #1 to whittle the list of potential candidates. Then have numerous widely-televised debates moderated not at all. Turn on the cameras and mikes and let the 4 or 5 candidates have at it. Let US decide what we think. Great TV too!

Then after a few months, have a national party primary day #2 to select the Presidential candidate. The convention would then nominate and select the veep and everyone give speeches.

Nowhere is it written that we have to do things the way we have been doing them to select a party’s candidates.


31 posted on 04/24/2012 10:54:23 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand

An honest Republican Party selection process WOULD produce a Conservative candidate. Elites know it and that’s why it’s been done the way it has been.


32 posted on 04/24/2012 10:57:13 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; Lazlo in PA

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/24/primary-republican-gingrich-live?newsfeed=true


33 posted on 04/24/2012 11:00:18 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Whether intentional or not, this news item is geared to dissuade American voters, in these primary States today, from voting for Gingrich. What other purpose? Why would the Gingrich campaign make this announcement ahead of voting? They wouldn’t. Please see post 20, this thread.


34 posted on 04/24/2012 11:05:26 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Gawd, that picture is freakin’ horrible. Penguin bites can really hurt. LOL


35 posted on 04/24/2012 11:08:44 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Why should Iowa determine who the candidate is, how many candidates are eliminated because these little states don’t like them? It’s not fair that the race is already decided before the Texas primary.


36 posted on 04/24/2012 11:10:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Oh please, how many primary voters today would really read an article from the Guardian in the UK and have that sway their opinion?

LOL


37 posted on 04/24/2012 11:12:15 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
You mean in order to guarantee that the richest candidate wins all the time?

As if they don't now?!?!?!

38 posted on 04/24/2012 11:13:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Why should Iowa determine who the candidate is, how many candidates are eliminated because these little states don’t like them? It’s not fair that the race is already decided before the Texas primary.

Hey, I agree. I don't like that Iowa goes first all the time. How about we press the party to mix it up more? I'd be all for that. I am not saying the way we are doing it now is necessarily good, I am just saying a national primary day would be even worse.

39 posted on 04/24/2012 11:15:52 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
As if they don't now?!?!?!

McCain ran on a shoestring budget during some of the 2008 campaign when everyone had written him off. He didn't have much money to spend and he won anyway.

All I am saying is a national primary day would virtually guarantee the richest candidate(s) swamps the key media markets and wins the nomination every time. Candidates would never have an opportunity to emerge and get stronger as the primary season progresses. It's just not a good idea at all.

40 posted on 04/24/2012 11:21:48 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
"You mean in order to guarantee that the richest candidate wins all the time?"

Not in a runoff. The best Conservative merely needs to make it to #2, then consolidate the Conservative vote. Project that scenario onto 2012, and this thread could be about Gingrich announcing his VP choice...

41 posted on 04/24/2012 11:24:18 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tatown
Another "nothing" article, just a misleading headline!
42 posted on 04/24/2012 11:25:17 AM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Whether intentional or not, this news item is geared to dissuade American voters, in these primary States today, from voting for Gingrich.

I don't think so. I don't care if Newt isn't even in this anymore. He and Santorum are still on ballots and available for the non Milt vote. I will be voting non Milt shortly here. If anything, I think this talk pushes down Milt voters. Why bother to vote, when your guy has this "sewed up"?

43 posted on 04/24/2012 11:25:31 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
That’s why we need a National Primary Day.

Yea, but if we did that how in the hell could the GOPe manipulate the selection?

44 posted on 04/24/2012 11:28:49 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Dear Newt,

Please announce:

1. That your name will remain on all ballots in all states.

2. That you strongly encourage the voters to rock the establishment, rock the vote, and vote non-romney.

3. That especially those states at the end of the process should register a protest that the GOP-establishment thinks their out-of-control attack ads and media management have reduced everyone’s choices to zero. ROCK THAT ARROGANCE and STICK IT TO ‘EM! Vote on your ballot ANYTHING BUT ROMNEY!


45 posted on 04/24/2012 11:28:57 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil! (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“That’s why we need a National Primary Day.”


If we had a national primary day, the candidate with the most money would likely win quite easily, since grassroots candidates wouldn’t be able to concentrate on winning Iowa, NH or SC and then building upon that momentum to raise money and campaign in other states. I think it would be fairer if different states got to go first once in a while, but we should maintain a system in which primaries are a week or so apart.


46 posted on 04/24/2012 11:31:28 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dforest

You are correct; ordinary primary voters won’t hear it from this UK outlet. But I understood this link was to be typical of what the news media in general are reporting today, not an isolated hidden news tidbit.

My mistake, I suppose, but is it one worthy of condescension...? Well, you for one thought so.


47 posted on 04/24/2012 11:35:15 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

First of all, the Primary Season is way too long, which of course benefits the candidates with the most money.

I like the idea of breaking it out into maybe 3 primary days, spread out over one month. Each of the days has a mix of small states/large states, so that the number of electoral votes on each day is roughly the same.......after each one, the bottom one or two candidates must drop out.


48 posted on 04/24/2012 11:36:15 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: onyx; RitaOK

A nothing article is right.

The campaign has already indicated it would reassess after Delaware. I read about that earlier and not from anything the daughter said.

This headline makes it sound like this reassessment will lead to a drop out, and doesn’t even mention it happens AFTER Delaware, and people haven’t even voted yet.

But we have people here claiming it’s all innocent and pure as the wind drive snow.


49 posted on 04/24/2012 11:36:36 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Hadn’t considered that angle. Thanks.


50 posted on 04/24/2012 11:36:36 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson