Posted on 04/24/2012 7:55:54 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe the Secret Service has too much testosterone.
Would more female agents have made the sex scandal involving special agents and Colombian prostitutes less likely?
No one can answer that with any certainty, but the scandal does raise the issue of gender diversity among those who are willing to die for the president. There is very little diversity among them — about 90 percent of Secret Service agents are men.
The probability of the scandal happening “would have been reduced significantly” if there were more women on the Cartagena detail, said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.).
Greater gender diversity can set a different tone in “recreational liberties,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.)
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Well, when the people the SS are protecting get half a foot shorter, then maybe they can hire more women.
Maybe when I see libs bitching about jobs that are way over-represented by women and saying how bad it is, and that real actions must be taken and laws must be written to fix it to demand men be represented equally, then I will give two sh1ts about gender equality.
“Secret Service needs more women in its racks”
Allow me to correct your typo to:
“Secret Service needs more women with racks”.
Heh, like it matters about about gender - it is all about decency, honesty, integrity, and much more! These folks had none of that. I care little about the gender, but I do care about the decency of those that serve our President.
I would say that honesty and decency starts from the top - what say you?
I think the ss should be completely staffed by gay midgets. All diversity issues would be covered.
.
.
.
Secret Service needs more women in tank-tops.
Secret Service needs more women in its wanks.
I think Obama’s SS should be all blck women. Fat ones, too. Kinda like the DMV or the TSA. Nobody will mess with them!
Didn’t their recent recruiting event yield any decent prospects ???
LOL...it is a sad thing indeed when a commonsense statement like yours shines like a flashlight out of a dark night!
But that is the truth. If you aren’t professional, makes no difference if you are a glitter-bomb throwing transsexual (from another thread!) or a white male...you just aren’t professional.
Unless the women hired are primarily lesbian, in which case they will work hard to drive straight men out of the Service. What you will be left with will be a force that will be uninterested in taking a bullet to protect the persons they guard, but it will be just FABULOUS.
I just love the thought process of “man hating” women.
After all, they have unleashed the queer agenda upon us and are endangering the lives of our servicemen by placing women in combat positions and other positions requiring strength they don’t have, both physiologically or physically.
There are plenty of women in the Secret Service, the men just need to be of better CHARACTER!
That’s probably exactly what they mean.
Fat, minority, unionized women with attitudes precluding them from working in any private sector capacity.
You wouldn’t happen to have a gif of that rotational head thing, would you?
Bad character corrupts good morals.
Title should read:
SECRET SERVICE NEEDS MORE HOOKERS IN IT’S RACKS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.