Looks like third party for me. I refuse to vote for either Marxist.
posted on 04/25/2012 7:25:42 AM PDT
("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
Rationality is baneful to some...
posted on 04/25/2012 7:28:28 AM PDT
(the system is rigged...)
Looks like third party for me.
Are you telling me you would rather just let an abortionist, homo-agenda coddling, socialized healthcare advocating, amnesty-loving, gun grabbing, liberal judge appointing Marxist get a second term than vote for Mitt??? You need your head examined! /s
posted on 04/25/2012 7:30:38 AM PDT
Since I know there’s no way on earth Maobama can win the electoral votes from the state I live in, I’m thinking of supporting this Constitution Party candidate-
Point 8 is wrong.
“A Marxist rubber stamp is not as dangerous as a Marxist lame duck.”
If we get real conservatives in the House and Senate, I thing the country will be better off with a lame duck Obama being rendered useless and neutered than Mitt with a mandate.
In any event - I will not be voting for Mitt.
posted on 04/25/2012 7:45:24 AM PDT
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson