Nuanced = Selective Enforcement
“nuanced federal immigration policy”
“It seems to me that the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally and who’s not,” Roberts said.
Lalalalala . . . I can’t hear you.
While questions are reasonably meaningless, it appears it may be a split decision and NOT a good split decision.
...INCLUDING the illegal alien Barry Obama.
Well at least with one judge sitting this one out we will not get the usual 5-4 politically biased decision but we may get a 4-4 crap sandwich which by default goes in favor of the Feds.
Arizona is not attempting to implement a stronger law that the feds so what is the problem? They are simply making sure that Federal law is obeyed even though the Feds deliberately fail miserably in one of their very FEW Constitutionally mandated tasks.
If Arizona cannot do this then, California must be banned from having stricter air pollution regulations for cars. What is the difference? After all, the more restrictive CA emissions regulations impacts the so grossly misused Commerce Clause by forcing auto manufactures to comply with different laws in California than the rest of the country.
Or how about states which have stricter gun laws than the Feds?
Seems the communist filth in Washington wants it both ways and regardless we get it in the end, literally and figuratively.
To summarize, the Feds will punish a state which does not make sure residents follow Federal laws/regulations and the Feds will punish states which do make sure residents follow Federal laws/regulations.
Therefore the actions of the Dallas city police and the Texas Rangers to track down and apprehend Lee Harvey Oswald were injurious to public order and comity.
He should therefore be released from local custody until such time as proper federal officials are on hand to conduct a proper search that considers all interests.
The federal government has limited resources and must counsel the application of those resources against the ability to receive calls for assistance.
Can someone explain to me the difference between Kagan recusing herself in this case and not recusing herself in the Obamacare case? Thank you.