Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Take the Secret Service Scandal Personally ^ | April 25, 2012 | Emmett Tyrrell

Posted on 04/26/2012 5:32:32 AM PDT by Kaslin

Washington -- When you have a young woman screaming in a hallway about some sort of grievance she has with you, you have a problem. Even a Secret Service agent, surrounded by his buddies, has a problem. I know about this sort of thing from my work in the archives pursuant to my researches as a presidential historian.

One thinks back to the late 1940s of Elizabeth Bentley, an American spying for the Soviet Union. She raised an intolerable ruckus outside a hotel room with one, possibly two, Soviet intelligence operatives -- both male. Her involvement with one had been romantic, but the cad let her down. Possibly, he did not pay for her turkey sandwich. Possibly, he left other bills cooling on the table. At any rate, there was hell to pay. She had a set of lungs on her like a bull moose and a face to boot. When she let out a yell, it was deafening. Of course, the Russians were terrified. Shortly thereafter, she renounced Communism, and they were glad to get back to Stalin's Russia.

Another example is more recent, and in this the Secret Service was almost without doubt innocent. Miss Monica Lewinsky was left to cool her heels in a White House gatehouse while her truelove dallied with another vamp. She caught on and fumed. She looked menacingly at the furniture. The Secret Service is trained for dangerous operations, but this was close to the limit. Luckily, she was admitted to the White House before she did real damage, but then all hell broke loose for poor Bill. It is a mistake to toy with an irascible woman, even an irascible woman of easy virtue.

I do not know the details of the imbroglio involving the Secret Service agent who attempted to stiff the Colombian cutie on her bill in steamy Cartagena. We shall have to await Hollywood's treatment of it, but he acted very unwisely. We do know that as many as ten other Secret Service agents, along with members of the military, were playing animal house with him. They apparently planned to party when they landed in Colombia. One agent even took a girl back to the hotel where the president was to stay a few days later. This suggests that the event was not isolated. Apparently, a whole culture of laxness has descended upon the once proud Secret Service. I cannot imagine such goings on during the Reagan years, when I was familiar with the President's bodyguards. They were conscientious to the utmost, and, as they proved, brave. I had them and something like 240 other guards and White House personnel in and around my home when the president came to dinner in 1988. They were the best.

What has happened, and when did it start? Did it begin with Bill Clinton? I rather think so. One of the Arkansas state troopers with whom I became familiar suggested as much. He was a well-educated man and at one time a friend of Bill's. He told me, "Clinton's treating his Secret Service detail the way he treated his Arkansas trooper detail." My friend was referring to Clinton's propensity for giving his bodyguards the "residuals," the women that he had tired of or that did not measure up.

I have known Secret Service agents as far back as the Nixon years. They were always first rate and straight as an arrow. They were devoted to their principle. I remember when Spiro Agnew had to leave the vice presidency, his Secret Service detail on their off-hours moved his effects from his office. I doubt such loyalty is practiced today. A source for The American Spectator tells the indefatigable Jeffrey Lord that owing to Liberal bugaboos such as affirmative action for minorities and women, "the bar was lowered significantly. Now that affects ALL hires of the Service regardless of race." As a consequence, when combined with "the societal attitudes of the latest generations and their general lack of education, commitment and reality," the result is a "dumbed down" agency. And our source goes on to say Cartagena was "only the tip of the iceberg."

Can the Secret Service recover? Some are calling this scandal the worst in its history. Actually, the Secret Service was born of scandal. Thomas Craughwell tells us in his book, "Stealing Lincoln's Body," that the agency was set up in 1865 to combat counterfeiting. Half the paper money in the Midwest was counterfeit. The Secret Service was successful in part because it hired as agents wayward counterfeiters. Such agents were great at putting the cuffs on active counterfeiters, but somehow the counterfeiters' booty kept disappearing. The answer was to bring in incorruptible new leaders such as Chicago's Chief of Police Elmer Washburn, who brought with him his own kind of incorruptible agents, for instance, the agent who broke the plot by counterfeiters to steal President Abraham Lincoln's body in 1876, Captain P. D. Tyrrell.

In a new biography of Lincoln's son Robert, "Giant in the Shadows," Jason Emerson demonstrates how under Washburn the Service arose from corruption and became a police force of the first rank. Tyrrell, my great-great-grandfather, though from remote Chicago, became "one of the service's most outstanding operatives and later in his career would be considered one of the most distinguished law-enforcement officers in the country." You will understand why I, for one, am hoping for an Elmer Washburn to appear.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; emmetttyrrell; scandals; secretservice; usss

1 posted on 04/26/2012 5:32:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One can always hope. However, in my experience, virtue draws the ire of the depraved and evil attacks ensue.

2 posted on 04/26/2012 5:39:57 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I suspect the shenanigans were always present in the SS, but kept more discrete or covered up. Still, I can't help but believe it is part of a larger scheme by the 0bama regime.
3 posted on 04/26/2012 6:17:54 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm thinkin this is a result of Zero picking those who he felt a certain “kinship: to in that they would keep their mouths closed vis a vis certain activities of the POTUS....obviously the acceptance of such behavior amongst the troops was considered acceptable by the troops....which begs the question...what other behaviors have a blind eye been turned? Remember...leadership eminates from the top down.

Things that make you go HMMMMMMMMMMMM....

4 posted on 04/26/2012 6:30:42 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Tyrrell should read Seymour Hersh's book, The Dark Side of Camelot, on the behavior of some of the Secret Service agents in the Kennedy administration.

P. 244:

"Some of the agents and military aides who traveled with Kennedy, surfeited with available women, soon found themselves doing what the president was doing. Drinking and partying became a constant feature of presidential travel..." Hersh goes on to describe a party at Bing Crosby's estate in Palm Springs in Dec. 1962 as particularly wild.

5 posted on 04/26/2012 6:38:25 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
I suspect the shenanigans were always present in the SS, but kept more discrete or covered up

Same here. Probably happened on a smaller scale-maybe one guy and he was let go or resigned andit was kept quiet.

Too many people involved with this one to cover up.

I really don't think this has anything to do with Obama but more indicative of society itself..loosening of morals and the downward spiral we are in.

6 posted on 04/26/2012 6:45:59 AM PDT by trailhkr1 (All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When you have a clown in the White House, then the Secret Service becomes the Secret Circus.

7 posted on 04/26/2012 7:22:25 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

shhhhh... keep it on the down low

8 posted on 04/26/2012 7:45:11 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

And of course we believe EVERYTHING that good old Seymour reports don’t we??? The male version of Kitty Kelly

9 posted on 04/26/2012 7:46:56 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


10 posted on 04/26/2012 8:02:03 AM PDT by NEW YORKCITYGOPMAN ('he who creates something worthwhile, never dies.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Not at all. I know Hersh is not always reliable. But he does name a source for the party at Bing Crosby's estate and gives the name of the aide who was seen "banging a girl at the edge of the pool" (reportedly everyone there was naked including the President...the California state patrol was at a checkpoint at the edge of the estate and had to be told that the sounds they were hearing the partygoers make were coyotes).

It does fit in with other reports of how the Kennedys and their friends partied.

11 posted on 04/26/2012 10:54:17 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty; GOPsterinMA; DarthVader; Emperor Palpatine; Jewbacca
I suspect the shenanigans were always present in the SS, but kept more discrete or covered up. Still, I can't help but believe it is part of a larger scheme by the 0bama regime.

Yes it's a plan by Obama to replace them with these guys.

12 posted on 04/26/2012 11:20:18 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impy; The Sons of Liberty; DarthVader; Emperor Palpatine; Jewbacca
I've long thought that Obama sees himself as an AA Hitler. If the populace wasn't as heavily armed at it is, I think the damage he would have unleashed would have been worse.

He dreams of his own SA and SS. I don't doubt that at all.

13 posted on 04/26/2012 12:14:17 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson