Skip to comments.Obama Cites “National Security” As Reason For Bypassing Congress To Give $147 Million To Palestinian
Posted on 04/26/2012 6:15:14 AM PDT by SumProVita
And how is funding the terror-supporting Palestinians in our national security interests?
(Excerpt) Read more at weaselzippers.us ...
And, of COURSE, he bypassed Congress to do this!!!
If the kenyan usurper were REALLY an American, raised in America, with American culture and American values, he might understand just how hard and long people have to work to pay the taxes that he so freely fritters away to those who want us dead.
That’s not all either. Check this out:
US-Funded Palestinian Authority Childrens Show: Zion Is Satan With A Tail
...Sorry George, I believe the man when he said it!
Just using your money to finance his campaign again .
The Republicans said nothing and did nothing about it the first time why should the second time be any different
Obama’s Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes
OBAMA LIED: “Palestinian” Campaign Contributions NEVER RETURNED OR REFUNDED
Why, it's intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that........um.........er.........give me a minute........
I think it works like this: we give them money and they don't bomb stuff in our country.
Why doesn’t the Philistinian government just spend more money if their economy needs help?
Cause if B Wacky kept the money he'd just blow it on Larry dogs.
He cares more about Islamo-Nazi terrorists than US citizens and I can prove it. Compare his treatment of 911 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed to that of George Zimmerman.
This will allow the palis to invest in better knife sharpeners and more efficient explosives. This will make their killing quicker and, therefore, you and your family will suffer less when they kill you. Pure genius foreign policy, I say.
Palestinians are a figment of the devils imagination, a fragmented segment of islam’s insanity, a Rube Goldberg political hand tool the outraged muslim maniacs insist is the answer to problems they have created. No wonder BO invested our money in it.
US Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has come under a lot of fire for saying that the “Palestinians” are an invented people. Most have ridiculed Gingrich by pointing out there are clearly millions of Arabs living in so-called “Palestine.”
But Gingrich wasn’t talking about the physical presence of those people today, but rather the national identity they have adopted and the fact that most immigrated to the land not so long ago.
In a televised address on Al-Hekma TV last week, Hamas Minister of the Interior and of National Security Fathi Hammad basically backed up Gingrich’s assessment, acknowledging that the roots of most “Palestinians” are elsewhere in the Middle East, and that the Palestinian label is only a thin veneer.
Those pushing for a Palestinian state try to paint the Palestinian Arabs as somehow distinct from the Arabs round-about, and therefore in need of their own state. Not so, said Hammad. “Every Palestinian, in Gaza and throughout Palestine, can prove his Arab roots - whether from Saudi Arabia, from Yemen, or anywhere. We have blood ties.”
More than that, Hammad stated that the true regional background of most “Palestinians” is not in “Palestine.”
“Brothers, half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis,” exclaimed the Hamas minister.
Hammad’s remarks were undoubtedly never intended for a Western audience. Rather, he was pleading with Egypt and other neighboring states to supply Hamas-ruled Gaza with free fuel, which Hammad said Hamas would use “in order to continue to wage Jihad.”
The “conservative” House allows this to go on and on....
No. I don’t want $147 million to go to Palestinians. I want it to go toward the national debt. There. It’s a done deal.
What would YOU do if a member of the House?
What are the House rules that might impede what you wanted to do.
How much has been done by House members that goes unreported?
We need to think all this through before...we eat our own.
On this issue, they haven't done, and are evidently not going to do a damned thing.
B. He bypapssed Congress because of his contempt for the Constitution.
So what's the group's next rhetorical question?
On this issue, they haven’t done, and are evidently not going to do a damned thing.
How do you know this?
What would YOU do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.