Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thinking Can Undermine Religious Faith, Study Finds
LA Times ^ | April 27, 2012 | Amina Khan

Posted on 04/26/2012 7:47:20 PM PDT by lbryce

Scientists have revealed one of the reasons why some folks are less religious than others: They think more analytically, rather than going with their gut. And thinking analytically can cause religious belief to wane — for skeptics and true believers alike.

The study, published in Friday's edition of the journal Science, indicates that belief may be a more malleable feature of the human psyche than those of strong faith may think.

The cognitive origins of belief — and disbelief — traditionally haven't been explored with academic rigor, said lead author Will Gervais, a social psychologist at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agnostic; athesim; god; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: prov1813man

God does not exist within the parameters of time and space. We do, however. We cannot begin to understand the true nature of god no matter how hard we try.

And that, is really all there is. It is not possible to know. This is why the question is stupid.


41 posted on 04/26/2012 8:35:07 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Ridiculous, I am a thinker and GOD has saved me through Jesus Christ-even using logic at times, and extra Biblical Historical evidence to strengthen my faith in Him!~

-J.S.


42 posted on 04/26/2012 8:36:19 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I already preempted question like yours in post #14. So where did God come from? He’s existed for all eternity, no beginning, no end? Unlikely. God emerging from nothingness? God emerging from nothingness says a lot less about God, the Supreme Being (emerging from nothingness) than it does about the Universe, empty space(coming from nothingness).


43 posted on 04/26/2012 8:38:45 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: mamelukesabre

I should have said scientists. They are the ones demanding the godless base of science these days.

Science cannot scoff at anything.

It’s merely a tool. A nice, efficient, data gathering tool at that, but still just a tool.

The analysis of the data falls squarely into the realm of philosophy, something most scientists are in deep denial about judging by the responses of many on these threads.


45 posted on 04/26/2012 8:40:13 PM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Yeah, I loved that one. Apparently you’re more likely to believe in God if you can’t count correct change. Who knew?


46 posted on 04/26/2012 8:43:25 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
I've never come across any religious discussion dealing with God in which 'I don't know' seems a viable response.

Most often it's intellectual suicide to say I don't know--nobody wants that for an answer and it can be a very dull and short discussion. In any case, if you're really interested, the most intellectually rigorous form of I-don't-know that I've come across is in Hans Urs von Balthasar. Try his Presence and Thought: An Essay on the Religious Philosophy of Gregory of Nyssa if you are intellectually fit.

47 posted on 04/26/2012 8:43:52 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Don’t forget Romans 1.


48 posted on 04/26/2012 8:44:13 PM PDT by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Because God cannot bring His full presence into this dimension without destroying it, and in place of His presence there are cosmic forces and immutable laws that point subtly to His existence. There is One beyond our existence, that willed this existence to be. That will is present in this plane, and here takes the appearance of these forces and laws. IMO.


49 posted on 04/26/2012 8:44:59 PM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
It's easy to lose perspective within one’s own thoughts. The focus is temporary, like everything else.
50 posted on 04/26/2012 8:46:22 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dadfly

“actually the reverse is true. a more ridiculous assertion, completely ignorant of the history of science, could hardly be imagined.

the greatest scientists and thinkers ever born, people like boyle, faraday, newton, einstein, and i could go on and on described their work as attempts to discover the mind of God.”

Likewise, the list of great Athiest fathers of science is very short.


51 posted on 04/26/2012 8:48:37 PM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Too much thinking is how we got global warming.


52 posted on 04/26/2012 8:48:50 PM PDT by ThomasThomas ("Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This “Would-love-to-hear-some-answers-that-don’t-border-on-the-inane” from you sounds a lot like this “cognitive origins-of-belief—and-disbelief—traditionally-haven’t-been explored-with-academic rigor” from the article.

Both statements assume a shared understanding of what is inanity or what is academic rigor. It reminds me of Socrates, who many many years ago who insisted that for discussion to continue they should first agree that they are human.


53 posted on 04/26/2012 8:50:12 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: metmom

You know, as many of these intellectual wastes of time as I’ve seen float through the media over the years, I begin to conclude that many of them are efforts just to troll the thought-space for “oddball” and “radical” responses from the religeous side. It’s nice to see reams of cogent response and discussion of it here. :-)


54 posted on 04/26/2012 8:52:40 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: RobbyS
Well, this is a theory, and one based on certain assumptions about both religion and science. regarding Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the way that God was know to exist came through revelation, not by metaphysical reflection. As an elegant solution, maybe the God of the philosophers, as Pascal described them, but for him and for people of faith, the God of Abraham and Issac and Jacob is something else.

Well-put. It's an important distinction to stress.

56 posted on 04/26/2012 8:55:24 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Perhaps because he was alive at the end of the Nazi occupation was because God does exist and was protecting him, giving him the will to survive, inspiring others to help him survive.

What, then, of those who perished? God chose not to protect them, not to give them the will to survive and not to inspire others to help them?

57 posted on 04/26/2012 8:55:49 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Your mind is trapped in an existence defined by time and space. To understand how nonsensical your question is, you first have to imagine an existence without the parameter we call time. This is the existence of god. It is not possible for our minds to truly comprehend an existence without time so in the end it is folly.

But...I’ll give it a go anyway...

If there is no time for god, when did he “begin”?

See? that is a nonsensical question, is it not? If there is no time, then there is no beginning and no end. Church goers use the phrase “god is eternal” or “ever lasting” or “existed before creation”. All this is just primitive ways of saying god exists outside parameter of time and space.

Now, lets look at science. They say that time and space are constructs that exist only within the universe. The vacuum of space is not really a vacuum at all. It is filled with a substance that creates the dimensions we call time and space. Therefore, time only exists within the universe. Distance only exists within the universe. You can imagine them as being artificial constructs like a holodeck (star trek) or the matrix(of the movie). Prior to the “big bang” there was no time and there was no distance. If time and distance exist only within the universe, then where are you when you step just outside the universe? Go ahead and try to answer that question. Here’s a hint, you cant use distance to explain it because distance does not exist there.

You can’t answer that question. And that is just the way it is. You also cannot answer the question “from where did god come from” for the same reasons you cannot answer the question “what caused the big bang”.


58 posted on 04/26/2012 8:57:24 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Read the Critique of Pure Reason by Emmanuel Kant


59 posted on 04/26/2012 8:57:56 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
If I look at this logically, I see only three options: the universe is eternal, which according the the mathematics of eternity it is not, there is something greater than the universe which is eternal that brought forth the universe, or the universe itself sprung out of nothingness. This really boils down to one option: there has to be an uncaused cause (cause and effect).

I am working my way through this concept in the Sunday School class I teach. It took us three weeks to get the class to understand this logical conclusion. They have never been challenged to consider their Christianity through the prism of logic and reason, yet they are coming to understand that logic and reason lead us to God, not away from Him.

60 posted on 04/26/2012 9:00:39 PM PDT by Can i say that here?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson