Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Makes the Wrong Call on Oil Speculation (Speculator are NOT to blame for rising oil prices)
Fiscal Times ^ | 04/27/2012 | By BRUCE BARTLETT

Posted on 04/27/2012 4:55:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: SeekAndFind

So... What happens if all of the speculators decide to move their business off shore?


21 posted on 04/27/2012 7:16:08 AM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
The thing the article fails to mention is buying massive amounts with little to nothing in cash to cover the futures purchase. That drives up prices on the futures, which are then sold at inflated prices. That is what is happening today. Even Eric Bollings, who worked in that business, said that. Require real assets to cover the trades and that problem instantly goes away.

Your understanding of the futures market seems very thin. Futures trades actually smooth out the irregularities that would develop in any commodity due to seasonal, political, weather, transportation anomalies etc. When you take on a futures contract you own the product. You may make a profit or you could take a big big loss depending on the fluctuations. Since most commodity contracts are held for minutes, maybe a couple of hours, they are traded actively and the prices stay in a very close range. Go spend a day at the Chicago Board of Trade or the Merc or any of the active commodities exchanges and learn how the system works. You'll be glad you did.

Former trader

22 posted on 04/27/2012 7:31:28 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Perhaps you should talk to Eric Bollings about it.

If you know more about it than he does you could get your own TV show.


23 posted on 04/27/2012 8:50:02 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
... after Bush signed the executive order to expand offshore drilling and the price collapsed so quickly...

I agree.

.

.

.


24 posted on 04/27/2012 8:58:20 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; thackney
“I’m glad you mentioned natural gas. If we are to run around blaming speculators for the high price of oil, we have to blame them for the record low price of natural gas.”

There is no way to compare oil to NG.

NG has sales value limited by pipelines or underground storage space, which is limited.

Oil can be transported by truck from the wellheads, to tanker ships and sold anywhere in the world.

25 posted on 04/27/2012 9:14:55 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
NG has sales value limited by pipelines or underground storage space, which is limited.

Oil can be transported by truck from the wellheads, to tanker ships and sold anywhere in the world.

The difference between the two equates to supply and demand. You cannot successfully speculate an increase in price if there is an abundance of supply relative to demand.

Speculation is not the source of high prices. Limited supply relative to demand is the source. Speculation is only one of the pricing steps given the supply and demand conditions.

The only lasting way to lower price is to increase supply relative to demand (or decrease demand relative to supply or both). Far more oil is traded in markets outside the US. To make the NYMEX more restrictive only pushes more traders to operate in foreign markets. To think that we will be priced separate of those is naive, especially considering that most of the crude oil we use is imported.

Also natural gas is shipped by tanker, even LNG is shipped by truck in some locations. It is only a matter of price; the transport costs are greater than compared to oil, but not prohibitive in many markets.

26 posted on 04/27/2012 10:14:12 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
speculation has a huge effect on the market and people who do not actually consume the oil control a majority of the market.

Control a majority of the market? Not unless they take delivery and sit on it, otherwise how would they control any of it?

27 posted on 04/27/2012 4:30:26 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Control a majority of the market? Not unless they take delivery and sit on it, otherwise how would they control any of it?

Wall Street financial companies Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup and others all had sizable oil storage operations in 2008. They didn't even have to move the oil, they just traded futures contracts off it and let 'contango' do the rest.

28 posted on 04/27/2012 5:45:34 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

How sizable?
How does ‘contango’ let them control the market?


29 posted on 04/27/2012 6:45:46 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
When a financial institution goes out and buys an oil storage facility or rents a fleet of oil tankers for the express purpose of holding oil out of the market while 'betting' that the price will increase, they are speculating pure and simple.

It's been estimated that close to 10% of the available oil was being held off the market this way in 2007-2008, certainly enough to drive prices higher and ensure these players won their 'bets'.

30 posted on 04/27/2012 7:08:30 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Oil futures contracts are for future delivery. This isn’t like they are just gambling on Intrade - they are buying contracts for oil delivery. The fact that they don’t take delivery doesn’t mean they don’t control the market. As much as 80% of the contracts for future oil delivery are held by speculators. Sure, they can default and not take delivery - after all, the margin requirements are so low that they risk little by doing so. However, speculation has an enormous impact - even the CEO of Exxon has said that as much as 40% of the price of oil is due to speculation. That might be current, but if past history is any indication it can be much higher than that.


31 posted on 04/27/2012 8:37:10 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
It's been estimated that close to 10% of the available oil was being held off the market this way in 2007-2008

10% would be about 8 million barrels a day. Nearly 3 billion barrels a year.

Where did you find that estimate?

32 posted on 04/27/2012 9:23:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
The fact that they don’t take delivery doesn’t mean they don’t control the market.

If you don't touch the oil, don't store the oil, don't consume the oil, how do they control anything?

As much as 80% of the contracts for future oil delivery are held by speculators.

So what?

Sure, they can default and not take delivery -

Default? What does that mean in reference to an oil futures contract?

after all, the margin requirements are so low that they risk little by doing so.

Yeah, they could lose their margin deposit. How little do you think that would be?

even the CEO of Exxon has said that as much as 40% of the price of oil is due to speculation.

And why wouldn't he say that? Anything that gets the idiots attacking Exxon to attack someone else is a good thing. It's easier than actually educating the idiots.

33 posted on 04/27/2012 9:28:36 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
First..the question of whether speculation plays a role in the rising price of oil has been answered in the affirmative, and that Wall St. financial houses are major players in the speculation.

I'd like to see you acknowledge that before delving into the question of 'how big' a bunch of greedy whores they are.

34 posted on 04/28/2012 5:01:19 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

They hold a contract for delivery. If the oil producers don’t have it reserved for them, then it isn’t a contract. This is in no way a difficult concept to understand. They purchase a contract for future delivery with the sole intent of reselling it, though several large banks HAVE taken delivery - this time with the sole intention of stockpiling it to prevent losses.


35 posted on 04/28/2012 5:35:23 AM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Didn’t I read that Zer0 started tapping the SOR this week or last?

We can be assured that gas prices will stay below the $4/gal. mark until after the election.
That seems to be the price that perks the naysayers.


36 posted on 04/28/2012 6:43:23 AM PDT by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
First..the question of whether speculation plays a role in the rising price of oil has been answered in the affirmative

When the market thinks something is going to increase future usage or decrease future supply, the futures market turns that into rising prices.

When the market thinks something is going to decrease future usage or increase future supply, the futures market turns that into falling prices.

And it has nothing to do with greedy whores.

37 posted on 04/28/2012 6:54:47 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
They hold a contract for delivery.

Who? The nasty speculators? What about the speculators who are short a contract?

If the oil producers don’t have it reserved for them, then it isn’t a contract.

You don't think all contracts are sold by oil producers, do you?

They purchase a contract for future delivery with the sole intent of reselling it,

When they buy the contract, it makes prices rise? When they resell it, don't prices go down?

38 posted on 04/28/2012 6:59:33 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sport

Food aid, if their lucky. US communities will cheer the arrival of UN food trucks. /sarc off


39 posted on 04/28/2012 7:11:17 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The leftist aka progressive blame high gas prices on every thing but them. No new refineries. Epa laws mandating more then 20 different blends of gas for the nation.


40 posted on 04/28/2012 7:18:42 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson