Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EGPWS
After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this?

All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

12 posted on 04/29/2012 7:35:36 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Last Dakotan

Name one conservative Mitt Romney named to the courts in Massachusetts.


14 posted on 04/29/2012 7:41:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can’t be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
Yes, we need to idolize a known socialist liberal hack liar, back him as a "conservative" party saviour, toss all conviction out the window to save us from a known socialist liberal hack liar from a "liberal party" for the good of the country.

It's worked so far....

Welcome to 4 more years of 0bama.

16 posted on 04/29/2012 7:46:42 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

I have to agree Dakota..., it is what comes to mind every time says they are staying home come November because Obama is what we deserve over the centrist Romney..... that will become a regret as our children and grandchild for generations get ruled on by Obama lasting court appointees.


20 posted on 04/29/2012 8:11:48 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

“All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.”

And you Rino loving bullies need to can the insults and work on persuading people. You act as arrogant as the libs.


25 posted on 04/29/2012 8:32:45 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

I can't be fear-mongered into giving up my faith, self-evident truth, or the principles upon which American liberty depends.

27 posted on 04/29/2012 8:40:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (You can be a Romney Republican or you can be a conservative. You can’t be both. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

Stop pissing down my back and telling me is raining. Romney has no history of nominating conservatives to the bench. Quite the opposite. A David Souter type is the best we can hope for from Romney.

In other words, we have lost the Supreme Court -- probably for good.
32 posted on 04/29/2012 8:46:15 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

That should make anyone with doubts about defeating Obama sh&t their pants.
50 posted on 04/29/2012 9:07:42 AM PDT by Oceander (TINSTAAFL - Mother Nature Abhors a Free Lunch almost as much as She Abhors a Vacuum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

>All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

Well, obviously fun for everyone.
And by ‘fun’ I don’t mean CWII, because the Kelo decision should have done *that*; it was, after all, a decision saying that the government can justify taking your property with nothing more than imagining (projecting) that it would generate some sort of taxable income.


70 posted on 04/30/2012 8:44:09 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

He'd do less damage to the Constitution than would another Souter.

There may well come a time when there are five lawless judges on the Court. When that time comes, the only hope for the Republic will be for a significant portion of the populace to realize that although what the Constitution says, and what the Supreme Court says, will be one and the same when the court is doing its duty, there is nothing in the Supreme Law of the Land which gives the Supreme Court any authority to issue decisions contrary to it, much less anything which says such decisions should be regarded as superior to the Constitution.

The more overtly political the Court's leftist judges are, the more accepting people will be of the notion that an overt willingness on the part of some of the justices to ignore the Constitution does not change the Supreme Law of the Land. If in some case five judges openly ignore the Constitution, there may not be any remedy for the actual parties to that case, but nor is there any basis for declaring that the Constitution means the things claimed by judges who are overtly disregarding it.

76 posted on 05/02/2012 4:55:05 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

Nice try, but the Republicans Congress would NEVER let that happen. Unlike the Czars, the SCOTUS nominees must undergo a vetting process in the Senate.

Everyone (including myself) who has decided not to vote for Mitt will still vote down-ticket-Republican. Obama WILL be a lame-duck president!

Personally I see it as safer than a Republican Congress that votes in favor of Romney bills for the sake of party unity. (see TARP, No Child, etc...)

Once again... FEAR MONGERING seems the only way you establishment people operate.
78 posted on 05/03/2012 12:40:05 PM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean

Well said!

81 posted on 05/03/2012 1:02:51 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001. NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson