What is the deal?
Is Newt OFF the ballot entirely, or what? Lots of states have had no primary yet. 1144 is not actually here.
We will vote for dog catcher before we cast one for Rommell.
Someone needs to STAY on the ballot, or the GOP-E needs to guarantee a convention brawl, which they will NEVER DO, since they have succeeded with their cram down candidate among the useful idiots among us.
As for Palin, who was scared to run, Perry, Herb Cain, Bachmann, Santorum, and now NEWT, they all have said from the get-go that they intend “to back the nominee”.
What an old tag line for cover. THAT is not what REBELLION is made of. That’s politics as usual by those who have been gamed and are now IN the game for their own fruitful future here in the Land of OZ.
Where were they when the last conservative was standing?
Crickets, but for their mime of “ABO”. They were not willing to put their skin in the game to the end either.
Fire in the belly melted into tepid squish and became “go along to get along”. After all, they’re set. They will now be picked off by the Rommell campaign to cooperate with the socialist. Clear as a bell, that’s coming.
So you're saying “rebellion” is made of: 1) not voting, 2) voting third party, or 3) doing a write in?
I don't see these options as rebellion, I see them as wasting a vote and helping a Marxist win a second term.
As Rush says: “I live in Realville.”