Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Romney
American Clarion ^ | January 18, 2012 | Bob Ellis

Posted on 04/29/2012 4:25:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

The Daily Caller reports a huge 200-page research document has hit the internet, and it reveals Mitt Romney utterly and damningly for the flip-flopping opportunistic liberal that he is.

The paper was compiled during the 2008 presidential race and is believed to be from the McCain campaign (not the most conservative source itself). Among some of the interesting tidbits that blow a hole in his claims about being pro-life, pro-marriage, and generally conservative:

Abortion

• Romney says he changed his mind on abortion meeting with Harvard stem cell researcher - Romney claims the doctor said scientists "kill" embryos after 14 days, but doctor later said Romney "mischaracterized my position."
• Months after his "conversion," Romney stated his commitment to upholding Massachusetts’ abortion laws and appointed pro-choice judge to state district court.
• In October 2005, Romney signed bill expanding family planning services, including abortion counseling and morning-after pill.
• In December 2005, Romney "abruptly ordered his administration to reverse course . . . and require Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception medication to rape victims."
• Romney health insurance plan expanded access to abortion, required Planned Parenthood representative on state panel.
• Romney endorsed legalization of abortion pill RU-486 access during his 1994 Senate race and backed federal funding of abortion, saying "I think it’s important that people see me not as a pro-life candidate."
• In 1994 and 2002, Romney confirmed his support for Roe v. Wade decision and forcefully positioned himself as pro-choice in 1994 Senate race, saying "you will not see me wavering on that."
• Romney has refused to comment on bill pending in South Carolina legislature requiring that abortion doctors offer pregnant women option of viewing ultrasound.

Gay Rights

• Romney endorsed Rep. Barney Frank’s Employment Nondiscrimination Act in 1994.
• In 1994, Romney called "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy first step toward having gays and lesbians "able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military" and said he would provide "more effective leadership" on gay rights issues than Ted Kennedy.
• In 2003, Washington Times reported Romney "would support a Vermont-style civil union law in Massachusetts."
• As governor, Romney said health coverage benefits and hospital visitation rights should be provided to gay couples.
• Romney promised to make gay partnership benefits a "hallmark of my leadership as governor" and has said he would attend gay weddings if invited.
• Romney publicly opposed Boy Scouts’ ban on homosexuals in 1994 and 2002 campaigns.
• In 2002, Romney backed hate crimes legislation that included sexual orientation provisions.
• In 2007, Romney praised gay parent who confronted him over gay marriage issue, but in 2005 remarked to South Carolina audience that some gay couples "are actually having children" and called it "wrong."

Gun Control

• In 1994 Senate race, Romney backed Brady bill and assault weapons ban, saying "I don’t line up with the NRA" and "that’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA."
• Romney called Clinton crime bill "a big step forward."
• As governor, Romney quadrupled gun licensing fees and vowed not to "chip away" at tough gun laws
• In 2004, Romney signed permanent state-level ban on assault weapons that was mirrored after federal assault weapons ban. • In January 2006, Romney said he owned a gun - then two days later admitted he did not and the gun belonged to his son.
• Romney bragged about being member of the NRA but later revealed he didn’t join until August 2006, just before launching his presidential campaign.
• Romney recently said he’s "been a hunter pretty much all my life" but later admitted he hunted only twice in his life, later clarifying remarks by claiming he has hunted "small varmints . . . more than two times."
• In 2006 press conference, Romney claimed he had been hunting "many times" after returning from quail hunt in Georgia.

The paper also goes on to provide much greater details about these facts also. You should be sure to read the whole thing.

If Republicans allow themselves to be duped into believing Mitt "RomneyCare" Romney is a real Republican (much less a real conservative), they will be sorely disappointed if given a chance to find the truth once he’s in the White House.

If Republicans allow the "mainstream" media and RINO elites to scare them into settling for this poor excuse for a Republican, they are going to kick themselves later. With Americans having gotten a clear look at liberalism under Barack Obama and his Democrat Congress, there will never be a better time to elect a real Republican, a conservative who understands how America was designed to operate. With the damage done by liberals to our great nation, there has never been a time when we have more desperately needed a conservative who knows what makes this country tick . . . not one who will only reduce - but not stop - the level of liberal poison being injected into our society.

The truth is, Romney almost certainly will not get a chance to show his true face. Enough Republicans already understand that he’s nothing but a liberal with an "R" after his name, which means that even if people allow the "mainstream" media and the GOP establishment to fool them into supporting him in the primary, there will not be enough support from Republicans who know the truth to push him over the top in the general election. Principled Republicans will not vote for a fraud like Romney, and when "independents" are given a choice between a liberal with an "R" after his name and a liberal who proudly embraces the liberal Democrat Party, they’ll go for the genuine article every time.

Republicans, let’s throw this pretender onto the side of the road while there is still time, and choose a real Republican like Rick Santorum. Half-measures and "the lesser of two evils" will not be enough to save our ailing country; we must have decisive leadership that understands the need to return to the traditional American values that are PROVEN to work. Rick Santorum understands that; Mitt Romney just doesn’t get it.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 351-353 next last
To: SoConPubbie

But NEVER any anti-o bama or anti-Dem. Interesting.


151 posted on 05/01/2012 10:25:57 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Spend your time tearing down o bama. That doesn’t mean you are building Romney up. You WANT o bama to win, NOT A DOUBT IN MY MIND. You wanted him in 2008 when you ripped McCain apart too. You disgust me, but you disgust MOST freepers so what else is new?

You can keep lying about my motives and wanting to vote for Obama and I couldn't care less if I disgust you.

The record of Romney will be continued to be posted by me until November unless Jim or the Moderators ask me to stop.
152 posted on 05/01/2012 10:27:37 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Bash this bastard for a while. He REALLY deserves it! PhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucketPhotobucket
153 posted on 05/01/2012 10:30:28 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
But NEVER any anti-o bama or anti-Dem. Interesting.

Why would I focus on something that is already done quite effectively on FreeRepublic by many, many posters?

Why not focus on something that might actually change the GOP for the better and that few have really chosen to do?

Like exposing the GOP-E and their hand-picked candidates like that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney?

My first concern is that the GOP return to Reagan style conservatism. Romney is the anti-thesis, as McCain before him of conservatism.
154 posted on 05/01/2012 10:30:36 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; mojitojoe
We could start by not calling one another names. I wish that would happen but I'm not hopeful.

It doesn't look good when a poster only attacks the liberal RNC and not the communist DNC. It makes others suspicious. I am NOT accusing you of anything. I'm only telling you how we got here.

155 posted on 05/01/2012 10:34:21 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Jim Robinson; onyx
I just found this...

The Obama campaign has used Mitt Romney’s 2010 tax returns to create a map of the presumptive Republican nominee’s overseas bank accounts.

See the "Value not disclosed in return" in the notations.

Why the hell does Romney need to shelter all this money overseas? What is he hiding?? The Obama campaign will be making hay of this for months.

Link

romney overseas havens

156 posted on 05/01/2012 10:41:14 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (The epitome of stupidity is a member of a proven racist sect running against a black man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

It doesn’t look good when a poster only attacks the liberal RNC and not the communist DNC. It makes others suspicious. I am NOT accusing you of anything. I’m only telling you how we got here.
_________________________________
EXACTLY!


157 posted on 05/01/2012 10:41:30 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; mojitojoe
It doesn't look good when a poster only attacks the liberal RNC and not the communist DNC. It makes others suspicious. I am NOT accusing you of anything. I'm only telling you how we got here.

Well, like I just explained to MojitoJoe, that job is already being done very effectively and very often by many, many posters.

There are very few posters that have taken up the task of keeping the heat on GOP and conservative Pretenders whose only purpose is to move the GOP to the left and destroy any influence the Tea-Party has in the GOP.

And BTW, it is not fun, especially for my effort I get accused on a continual basis of being either a troll, a member of DU, a Mole or any other inaccurate, untrue and dishonest names.
158 posted on 05/01/2012 10:42:43 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

In 2008, there was o bama and McCain. You bashed McCain up until the election, even after Sarah was with him. Now it’s 2012 and you’re doing a repeat. You WANT o bama, not a doubt my mind. Look at your posts. Look how many freepers call you a troll, an Obot, etc. There must be a reason.


159 posted on 05/01/2012 10:45:08 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; mojitojoe

I know. We’re all watching it slip away and no one knows how to stop it or fight back so we “eat” one another.


160 posted on 05/01/2012 10:46:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
this has to be from the DNC - they must be scared

Have fun defending this leftist phony from the truth. You won't get any help from me.
161 posted on 05/01/2012 10:51:57 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

“In 2008, there was o bama and McCain. You bashed McCain up until the election, even after Sarah was with him.”

To be fair, a lot of conservatives were and are disgusted by McCain.

Find evidence of his bashing Sarah and you have a case...


162 posted on 05/01/2012 10:53:58 AM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

To be fair, a lot of conservatives were and are disgusted by McCain.
_______________________
So was I, but I never tore him down when he was the candidate running against the Muslim Marxist.


163 posted on 05/01/2012 10:55:50 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Give it up dude.

Not a chance. SoConPubbie is providing a valuable service. He is preventing those who wish to delude themselves about Romney from doing so.

The truth matters and here's the truth: Though your screen name is "no dems", you will in fact be voting for a guy who lines up with them ideologically in November. Ironic, isn't it?
164 posted on 05/01/2012 10:56:22 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
So was I, but I never tore him down when he was the candidate running against the Muslim Marxist.

I was right there with you on McCain. He was a bad candidate but at least he was reliably pro-life and pro-2A. Romney is neither of those two things.

As another poster wrote, Romney is a RINO too far. Obama or Nobama, I won't vote for him. I don't vote based on fear.
165 posted on 05/01/2012 10:59:59 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Good catch gf.

It’s just a matter of time before the media uses this, along with his lousy record, to try and destroy his campaign.


166 posted on 05/01/2012 11:04:28 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Commentary: McCain not getting credit from Latinos
Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:11:54 PM · 7 of 19
SoConPubbie to norton
Meanwhile, during a recent interview on Spanish-language television, Gov. Sarah Palin declared her support for comprehensive immigration reform. She said that, while she doesn’t favor a “total amnesty” (without conditions), she does support giving illegal immigrants a path to earned legalization.

Sarah’s stock just went down several notches in my eyes.

She is now officially tarnished.


167 posted on 05/01/2012 11:05:45 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
In 2008, there was o bama and McCain. You bashed McCain up until the election, even after Sarah was with him. Now it’s 2012 and you’re doing a repeat. You WANT o bama, not a doubt my mind. Look at your posts. Look how many freepers call you a troll, an Obot, etc. There must be a reason.

Yes, I continued to post the truth about McCain, but the frequency of my postings were much dimished.

I voted for Sarah, which by extension means I voted for McCain.

Why would I turn into a hypocrite and stop posting the truth about McCain? It was still his record.
168 posted on 05/01/2012 11:07:18 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
You WANT o bama, not a doubt my mind. Look at your posts. Look how many freepers call you a troll, an Obot, etc. There must be a reason.

Yes, there is a reason, they are supporters of Mitt Romney, a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal and they don't like the truth about Mitt Romney, his record, that verifies that he is a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal being posted.

Why should I care about mischaracterizations and some out-right lying about me?
169 posted on 05/01/2012 11:15:17 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; AnTiw1


Do you agree with everything that Mitt Romney has done?

Have you ever posted anything negative about him?

If so, you must be a hypocrite by your line of reasoning.

What you forgot to mention MojitoJoe, were the thousands of post after that post that were defending Sarah and supportive of Sarah, because like most rational people, I'll never find the perfect candidate, but that does not mean that I am not free to criticize my own candidate, in fact, that actually means I am an honest person.
170 posted on 05/01/2012 11:18:49 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; AnTiw1
Sarah’s stock just went down several notches in my eyes.

She is now officially tarnished.


Do you agree with everything that Mitt Romney has done?

Have you ever posted anything negative about him?

If so, you must be a hypocrite by your line of reasoning.

What you forgot to mention MojitoJoe, were the thousands of post after that post that were defending Sarah and supportive of Sarah, because like most rational people, I'll never find the perfect candidate, but that does not mean that I am not free to criticize my own candidate, in fact, that actually means I am an honest person.
171 posted on 05/01/2012 11:19:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
are you for another four years of Obama?

I have never been a Romney supporter (I favored Perry even though he didn't debate well) - by word, background and experience he was the only REAL conservative among the candidates, IMO.

But I am pro-American and will support whoever ends up on the ballot to oppose Obama.

All this anti-Romney rhetoric can only play into the DNC hands. I know you don't agree - but, think about it.

172 posted on 05/01/2012 11:20:49 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The exact same “report” could have been put out against Reagan. or anyone who has been in the public eye for more than a weekend. He’s the nominee. Get over it.


173 posted on 05/01/2012 11:24:00 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
The exact same “report” could have been put out against Reagan. or anyone who has been in the public eye for more than a weekend. He’s the nominee. Get over it.

He's your nominee, not mine, and I will not get over it.

He's your nominee so you should be OK with his record, right?

Why get upset over his record being posted?
174 posted on 05/01/2012 11:27:01 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Thats the biggest problem. I really like debating over a wide variety of issues. But there is no debating, just bullet points and vague proclamations or gotchas.


175 posted on 05/01/2012 11:29:59 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The report could have been made “exposing” Newt, Perry, Herman Cain or anyone. All ya need is dedication to distortion and misinformation. Its SOP for all you pro-Obama trolls.


176 posted on 05/01/2012 11:32:50 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You shouldnt, I dont. Just because I think its silly to say we are in the revolution doesnt mean I dont think its equally silly to pretend like the world is going to end.


177 posted on 05/01/2012 11:32:50 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Doesn’t sound good to me either...unless afterwards she added that “path” led either to a recruiters’ office or the back of the line, their choice. Maybe we need to look at ways to improve immigration policy or facilitate guest worker programs...but we do what’s constitutional and in America’s interests...because the guilt trip well is bone dry.

Immigrants are what we’re all about, but cheating to get ahead is a crime, period. Sometimes I think it’s an honor deficit that is the real root of our country’s woes.

Men of the caliber of Thomas Jefferson and Andy Jackson would not now be wringing their hands over how to find a strong man in Washington to save them...they would drag liberals out of their offices by the ears. Especially Andy. I have no doubt Andy Jackson would throw a loop around Pelosi and drag her behind a horse to the hoosegow.

“President Jackson! How can you treat a woman that way?”

“That was a woman??! Tarnation if it didn’t look like a crazy coyote with a bad case of mange...” ;^)


178 posted on 05/01/2012 11:36:08 AM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
You shouldnt, I dont. Just because I think its silly to say we are in the revolution doesnt mean I dont think its equally silly to pretend like the world is going to end.

Well, I can respect that.
179 posted on 05/01/2012 11:37:27 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So you are saying you are not a troll? Because you post like one. Where are your anti-Obama threads? Or Pelosi or Reid? Why did you double down on Romney after everyone dropped out. You are trying to suppress Republican votes in order for your guy (Obama) to win. You know that if people dont go to vote for President, there is an extremely thin chance they will go to vote for down ballot candidates.

We all know who Mitt is. You keep posting the same old thread over and over hoping for a pat on the back or something.

But whats worse is, you name yourself SoConPubbie, in hopes to destroy the image of social conservatives by acting like an out of control, conspiracy raving lunatic. Your trolling has been noticed.


180 posted on 05/01/2012 11:38:42 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Deb
The report could have been made “exposing” Newt, Perry, Herman Cain or anyone. All ya need is dedication to distortion and misinformation. Its SOP for all you pro-Obama trolls.

Well, much like your lying accusation concerning me, you have no proof to prove your assertion that it is a distortion of his record.

All it is is another example of the excuses made by Romney supporters to cover-up how bad he really is.
181 posted on 05/01/2012 11:39:17 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
So you are saying you are not a troll? Because you post like one. Where are your anti-Obama threads? Or Pelosi or Reid? Why did you double down on Romney after everyone dropped out. You are trying to suppress Republican votes in order for your guy (Obama) to win. You know that if people dont go to vote for President, there is an extremely thin chance they will go to vote for down ballot candidates.

Why would I waste my precious time on something that is already being done very effectively and very consistantly by other Freepers?

When I could be using my time doing something that not many others are doing, posting articles that truly expose what a rotten, lousy Republican poser and conservative poser Mitt ROmney really is?
182 posted on 05/01/2012 11:41:51 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Why did you double down on Romney after everyone dropped out.

That's not true just by looking at my article posting history.

Perry (I believe), Newt, and Rick were all still in the race when I started posting regularly articles exposing Mitt Romney's real record.
183 posted on 05/01/2012 11:43:29 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
You are trying to suppress Republican votes in order for your guy (Obama) to win.

Another lie by a supporter of a liar.
184 posted on 05/01/2012 11:44:45 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
hahahahahaha!!! Hey Virgil's doin' GREAT!!! Your campaign is totally working and you're making a real difference. Really. I'm not kidding. A HUGE difference. Vigil's a shoe-in. And we've never had a president named Virgil...I'm looking forward to the t-shirts!!

Well done, leftist hack.

185 posted on 05/01/2012 11:46:22 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
You keep posting the same old thread over and over hoping for a pat on the back or something.

No, I keep re-posting about 75 articles to expose the Real record of Mitt Romney's lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record.

Another distortion of my posting history by a MittWitt.
186 posted on 05/01/2012 11:46:40 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

What’s ill-informed about it? Heavy on insults, light on facts is not a good debate technique.


187 posted on 05/01/2012 11:48:04 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
But whats worse is, you name yourself SoConPubbie, in hopes to destroy the image of social conservatives by acting like an out of control, conspiracy raving lunatic.

No, what's worse are conservatives, compromising all of their values, to support a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney.



And what would you call continually posting in favor of or promoting a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney on a conservative site when the owner of the site has repeatedly stated that FreeRepublic won't be used to campaign for Mitt Romney?
188 posted on 05/01/2012 11:49:11 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
But whats worse is, you name yourself SoConPubbie, in hopes to destroy the image of social conservatives by acting like an out of control, conspiracy raving lunatic.

No, what's worse are conservatives, compromising all of their values, to support a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney.

Your trolling has been noticed.

And what would you call continually posting in favor of or promoting a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney on a conservative site when the owner of the site has repeatedly stated that FreeRepublic won't be used to campaign for Mitt Romney?
189 posted on 05/01/2012 11:49:25 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Well done, leftist hack.

Well that's rich coming from a supporter of that lying, left-wing, Progessive Liberal Mitt Romney.
190 posted on 05/01/2012 11:50:54 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Yes, those real conservatives you called RINO’s before supporting them, like Newt.


191 posted on 05/01/2012 11:56:16 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Probably tax purposes, potentially charity purposes. Why does it matter?


192 posted on 05/01/2012 11:59:13 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
Yes, those real conservatives you called RINO’s before supporting them, like Newt.

Yes I did, until there was no-one left but Romney, a hard-left, lying, Progressive Liberal and Newt, who actually has a conservative record.

I stopped at that point and looked at what my available choices were and re-examined Newt's record, including his website which addressed many of the distortions of his record, and which also had his statements declaring how wrong he had been on several issues.

And after is was all said and done, the choice was clear, as it would be to any sincere conservative.

But I was already on record for being ready and able to vote for both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich two conservatives for whom I had disagreements with, but were not out and out lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberals like Mitt Romney.

SO, I have to ask, have you never posted anything negative about Romney?

If so, why are you supporting him now?
193 posted on 05/01/2012 12:00:55 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Evil is not a toy.... By willingly joining the Romney ranks, you won’t change it... It will change you... And you will aid it’s rise and eventual fall... Forcing ‘socialists’ like Obama and Romney on the people of America is an evil act baited and played on the voters....


194 posted on 05/01/2012 12:05:25 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Why would you waste your time telling people on FR that Mitt isnt a conservative when they already know that? Unless suppressing the vote is your goal.


195 posted on 05/01/2012 12:05:33 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

And after they dropped out, you began posting like 8 articles a day, reposting the same thing over and over.


196 posted on 05/01/2012 12:06:54 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

This is a conservative site....not a republican site...there is a difference. Romney is not a conservative....he’s a liar and deceptive individual not worthy of the Presidency any more than Obama is. Conservatives don’t vote for socialists.


197 posted on 05/01/2012 12:08:06 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
And after they dropped out, you began posting like 8 articles a day, reposting the same thing over and over.

Another distortion, I was doing that all along since I started. Some days more, some days less, some days not all.

Nothing has changed. It's all based on my schedule which can be erratic.

Why do you mittwits lie so much?
198 posted on 05/01/2012 12:09:37 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

You just admitted to doing what I said, then said I was distorting. We all know you keep posting the same things over and over, and that is where a lot of the problem comes from. What is your end goal? Why do you need to keep posting it?


199 posted on 05/01/2012 12:10:32 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

You have fallen into a nest of (supposedly) Constitution Party loons. They trash Mormonism all day in the “Religion” forum and post any crazy “article” they can find against Romney in the main forum. But their main objective is to re-elect Obama.


200 posted on 05/01/2012 12:13:09 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 351-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson