Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election 2012 Trial Heat: Obama vs. Romney (Romney now leading by one in tracking poll)
Gallup ^ | 05/01/2012

Posted on 05/01/2012 6:43:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Among registered voters

Obama Romney
04/24-29/2012 46% 47%
04/23-28/2012 47% 46%
04/22-27/2012 48% 45%
04/21-26/2012 50% 43%
04/20-24/2012 49% 43%
04/19-23/2012 49% 42%
04/18-22/2012 47% 44%
04/17-21/2012 47% 44%
04/16-20/2012 45% 46%
04/15-19/2012 44% 47%

These are the results when registered voters are asked: "Suppose the presidential election were held today. If Barack Obama were the Democratic Party's candidate and Mitt Romney were the Republican Party's candidate, who would you vote for Barack Obama, the Democrat or Mitt Romney, the Republican?" Those who are undecided are further asked if they lean more toward Obama or Romney and their leanings are incorporated into the results. Each five-day rolling average is based on telephone interviews with approximately 2,200 registered voters; Margin of error is ±3 percentage points.

Click below to get more stories, RSS feeds, and e-mail alerts on these topics:

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gallup; obama; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: dirtboy

The debates are basically going to be Obama saying ad nauseum, “You did the same thing, Mitt.”


21 posted on 05/01/2012 7:39:12 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The campaign is going to be one long dreary slog to the bottonm- with the least unpopular candidate after the mudfest emerging as the winner.


22 posted on 05/01/2012 7:47:36 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: deport

National polling isn’t as important as state polling because we elect on a state bases”

You are absolutely correct.

That said...I think at somepoint, if for example, Romney were to be 3 points on top naitonally for an extended period, it seems that those national polls sort of “pull” the state polls in that driection over time. It is interesting to watch every 4 years, and I doubt this year will be any different....

The national polls are irrelevant....except indirectly and it seems in that way they gain relevance as fall approaches


23 posted on 05/01/2012 7:49:07 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I believe we are witnessing a turn in the trend which ultimately will prove that Romney is not limited to 190 delegates because we are likely to see not only the return of Ohio to the Republican fold but Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as well. The states could easily be coupled with the Southwest, New Hampshire to produce a substantial victory.

As the trend manifests itself it will gather momentum and at some place along that trend line Obama will make a decision about whether to contrive an October Surprise. I have been warning since February or early March that we should not fear the Ides of March But Beware the Surprises of October (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2854282/posts).

As the numbers trend against Obama it becomes increasingly likely that we will see a strike on Iran.


24 posted on 05/01/2012 7:56:15 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Romney actually runs AGAINST Obama’s policies, spending, ‘forward’ scheme and the inevitable cliff it imposes, he might win.

If Romney runs on ‘Obama is a nice guy’, Romney loses just like McCain did.

Romney needs to step up and show a definitive and distinct difference between him and his direction for the Nation as opposed to Obama’s.

Otherwise, Obama will eek out a 2nd term.


25 posted on 05/01/2012 8:00:46 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
The debates are basically going to be Obama saying ad nauseum, “You did the same thing, Mitt.”

That depends. If SCOTUS strikes down Obamacare, Romney will have a huge card up his sleeve in that he'll always be able to answer, "at least what I did was constitutional" whenever the subject gets brought up.

If SCOTUS doesn't strike down Obamacare, yes, this charge becomes more difficult to defend against.

26 posted on 05/01/2012 8:01:45 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Being ahead doesn’t matter if there is no path to 270 (see Al Gore)...he has got to win FLA, NC, OHIO, VA


27 posted on 05/01/2012 8:04:38 AM PDT by rman04554
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Unfortunately, Romney cannot win because conservatives will not vote for him.

Bull. A handful of Freepers may stay home or vote for Virgil Goode but all polling currently indicates that Romney is slowly winning over conservative voters, many of whom supported him (albeit begrudgingly) in their state primaries. They'll show up to vote for him.

28 posted on 05/01/2012 8:10:11 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
Bad news for the the 100's of FReepers who are pumping for an 0bama victory?

I believe the correct term would be "deeply saddened."

29 posted on 05/01/2012 8:12:02 AM PDT by tnlibertarian (I <3 PEJSWDTDSOPC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
Bad news for the the 100’s of FReepers who are pumping for an Øbama victory?

Hundreds? A couple dozen tops. They just show up on every thread and post the same talking points.

The overwhelming majority of Freepers are ABO. It's just they've been badgered into silence.

30 posted on 05/01/2012 8:13:37 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A poll of LIKELY voters is more accurate than a poll of registered voters.


31 posted on 05/01/2012 8:13:55 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is a spin poll, notice its “registered voters’ not “likely voters”. The spin doctors want to show nobama just barely behind to juice up sympathy. If they showed the butthead was 15% down, then his friends would be so down they would not bother to vote.

Propaganda does not sleep, thrust damn little you read or hear from those with a purpose.


32 posted on 05/01/2012 9:07:32 AM PDT by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Registered voters polling is worthless.


33 posted on 05/01/2012 2:30:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson