Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Warren camp: Its sexist for Scott Brown to ask if shes lying about being Native American
Hotair ^ | 05/01/2012 | Allahpundit

Posted on 05/01/2012 6:50:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

If the presidential election can come down to whether it's more offensive to eat dogs or put one in a kennel on top of your car, I guess it's fair for a Senate election to come down to whether Elizabeth Warren is 1/10,000th Cherokee.

The newest front in the "war on women," apparently: Calling a female pol out on her self-serving B.S.

Despite claiming she never used her Native American heritage when applying for a job, Elizabeth Warren’s campaign admitted last night the Democrat listed her minority status in professional directories for years when she taught at the University of Texas and the University of Pennsylvania...

The Herald reported Friday that embattled Harvard Law School officials touted Warren’s Native American heritage — she reportedly has ancestors from the Cherokee and Delaware tribes — as proof of the faculty’s diversity…

Mindy Myers, Warren’s campaign manager, had this to say today:

“If Scott Brown has questions about Elizabeth Warren’s well-known qualifications — from her high marks as a teacher to her nationally recognized work on bankruptcy and the pressures on middle class families – he ought to ask them directly instead of hiding behind the nasty insinuations of his campaign and trying to score political points. Once again, the qualifications and ability of a woman are being called into question by Scott Brown who did the same thing with the Supreme Court nomination of Elena Kagan. It’s outrageous.”

It’s not so much a story about Warren’s heritage, in other words, as whether she lied about it in order to boost her appeal to Harvard as a solution to their diversity problem. According to her campaign, Charles Fried helped recruit her to the school and swears that her ancestry played no part, by which I assume he means that Warren didn’t bring it up in interviews, etc. Fair enough, but as the Herald notes, she was listed as a minority professor in the Association of American Law Schools’ annual directory from 1986 to 1995. She joined Harvard Law as a visiting professor in 1992 and became a full-time prof there in 1995, which means she was still being listed as a minority for a few years while she was there. Did whoever hired her know about that? Via Ace, David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy finds another curiosity:

The old AALS Directory of Faculty guides are online (through academic libraries) at Hein Online. The directories starting listing minority faculty in an appendix in 1986. There’s Elizabeth Warren, listed as a professor at Texas. I spot-checked three additional directories from when she was a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, including 1995-96, the year Harvard offered her a position. Elizabeth Warren, Elizabeth Warren, Elizabeth Warren.

So, we know one thing with almost 100% certainty: Elizabeth Warren identified herself as a minority law professor. We know something else with 90%+ certainty: (at least some) folks at Harvard were almost certainly aware that she identified as a minority law professor, though they may not have known which ethnic group she claimed to be belong to, and it may not have played any role in her hiring.

But it gets even more interesting: once Warren joined the Harvard faculty, she dropped off the list of minority law faculty. Now that’s passing strange. When the AALS directory form came around before Warren arrived at Harvard, she was proud enough of her Native American ancestry to ask that she be listed among the minority law professors. (Or, in the unlikely even that she just allowed law school administrators to fill out the forms for her without reviewing them, they were aware that she claimed such ancestry, and she didn’t object when she was listed.) Once she arrived at Harvard, however, she no longer chose to be listed as a minority law professor.

Verrrrrry curious. I’m not hung up on the fact that she apparently can’t produce any documents attesting to her ancestry; that’s not unusual when it comes to genealogy, although it does raise the question of what proof is sufficient to justify claiming minority status. (Follow the link to Bernstein’s post and read down for more on that.) The fact that her name disappeared from the minority listings in the AALS directory is interesting, though. Three possibilities. One: She was lying all along and dropped the charade once her mission of getting a job at Harvard had been accomplished. Two: She sincerely thought she had Native American ancestry but then learned something in 1995 that convinced her otherwise, so she quietly dropped minority status. In that case, though, why is she claiming it now when the press is grilling her on it? Three: Maybe the standards of proof for claiming minority status changed at Harvard or AALS such that Warren felt obliged to drop her official claim. She still thinks of herself as Native American, in other words, but she can’t prove it to the relevant authority’s comfort. That should be easy enough to check, though. Bottom line: If she’s serious about her heritage, why stop acknowledging it in the mid-90s? There’s no obvious explanation.

While you mull that, here’s Scott Brown enjoying one of the greatest moments of retail politics in recent American history.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; brown; cherokee; demagogue; demagoguery; diversity; elizabethwarren; indian; liarwarren; liberalhypocrisy; massachusetts; nativeamerican; onepercentwarren; scottbrown; waronwomen; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2012 6:50:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh! My Goodness. A Democrat lied? How shocking. Frankly I am shocked that anyone would be shocked.


2 posted on 05/01/2012 6:52:44 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In other news.

From the BOSTON HERALD:

Elizabeth Warren’s embattled campaign: Cherokee tie found 5 generations ago

EXCERPT:


Desperately scrambling to validate Democrat Elizabeth Warren’s Native American heritage amid questions about whether she used her minority status to further her career, the Harvard Law professor’s campaign last night finally came up with what they claim is a Cherokee connection — her great-great-great-grandmother.

She would be 1/32nd of Elizabeth Warren’s total ancestry,” noted genealogist Christopher Child said, referring to the candidate’s great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smith, who is listed on an Oklahoma marriage certificate as Cherokee. Smith is an ancestor on Warren’s mother’s side, Child said.
3 posted on 05/01/2012 6:53:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m new to FR but I’ve done a lot of reading, so let me see if I got this straight.

Brown is not a “true” red meat conservative so Warren should win, despite the political reality in MA and despite the horror she would inflict on the state and the country.

I think I got it right.


4 posted on 05/01/2012 6:57:41 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

ummm... because all Indians were men?


5 posted on 05/01/2012 7:00:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
How! White Squaw princess not Cherokee enough to be honorary member of tribe. No smoke-um peace pipe.
In all seriousness why do we care at all?

Disclaimer: the above is not intended offend to any native Americans. I'm part Cherokee myself, but you have to be 1/8 to be a officially Cherokee.

6 posted on 05/01/2012 7:01:00 AM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. II Corinthians 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wouldn’t spend a lot of time on this. I used to live on OK where she was born and raised and based upon the large segment of OK’s Population being Native American there is a good probability that she may have a someone in her ancestral background that is Native American. I think her heart however is more “Native Hippie”. Today the Occupy Wall Street Crowd plans demonstrations throughout the Nation and she publicy backed them. The Brown campaign should focus on the Anarchists that she supports.


7 posted on 05/01/2012 7:02:45 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is truth, then, a male-only concept?


8 posted on 05/01/2012 7:02:58 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Brown should say that his interest is in giving service, not taking umbrage.

The more she complains, the more she is exposed as self-interested, rather than public spirited.


9 posted on 05/01/2012 7:06:14 AM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sorry, Lizzy, but the ‘Sexist’ Card doesn’t have the universal acceptance that the ‘Race’ Card does.............


10 posted on 05/01/2012 7:09:35 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“She would be 1/32nd of Elizabeth Warren’s total ancestry,”

That's just slightly less than Soetoro's American citizenship ancestry.

11 posted on 05/01/2012 7:13:39 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It should be a felony to mention “sex” and “Elizabeth Warren” in the same article.


12 posted on 05/01/2012 7:14:04 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repub's paid as much attention to Rush Limbaugh as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is going to be fun. My favorite so far is that they are calling her “Pinocchio-hontas”. Can’t wait for the photoshops.


13 posted on 05/01/2012 7:15:55 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Actually, yes, in a way.

You see, “truth” is intolerant, and inherently says all other claims are untrue. That’s divisive and doesn’t lead to everyone getting along in a non-competitive, cooperative way. It’s individualistic.


14 posted on 05/01/2012 7:16:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The best tactic would be for Brown to keep his mouth shut. Don't give her any ammo.

"Never get in your enemy's way when he is busy destroying himself."
- - Sun Tzu, The Art Of War

15 posted on 05/01/2012 7:16:15 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I'd never seen a picture of here before.

16 posted on 05/01/2012 7:16:50 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idaho_Cowboy

RE: I’m part Cherokee myself, but you have to be 1/8 to be a officially Cherokee.

If Elizabeth Warren can get into Harvard with aid at 1/32, it should be a breeze for you at 1/8 :)


17 posted on 05/01/2012 7:17:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

her

here

hare

hair

err


18 posted on 05/01/2012 7:18:46 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: married21

Sure, take all the umbrage, don’t leave any for anyone else!

Apologies to Animaniacs...


19 posted on 05/01/2012 7:21:53 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

I think I got it right

...makes your head explode doesn’t it.


20 posted on 05/01/2012 7:23:18 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Is truth, then, a male-only concept?

If you ask a woman, they will tell you 'no'.

21 posted on 05/01/2012 7:24:13 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Caption: I only look “this much” lesbian.


22 posted on 05/01/2012 7:24:13 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“So... which door would the other door say would lead to safety.”


23 posted on 05/01/2012 7:25:13 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Yeah... blue eyes and blond hair, definitely an Indian trait.


24 posted on 05/01/2012 7:26:05 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB
“So... which door would the other door say would lead to safety.”

The one that's not lying.

25 posted on 05/01/2012 7:27:56 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Both my parents came from Sicily,,,therefore I am Sicel,Greek, Roman, Vandal, Ostrogoth, North African Moorish, Black African, Norman Viking, French, Spanish, Italian.........
AMERICAN!


26 posted on 05/01/2012 7:31:04 AM PDT by BilLies (If FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS had a son, he would look just like BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Scott Brown is the same as Mitt Romney, and that’s no good.


27 posted on 05/01/2012 7:32:38 AM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Scott Brown is the same as Mitt Romney, and that’s no good.


28 posted on 05/01/2012 7:32:38 AM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
I rather like Little Left Wing.


29 posted on 05/01/2012 7:32:57 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Well done—I think you get the prize today.


30 posted on 05/01/2012 7:46:18 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

someone on another thread coined her, “Sacca-ja-hooey”. LOL


31 posted on 05/01/2012 7:46:18 AM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Reported today on Boston TV that her great, great, great grandmother was an indian. That makes her 1/64?

That’s a pretty thin resume, but it might be enough for the Globe to cover for her. “Her native American bloodline has been established, despite insinuations by the Brown campaign to the contrary.”


32 posted on 05/01/2012 7:46:28 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Hahaha!


33 posted on 05/01/2012 7:48:24 AM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Ummmm hmmmmm. OK -- blue-eyed blond Indians were very common in Massachusetts, and obviously suffered the pains of racial discrimination!

Scott Brown has brown eyes! Using the liberal's criteria, he has a good claim having a Latino or African-American heritage!

34 posted on 05/01/2012 7:59:38 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

I believe the minimum for listing yourself as a minority is one-eighth. If you go back five or six generations it is likely we would all be some kind of minority. And, by the way, very likely we would all have ancestors who were slaves at one point or another. So her claim is bogus even if this the research is correct, which I doubt can be verified. People back then died early,husbands and wives remarried, and records were full of errors. Not to worry though, is she can claim minority status on such a slim reed then we can all do it. So let’s have at it, we are all minorities now, we all qualify, so let the box checking begin.


35 posted on 05/01/2012 8:02:34 AM PDT by Old North State (Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

“I think I got it right.”

There are exceptions to the “Suicide Pact” of the “true” red meat conservatives” and there are some posters who provide good and useful information. For that reason I tend to walk around the angry piles in the road
that the “Suicide Pact” members leave.


36 posted on 05/01/2012 8:06:49 AM PDT by BilLies (If FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS had a son, he would look just like BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
One ten thousandth? That won't get anyone on the tribal rolls around here (except as idiot of the week).

Better be looking at 25% or 50% to claim 'native status', and a verifiable and traceable ancestry to claim 'ancestry'.

That's the first problem.

The second is that to determine ancestry %, use 1/(2^n), where n is the number of generations involved. Denominators are: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768, for the first 15 generations back.

No single ancestor gives a 1/10000th bloodline.

Now, I understand that family trees can get complicated, but I think if someone is going to claim something they can benefit from (in this case 'minority affiliation'), they should be able to back it up.

37 posted on 05/01/2012 8:08:57 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Yeah... blue eyes and blond hair, definitely an Indian trait.

That alone is not a disqualifier, just an external expression of mixed genetic traits.

One of my wife's uncles and one of the grand kids have blonde hair and blue eyes--all are 1/4 or more Chippewa. Others have red hair, but brown eyes, still Chippewa.

38 posted on 05/01/2012 8:15:32 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My Dad was born in Norman, OK. I’ve heard that almost everyone currently living that was born in Oklahoma is part Cherokee. Maybe I should start claiming minority status like Warren. Might improve my job search.


39 posted on 05/01/2012 8:29:26 AM PDT by DFG ("Dumb, Dependent, and Democrat is no way to go through life" - Louie Gohmert (R-TX))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it determined like blackness, by the “one drop” rule?


40 posted on 05/01/2012 8:44:50 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it determined like blackness, by the “one drop” rule?


41 posted on 05/01/2012 8:45:33 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander
Brown is not a “true” red meat conservative so Warren should win, despite the political reality in MA and despite the horror she would inflict on the state and the country.

Yes. There are folks here who hate Scott Brown more than Warren because he's impure, despite the phenomenal improvement he is over Kennedy he replaced, Kerry he serves with or other New Englander Senators.

These cranks lack pragmatism, sense or sanity.

42 posted on 05/01/2012 8:51:37 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Newt says, "A nominee that depresses turnout won't beat Barack Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Give the tribe wouldn’t recognize her or even her parent’s “claim,” it’s true shameful for her have claimed “minority” status for employment purposes.


43 posted on 05/01/2012 8:57:43 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Newt says, "A nominee that depresses turnout won't beat Barack Obama.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I think I can claim at least as much Native American ancestry as Warren -- it's not at all uncommon in families whose roots go back to colonial times. But since I have blond hair and blue eyes, it would be crazy for me to believe that I've ever been discriminated against because of Native American ancestry. I would reasonably expect to be laughed out of any school or job interview if I ever tried this.

Except, apparently, at Harvard University....

(Other than at Harvard, I could plausibly be arrested for fraud if I tried it -- see below!)

Definition and origins of Native Americans:

Definition. As described in DoD Directive 1350.2 a Native-American or Alaskan Native is a person having origins in the original peoples of North America, AND who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition.

There is no one contemporary majority definition that establishes a person’s identity as a Native-American. The Bureau of Census states that “anybody who claims to be a Native-American” is a Native-American. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), which is the organization responsible for monitoring Indian affairs and issues, general definition to be a Native-American, you must:

Be 1/4-1/2 Native-American blood at a minimum.

Live on or near trust lands/reservations.

Be on a tribal roll recognized by the federal government.

Trace ancestry back three generations.

Be approved by BIA officials.

As I read it, according to The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) (which should know an Indian when they see one), she isn't an Indian.

44 posted on 05/01/2012 9:02:56 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This lie will have zero impact in Assachusetts. The people willing to vote for her already accept lies as truth and only harden their opinion when the lies are pointed out to them. There is no more hope for Assachusetts than there is for Clownifornia.


45 posted on 05/01/2012 9:31:37 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Yeah, I’m something like 1/131000th Powhatan. Even if I could claim something from that I wouldn’t. I’d rather be judged for what I do than my distant ancestors.


46 posted on 05/01/2012 9:45:12 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I am red haired and blue eyed. I worked for about a year for the Mashantucket Pequot tribe here in Connecticut. The first tribal member I met could have passed for my brother or at least a cousin. He was red haired and blue eyed. The tribe contained all sorts of phenotypes; lots of blondes, red heads, brunettes, whites, blacks even an Indian (as in Bangalore) with no explanation or excuses offered.

I cannot rationally argue with anyone who claims that the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (as it’s officially known) is a total fraud and a fiction. It does, however, allow a bunch of wannabes to run a casino.


47 posted on 05/01/2012 9:46:57 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh good grief, she’s playing the vagina card?


48 posted on 05/01/2012 9:56:28 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (SpaceX Dragon launch to ISS, Cape Canaveral AFS, May 7, 9:38 AM EDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
No, I think I'm only 1/32.
There are some tribes, with few members, that will claim you with as little as a 1/64. But the Cherokee nation requires 1/8 Cherokee blood, because they larger.
49 posted on 05/01/2012 11:58:08 AM PDT by Idaho_Cowboy (Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. II Corinthians 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Thank you for the response. It was a good rebuttal.

We are all ‘related’ if one goes far enough back. My grandmother was a full blooded Indian Squaw. However, I do not claim to be an ‘native American Indian’.

This woman is 1/32 Indian (so she says). Probably had an ancestor somewhere along the line that molested children, so is she also a pedophile?

What native customs was she raised in and does she follow?

If there were no monetary benefit to claiming to be an Indian, how many people like this woman would ‘claim’ to be one?


50 posted on 05/01/2012 12:17:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson