Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1
Clouds? It's called water vapor.

Forget the clouds for a moment. What about the ice cores that debunked the CO2 increases predates global temperature increases? No. Not good enough to spur doubt?

How about we go back to the climate models from the 1980s and 1990s that Hanson presented to Congress. The global temperatures, ocean temperatures and sea levels are all WAY below his “Best case scenario” if we would have taken draconian measures to counter global warming back then.

We now have 30 years of data post the invention of “climate modeling.” Every single prediction of 10, 20 and 30 years dating back to 2000 is proved horrifically wrong. They are all off by more than 100%. Still not enough to say there is reason for debate?

The global temperatures measure by satellites put in orbit in the 1980s to measure global temperatures have been recording some pretty significant and consistent data. I would ask Hanson and corp to provide me a report of this data and an explanation for why the earth has almost completely stopped warming while the CO2 emissions have gone up even more than they predicted back when the satellites were put in orbit to monitor the global temperatures.

There is a simple case to be made for challenging the science. There is a strong case that their computer modeling schemes are false. There is absolute empirical proof that more money, regulation and taxation will not affect or prevent the warming of our planet.

12 posted on 05/01/2012 10:45:15 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tenacious 1

Darn right that their computer modeling schemes are false. Back when the Cimategate documents were released, one of the documents provided a vector of “fudge factors” used by one of the models to recompute actual temperature data to ensure that the desired “my God, manmade Global Warming is out of control” results were obtained.


39 posted on 05/01/2012 1:37:17 PM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Obamanation--the most corrupt regime since Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Tenacious 1
There is absolute empirical proof that more money, regulation and taxation will not affect or prevent the warming of our planet.

Yes, but MORE MONEY, REGULATION, and TAXATION are the only things politicians offer to 'solve' our problems.

When EVEN MORE money is needed, they make up new problems.

Global Warming.

Racism.

Freon and the Ozone.

Asbestos in Schools.

46 posted on 05/02/2012 8:27:48 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson