Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

“and polls say 97 percent of working climate scientists now see global warming as a serious risk. “

Scientists who disagree are no longer working, perhaps?


2 posted on 05/01/2012 10:30:11 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow

The 97% comes from scientists polled a a global warming convention. Like all GW statistics, it is fake.

Pray for America


6 posted on 05/01/2012 10:31:49 AM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

consensus is science- ask anyone in a poll!


9 posted on 05/01/2012 10:38:02 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

What, I wonder, is a “climate scientist?” It doesn’t shock me that the preponderance of scientists who identify themselves as such would take “Global Warming” or “Climate Change” as a given. When all you have is a hammer everything starts to look like a nail.


30 posted on 05/01/2012 11:28:31 AM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
polls say 97 percent of working climate scientists now see global warming as a serious risk.

Prove that. These shmucks can't "prove" anything.

FMCDH(BITS)

31 posted on 05/01/2012 12:15:59 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

Funny that...

I was participating in “picking a fight in a mental ward” with some resident libs over on youtube,
and none of them seemed to want to respond to the idea that “climate scientists” who dissented from the politically correct AGW theory would not get their next research grant.

But, the residents were quick to claim that the dissenting scientists were all paid for by corporations & big oil.


35 posted on 05/01/2012 12:50:37 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
This 97% was a poll that sampled only about 77 scientists and the questions were vague and didn't mention mans contribution to warming/cooling.

This is the basis for “consensus”.

Rather pathetic.

On the brighter side of the news, over 700 scientists signed a petition objecting to AGW.

Not to mention 49 recently objecting to NASA’s miring themselves in AGW.

NYT wordsmiths..........gotta hate them.

40 posted on 05/01/2012 1:50:33 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson