Posted on 05/01/2012 4:38:18 PM PDT by mandaladon
There’s outrage in Norfolk, Va., today after a white couple was attacked by a group of 100 black teenagers, and the local newspaper did not report on the incident for two weeks, despite the victims being employees of the paper.
Even today, the Virginian-Pilot did not cover the crime as news, but rather as an opinion piece by columnist Michelle Washington. “Wave after wave of young men surged forward to take turns punching and kicking their victim,” Washington wrote, describing the onslaught that began when Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami stopped at a red light while driving home from a show on a Saturday night. A crowd of at least 100 black young people was on the sidewalk.
“Rostami locked her car door. Someone threw a rock at her window. Forster got out to confront the rock-thrower, and that’s when the beating began. …
“The victim’s friend, a young woman, tried to pull him back into his car. Attackers came after her, pulling her hair, punching her head and causing a bloody scratch to the surface of her eye. She called 911. A recording told her all lines were busy. She called again. Busy. On her third try, she got through and, hysterical, could scream only their location. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. Church and Brambleton. It happened four blocks from where they work, here at the Virginian-Pilot.”
Washington says neither suffered grave injuries, but both were out of work for a week. Forster’s torso ached from blows to his ribs, and he retained a thumb-sized bump on his head. Rostami reportedly fears to be alone in her home., while Forster wishes he’d stayed in the car.
The columnist admits the story has not, until today, appeared in the Virginian-Pilot.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Of course not. Just like the SA members never saw "The Night of the Long Knives" coming, and you can bet many SA officers claimed with their dying breaths that they were loyal the the Fuhrer, today's leftists will be crying about their support and loyalty as they're stood up against the wall.
Mark
I’ve seen that site before, thanks for the reminder-just bookmarked it. That’s kind of what I’m talking about, but more a kind of Drudge Report strictly for reporting black on white crime, a site accessed by the masses (hence the need to be free of silly rhetoric). We can read of countless occurrences of black on black crime in the msm, the rare white on black crime is of course headline news (they’ll even dig up a month-old crime if it serves their purpose), but black on white crime, if reported at all, is given short shrift, often with the race of victim and/or perpetrator blanked. This is being done purposely to skew the reality which is that blacks commit most interracial crime upon whites. The rape statistics are especially skewed.
Damn!
How many "sons" does Obama have, anyway? (yes, I do expect Obama to once again say, "if I had a hundred sons..."
The MSM is the most dangerous entity in the United States of America.
PERIOD.
It does sort of suggest that these urban animals don't really need an excuse.
Assuming that the Justice Department allows it, I, for one, would welcome such a list.
PC needs to be pounded over the head relentlessly.
How long can the majority keep pretending they can't notice?
There are 55 “murders” still unsolved from the LA riots from 1992. When the Trayvon riots start, take good aim and cover your face from the cams
I’m hoping that my nephew will come around one of these days, due to his being in that category (liberals who’ve been mugged). We’ll see how long it takes. I won’t hold my breath. He’s very stubborn, especially when he’s wrong about something. He’s very much like his father (my ex-BIL).
I’d like to know what’s going on with that-my understanding is that 2007 is the last year complete crime statistics broken down by race were published by the Feds (the best compilation I’ve seen on it, called “The Color Of Crime” is from 2005, I believe). Even then, they were fudging the statistics with Hispanics depending on whether they were victim or perpetrator.
Make some paragraph's in your posts...
Heck of a lot easier to read....
FWIW-
This is what I call a "road incident". This is not a case of what kind of fortress you have or how much ammo you have in the old bunker. This was a situation where two people caught in a bad situation, ended up in the "victim" box on the police report. AND ALL OF THIS CR@P IS BEING FUELED BY THE MSM AS PART OF AN AGENDA. This is exactly why, on my daily commute of 138 miles, my Excursion always has:
a) no less than half a tank of fuel (44 gallon tank)
b) 2 cell phones operable, with chargers and VHF/UHF comms as well
c) one EDC (Every Day Carry) bag with a back-up Glock 31, loaded, with 2 extra mags, and various "good to have" items like food, water, and first aid
d) one AR-15 in M-4 configuration with tac vest (360 rounds) and an extra 6-pack of mags (180 rounds)
e) tactical 12 gauge pump carrying a total of 16 rounds on/in the weapon and an extra 36 rounds in the ammo pouch
f) one grouchy old driver with his primary sidearm, who is not willing to take an @$$ whipping from anyone
g) and AAA just in case I have a breakdown that I can't remedy on my own with what I have on board
I don't drive into "high risk areas"... At least that's not what I call them. I drive into "target rich environments." I'll go where I d@mn well please if I want to take that route, and if someone wants to mess with me... Well, to borrow from Walt Kowalski in the movie Gran Torino: "Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have f****d with? That's me."
I've had enough of this crap... If I get attacked, I'm going to have bodies stacked up around me like cord-wood by the time LEO's get there. Enough is enough. They want a war? Let's party...
/rant
Will do. I’m bad about run-on sentences too. Typical female!
LOL, he got out of the car armed with nothing more than his over-inflated sense of superiority.
well, technically “Rostami” is Irani-American, so “brown”
You know that I should probably let this comment go by, but I gotta respond.
I am most confused about how the racial categories have changed and expanded over the years. I also dislike that phrase “brown people” although I will admit my own child said it to me in youthful innocence years ago.
My understanding, from my own totally devoid of any racial prejudice father was that there were 3 races. Caucasian (white), Negro (black) and Asian (yellow).
I do understand that these 3 categories do not admit of a needed group of “indians” or “indigenous people” such as American Indians and their descendants, esp. those who now are called “hispanic” in the USA but who make up the vast majority of the population of Latin America, and other folks who are precisely described as “pacific islanders”, etc.
But it seems to me that somewhere along the way the left has again left us with three categories: Caucasian (white/bad); Slant-eyed Asian (yellow/bad) and Everybody else (brown to black and good as gold).
Sorry, this is a post that would cause my good old lefty ex-friend to call me a racist.
Oh yeah, and btw, where Elizabeth Warren would fit in, I have no idea. But I have no doubt she’d do her best to squeeze her little phoney multi-culti butt in as well as she could.
I’m willing to move to world where each of us is judged by the content of his/her own character. When the left is willing to do that, let me know.
That’ll teach the white guy to carry a gun.
Sometimes you gotta shoot your way out of the jungle.
The confusion is equating Caucasian with White. Skin color has little to do with race.
If the skeletons of Khadafi, Ayatollah Khomenei and Saddam Hussein were found in a park somewhere, the coroner would report that the skeletons of three white men were found.
All Europeans, Arabs, Iranians, Indians, etc. are basically Caucasians.
There really are only either four or five races; Caucasian, Sub-Saharan African, Australian/Papuan (Aborigines, etc.), Asian, and then some class American Indians separately, others include them as a subgroup of Asians.
THANK YOU!
This is why I am so gosh darned tired of hearing about these “brown” people.
MOST OF THEM ARE WHITE.
And many “Asians” are now seen as “victims” while other “Asians” are seen as another privileged class like whites who must be willing to give way so some “brown” person can move ahead.
And those could be the exact same Asian individuals depending on a crap shoot of the dice.
You’d think in this day of “CSI” and “Bones” people would be getting the clue that our racial classification (if needed) has little to do with our skin color.
I do love those funky white people, like the Azerbaijanis. so Muslim, so white, so obscure.
It is actually interesting to look at the globe and see “race” melding into “race”, but no matter how interesting it is from a scientific view it says nothing about any individual person.
Which is the point that matters.
Its no accident that certain “brown races” attack whites and asians more. You know the two races that have advanced the human race the most in technology, medicine, science, discoveries,and has the most cultural history than any other of the races. They are no coincidence, they are taught to hate us early on because we are successful. Thats the bottom line.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.