Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul supporters create delegate mischief
The Washington Times ^ | May 1, 2012 | Ralph Z. Hallow

Posted on 05/02/2012 7:48:18 AM PDT by no dems

Mitt Romney may be the presumptive GOP nominee, but Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is quietly racking up some organizational victories that could complicate Mr. Romney’s coronation at the Republican Convention in Tampa, Fla.

Exploiting party rules, loyalists for the congressman from Texas in recent days have engineered post-primary organizing coups in states such as Louisiana and Alaska, confirming what party regulars say would be an effort to grab an outsized role in the convention and the party’s platform deliberations.

In Massachusetts, Paul loyalists over the weekend helped block more than half of Mr. Romney’s preferred nominees from being named delegates at state party caucuses — even though Mr. Romney won his home state’s primary with 72 percent of the vote. Many state GOP establishment figures, including longtime state Republican National Committee member Ron Kaufman, won’t be going to Tampa in August as official delegates.

Paul, “is doing more with less than any modern presidential campaign in recent memory,” said Doug Wead, a Paul campaign adviser. “More surprises coming,” Mr. Wead blogged this week. “It means that Ron Paul will be a factor in Tampa.”

In DeKalb County, Ga., Gingrich won the state’s March 6 primary, but the selection of delegates to the national convention takes place in subsequent party caucuses. So Paul loyalists can run for delegate slots ostensibly as supporters of Mr. Gingrich or another candidate.

In Alaska — where Mr. Paul came in third in the primary — his supporters organized to elect two Paul loyalists as chairman and co-chairman of the state party, beating out candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.

In Alaska, tea-party-backed 2010 GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller and wife Kathleen struck an apparent alliance with Mr. Paul’s team, and she won election March 27 as a delegate to the Tampa convention.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: delegate; paul; rino
I remember in 1988, when "The Moral Majority" folks and the Pat Robertson supporters gave the Establishment Republicans holy heck in States like Michigan. I love it when the long-time Party operatives, who think their positions are assigned by divine decree, have to sit on the sidelines and watch new activists, from outside the Establishment, run the show.
1 posted on 05/02/2012 7:48:27 AM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems

I wonder if this will kill any hope of a political future for Joe Miller in Alaska.


2 posted on 05/02/2012 7:52:08 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Mitt Romney may be the presumptive GOP nominee

I see this a lot, especially with regards to the GOP.

Shouldn't the correct word be "presumed GOP nominee". It seems to me "presumptive GOP nominee" implies that he is unjustifiably self-presuming the nomination, rather than that everyone else is presuming he will be the nominee.
3 posted on 05/02/2012 7:56:09 AM PDT by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Paul and his supporters are spitting in the wind. Romney and the “Republican Establishment” will control the convention just like they have controlled the entire primary process up to now and guaranteed no other candidate stood a chance. Paul chance of staging a successful coup at the convention is about as likely as a outside candidate staging a coup in the old Soviet Union, that is to say impossible...
4 posted on 05/02/2012 8:02:35 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Many state GOP establishment figures, including longtime state Republican National Committee member Ron Kaufman, won’t be going to Tampa in August as official delegates.
________________________________________________

Oh dear...

The Romney Loyalists arent invited to the coronation ..


5 posted on 05/02/2012 8:05:44 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Who is left standing? Romney, or Paul...

This Is not a difficult choice to make.

Pro- abortion or pro- life?
Pro- bigger government or pro-Constitution?

If Willard wins the GOP nod, Obama wins re-election.


6 posted on 05/02/2012 8:09:30 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Ron Paul supporters biggest problem is...Ron Paul.


7 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:28 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

It sure pees on their little, cozy closed campfire doesn’t it?


8 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:51 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Study closely socialist Hugo Chavez' usage of 'popular masses' in the streets to thwart 1992 coup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

In Alaska — where Mr. Paul came in third in the primary — his supporters organized to elect two Paul loyalists as chairman and co-chairman of the state party, beating out candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.
______________________________________________

“candidates backed by the Alaska GOP establishment.”

again more Romney Loyalists who get to stay home and watch it on TV...

You have to give Ron Paul his due...

He must have some people with good organizational skills...

Even Willard with all his deep pockets couldnt buy that kind of maneuver...

Willie Mitty could have been beaten or at least had less votes delegates etc..

Too much caution and fear...


9 posted on 05/02/2012 8:18:21 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Paul, “is doing more with less than any modern presidential campaign in recent memory,” said Doug Wead, a Paul campaign adviser.

For those of you who don't know Wead's history, he was one of the big shots in Amway back in the late '70s and 80's.

10 posted on 05/02/2012 8:21:39 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

is about as likely as a
__________________________________

Oh I dunno...

My mother used to tell me the story of Sir Francis Drake and the Spanish Armada...


11 posted on 05/02/2012 8:29:22 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I say good for them.


12 posted on 05/02/2012 8:30:02 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Excellent news, paul maybe a little nutty, but if he is giving the GOPe fits then I say more power to him. Plus alot of his followers are Tea Party like people that want smaller government and less spending.


13 posted on 05/02/2012 8:41:08 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Rather than say much, I'll just post a link and a quote from the "about" page of the folks that are now half the delegation here...

Massachusetts Blue Republicans

"We are Democrats and Independents. We are registering Republican for this election season to nominate Ron Paul. With our numbers, we can join the "Ron Paul rEVOLution", win the delegate positions to the Republican National Convention and absolutely ensure that Ron Paul becomes the nominee, and then, the President."

14 posted on 05/02/2012 8:55:30 AM PDT by C210N (Wanted: Tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems; All

Maybe he is attempting to force Mitt to pick his son for the VP slot. It would not be a bad move if it happened. Imagine the voice Paul will have in Tampa if he is able to hijack 20% to 40% of Romney’s delegates.

If only Newt had been half as organized as Paul was before he decided to run. Then maybe we would be discussing a Gingrich vs the Muslim in Chief race instead.

Just my 2cents, for what it’s worth.....


15 posted on 05/02/2012 9:07:14 AM PDT by OneVike ((Just a Christian waiting to go home) internet ID:: impeachobamanow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I appreciate your post. I love learning and being intellectually challenged. And, I think your are correct in your assessment here. Never even thought about it. Thanks.

no dems


16 posted on 05/02/2012 9:07:30 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

If Willard wins the GOP nod, Obama wins re-election.
_____________________________________________________________

Don’t count on it. Mitt Romney wants this so bad he can taste it. He’s been running for President for 4 years. He is hungry. He has the money. He has the organization. He has 6 million Mormon foot soldiers. The Mormon church has $$$$$...much dinero. He proved in the Primary Process that he will do what it takes to win. And, flipping the coin over, many people who voted for Obama wish they could take their vote back. And, they will do so on November 6, 2012. I loathe the Clintons, but Obama even makes Bill and Hill seem palatable. He is much despised. I could give you more reasons why I think Romney will win, but it would be too lengthy.


17 posted on 05/02/2012 9:16:46 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Re: Your tagline: The Marxist Muslim hates you more than the Moderate Mormon.


18 posted on 05/02/2012 9:20:29 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I wanted Michelle Bachman to win, she didn’t. I wanted Herman Cain to win he didn’t. I wanted Rick Santorum to win then he stuck his foot in his mouth many times and I decided I wasn’t a Rick Santorum guy. I would have gladly voted for him in the general. I used to love Gingrich but he has not aged well, he has become somewhat cantankerous. I have supposed that Newt was the brightest of the bunch but maybe Paul is the brightest after all. There is a lot to like about Paul, but, he would not be able to win the general election. He has said too many dumb sounding things, just like Santorum and Newt.

For Bachman, Santorum and Newt it has come time to support Romney and they are. The time for back biting and complaining is over. The Money RINO guy has it sewed up. Either Romney wins or Obama wins. I am not one of those people who jump out of everything just because MY guy didn’t make it.

This country cannot take another Obama presidency and expect to survive anything like what we know of it today.

When your cousin begged you as a young person to go on a blind date with someone who had a great personality, you didn’t tell them NO! You reluctantly said ok, then did the best you could to have a decent time. Sometimes you may have even been able to enjoy the date.

Reluctantly I will vote for Romney, it is too late to do anything else constructive. I intend to make the best of the date and try to enjoy it for the good of the country.

Is it possible that I don’t like a lot of what Romney has done in the past? You betcha. Is it possible I don’t like a lot of what Obama has done in the past?

Romney may not be good but he is not Obama. Obama has been the worst president this country has ever seen, much worse than the next closest competitor. I would vote for Carter, either Clinton, any Kennedy any Roosevelt or whom every you can think of over Obama. Romney is not as bad as Carter, Clinton or any of the others.I will not be excited about Romney but you can bet I will vote for Anybody But Obama.

For a Republican to win the presidency Moderates have to vote for a conservative or conservatives have to vote for a moderate. No matter how much you don’t like it is a simple fact of life, there simply are not enough conservatives to win an election, we need moderates to vote with us or we have to vote, like this time, with them.


19 posted on 05/02/2012 9:22:22 AM PDT by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Wilard couldn't even beat out McCain last time around. How is the guy who couldn't beat McCain supposed to beat the guy who beat McCain?

Especially when he has done so much to completely jettison his conservative voting base? Pro-choice. Pro-gun control. Pro-government run health care...

BS. Wilard will get steamrolled.

People like you didn't learn the lesson of Ford, Bush 41, Dole, or McCain...

20 posted on 05/02/2012 9:30:32 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

I cannot, will not, EVER vote for a pro-abort/bigger government/anti-RKBA asshole like Willard.

You ask too much.


21 posted on 05/02/2012 9:34:13 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Willie Mitty could have been beaten or at least had less votes delegates etc..

Too much caution and fear...
_____________________________________________________________
I respectfully disagree. The problem was not too much caution and fear, but the fact that the good Conservatives, who had a chance of being elected, did not run and we were dealt a lousy hand. And, in addition to that, the process sucks. I live in Texas and I did not even get a say in who the nominee will be because our Primary is May 29. States like New Hampshire, Maryland and Connecticut chose MY Party’s nominee FOR ME.


22 posted on 05/02/2012 9:41:26 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig

I wanted Rick Santorum to win then he stuck his foot in his mouth many times and I decided I wasn’t a Rick Santorum guy.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Same here. He turned out to be ALMOST as stupid as Rick Perry.


23 posted on 05/02/2012 9:58:23 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

BS, A lot of Paul supporters are Occutards who want to push socialism in America and destroy Capitalism. I don’t know one Tea Party member who is a Paul supporter.

He is a truther who blames America for the attacks on 9/11 and he is a libertarian nut bag.

I would vote for Romney or Obama before I would vote for Paul. And I hate Romney and Obama.


24 posted on 05/02/2012 10:08:27 AM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
So you'll vote for pro-abort/anti-Constitution type over someone who is pro-life/pro-Constitution.

Because you've listened to his detractors instead of figuring things out for yourself.

Nice to know.

And people wonder why I think we're doomed as a Country.

25 posted on 05/02/2012 10:53:15 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

So you believe that Paul is all that?

You’ve not been reading a lot of the facts posted here on FR showing that Paul is a liberal as big as Romney then.

Over the last few months, FR has been zotting all Paul supporters for their crap.

Paul understands the Constitution about as much as Romney and Obama do. Paul is a blame America truther and Jew Hater. He might have stumbled on some good ideas about fiscal things but his other ideas and beliefs are pure nuts crazy. He’s the darling of the occutard movement and all pro-dope, pro-prostitute hippies.

We are doomed as a country because George Soros has paid for Obama, Romney and Paul. Proof of Paul being under the Soros thumb was posted here numerous times. Glen Beck showed the link.

Keep supporting Paul. You’ll be a memory here.


26 posted on 05/02/2012 11:06:03 AM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Here are some links showing what Paul is all about. Still think he’s THE MAN?

Ron Paul supports legal dope and prostitution
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/05/06/Ron_Paul_on_Prostitution_Gay_Marriage/

Starts half way in the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mz9pDGHBTo&feature=related

Nevada prostitutes endorse Ron Paul
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/06/nevada-prostitutes-endorse-ron-paul/

White supremecist David Duke endorses Ron Paul;
http://patdollard.com/2011/12/former-kkk-grand-wizard-david-duke-says-he%E2%80%99s-voting-for-ron-paul/

Ron Paul refuses to disavow STORMFRONT associations
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/45537/ron-paul-refuses-to-disavow-stormfront-other-anti-semitic-racist-groups-openly-campaigning-for-him/

Ron Paul SUPPORTS NAMBLA
http://videosift.com/video/Does-Ron-Paul-Support-NAMBLA-Well-yes-and-no
http://www.dailypaul.com/70100/age-of-consent?page=1

Why do the Ron Paul guys support gay marriage?
http://www.queerty.com/ron-paul-on-gay-marriage-20071210/

the 2008 RONULAN economic advisor to Ron paul saying that libertarians need to infiltrate the GOP
Libertarians need to infiltrate the GOP
VIDEO of Schiff saying just that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ncLTFoTFa8

An organization called Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth video taped an inpromtu appearance with Ron Paul and recorded some of his comments. They can be found here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/

While Ron Paul has said on TV shows such as Glen Beck that he dismisses the major theories, he openly says there is a coverup of what went on yet refuses to elaborate on just what is covered up. The 9/11 Comission clearly showed that intelligence failures happened because of Clinton era laws that prevented our inteligence agancies from communicating with each other.
On the website CONSPIRACY PLANET, information about Ron Paul and issues similar to this can be found:
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=90

Ron Paul has publically said that the CIA has accomplished a coup against America and needs to be taken out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dECSYm5bSM

A direct quote from this conference is as such:
(January 20, 2010) House Rep. Ron Paul says the CIA has in effect carried out a “coup” against the US government, and the intelligence agency needs to be “taken out.”
Speaking to an audience of like-minded libertarians at a Campaign for Liberty regional conference in Atlanta this past weekend, the Texas Republican said: “There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military. They’re the ones who are over there lobbing missiles and bombs on countries...”
Additional video proof of him saying this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SZKLvEOp9c

And here is one prominant website that supports the 9/11 conspiracy theories, calling for a RON PAUL PROVISIONAL ARMY to take over after we investigate the 9/11 events:
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Among the other kooky connections to Ron Paul, is a UFO COnnection. I have yet to find the original article, but numerous articles repeat the belief of Ron Paul’s that UFO’s are real. Some of the Ron Paul sites have soeone trying to mock this belief, but the Ron Paul site, DailyPaul.com says this:
http://dailypaul.com/node/125999

This has been repeated again in San Francisco, not known to support conservatives or Libertarians anyways, but associated with Ron Paul out there were UFO enthusiasts mentioned in this article:
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2007/08/ron_pauls_ufo_sighter_friends.php

How is it that the kookiest ideas are surrounding Ron Paul?
Ron Paul, UFO disclosure, etc... simply nothing more than a pacifier — a distraction!
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message462483/pg1

Ron Paul supported by anti-war group CODE PINK
http://www.dailypaul.com/165272/anti-war-group-code-pink-counts-ron-paul-in-their-camp-on-israel-aid-opposition
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/18/rep-paul-codepink-camp-israel-aid-opposition/

Ron Paul and his acolytes are following George Soros on the defense of our nation, and connections between the two have been proved
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/

Tehran TV LOVES Ron Paul!
http://www.aim.org/special-report/tehran-tv-loves-ron-paul/

Ron Paul supported by anti-war group CODE PINK
http://www.dailypaul.com/165272/anti-war-group-code-pink-counts-ron-paul-in-their-camp-on-israel-aid-opposition

Glenn Beck exposes Ron Paul’s ties to Soros. Does it shock you, or does it do much to explain why Ron Paul is friendly with “Bawney” Frank and almost as bad as Obama is when it comes to illegal aliens and Islam? Listen to video please.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFSHGhq19CM


27 posted on 05/02/2012 11:11:12 AM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig; All

Wow! JAKraig; everyone needs to read your Post #19. Actually, you need to copy and paste it as a Vanity Post. Good stuff. So refreshing to find a sensible, logically thinking FReeper on here, once in awhile, who is speaking wisdom rather than vitriol.


28 posted on 05/02/2012 11:12:38 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Gerald Ford was an incumbent, like Obama, with a lot of baggage (i.e. he pardoned Nixon) and made serious gaffes in the Debate (i.e. Poland is not under Soviet Bloc control). George H.W. Bush was an incumbent, like Obama, and thought he was a shoo-in even after his biggest misstep of all; breaking the “Read My Lips” pledge. Dole was a crusty old fart, running against a young, popular incumbent President. McCain was a disaster. He would not go after Obama, Romney will. Plus, McCain had a Liberal bitch for a wife and a Liberal bitch for a daughter. He couldn’t run a Conservative campaign to offset “The Chosen One” because he was too “whipped”. But, Obama has a record now. he is greatly hated by people who voted for him and who now feel betrayed; even Blacks and Hispanics. So, put away the broad brush your painting with and lay down the crack pipe and chill out.


29 posted on 05/02/2012 11:38:24 AM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
Dang! A lot of those folks are nuttier than squirrel turds!



Where there's a shell, there's a way.

25 years ago, we had Ronald Reagan, Johnny Cash, and Bob Hope.
Today we have Obama, no cash, and no hope!

If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.

Or you can get raw with these strings.

How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).

And finally, this, dedicated to the one and only rdb2, WHO HAS RETURNED HOME!.

Either way, the violin is sweet yet LETHAL.

Do it!

30 posted on 05/02/2012 3:08:00 PM PDT by rdb3 (If you were tried in court for being a Christian, is there enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007

Keep supporting Willard and you’ll be out the door first newbie...


31 posted on 05/02/2012 5:56:57 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007

Holy wall of stupid batman....

Yes, some times freedom is messy and it allows people to do bad things to themselves.

The alternative is bigger government.

Your choice jackass...


32 posted on 05/02/2012 5:58:33 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Every time the GOP has put a milquetoast on the ticket they gotten their asses handed to them. The one time in the last 30 years they ran a real conservative they won by. A landslide.

Twice.

Learn something from history.

Willard cannot win.


33 posted on 05/02/2012 6:00:57 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: no dems

In Wisconsin, we have a handful of Paul delegates who insinuated themselves into the caucus and will be going to Tampa, provided they can raise the money from others.


34 posted on 05/02/2012 6:01:53 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY
Apr 30, 2012

By Charles Dharapak, AP Before there was the Tea Party movement, there was Texas Rep. Ron Paul and his belief that the federal government should stay out of people's lives.

Next week, the past, present and future of the Tea Party will come together on the steps of the Texas Capitol in Austin.

Paul and his son, Rand, who was elected to the U.S. Senate from Kentucky with Tea Party support, announced today that they will hold a "major" rally May 6 with the Tea Party Express, one of the largest groups in the anti-tax, small-government movement.

The rally will also feature Senate candidate Ted Cruz, who is among the GOP candidates in the Lone Star state seeking the seat of U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison.

Cruz has been described as the Texas version of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, another Tea Party favorite elected in 2010.

35 posted on 05/03/2012 5:59:11 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I don’t support Romney paultard. I was a Cain supporter and then a Newt supporter. I can not bring myself to even believe Paul would be president. He is a disaster and the fact that you are a paultard just tells me all I care to know about you.

It’s a wonder how you’ve kept your FR account being a Paultard.


36 posted on 05/03/2012 9:49:18 AM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse; Jim Robinson

Wall of stupid? That’s the Paultard camp.

Hey Jim. I thought you did away with all the Paultards on here. Looks like you missed one.


37 posted on 05/03/2012 9:56:39 AM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
Actually, I was a Cain supporter. And a Santorum supporter. Then Newt...

Only two left now unless a Third Party can rise to fill the gap.

Paul has NEVER been a candidate of mine. That is why on my original list he ranked one slot above Romney.

Nice try at trolling though newbie.

38 posted on 05/03/2012 11:58:00 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007; Jim Robinson
Yes. Let's look at this. Jim and I have talked about exactly how unelectable Dr. Paul is. Last we discussed this, Jim and I are in complete agreement that whatever good Paul may have tried to do, between his own asshattery and his Troofer sycophant base make him completely unappealing as a candidate.

Until you compare him to a pro-abortion liberal like Romney.

I could vote for Paul on his pro-life stance... I can't vote for Romney period because of his opposite stance. Simple as that.

So, newbie troll, any other aspersions you want to cast?

39 posted on 05/03/2012 12:02:55 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Other than the attack on my lifespan here on FR you can’t say much about my conservative creds. I am a conservative and that means I won’t support Romney. But I won’t support Paul either because he is not a conservative either. There are things I have read that show Paul is not the “pro-lifer” that some here think he is. It has also been shown that Paul is in bed with Soros. I do believe that.

Funny how Paul attacked all the conservatives in the running except for Romney. He seemed to help Romney get this far. I remember reading other posters accounts of things that showed Paul and Romney were in bed together.

I don’t like Romney, but I don’t like Paul either. I won’t waste my vote for either one.

Just so you know, my account may indicate I am new, but it is only because I got zotted for fighting with a few Paulbots and after being stalked by one I lost my temper and got booted.

I can’t stand Romney supporters and I can’t stand Paulbots. Both are anti-conservative as far as I am concerned.

Vote for whoever you wish, it’s your vote, but don’t try to tell me that Paul is anymore conservative than Romney. And both are just the same as Obama. They all dance on the strings controlled by George Soros.


40 posted on 05/03/2012 12:41:09 PM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007; Jim Robinson
So not only are you an admitted retread... After jumping me over pointing out that the last two standing are Paul and Romney...

Now you wanna play nice.

Apparently, you got zotted for a reason.

I don't like Paul. I don't like Romney. I REALLY don't like Zero or any of the other Communists screwing with my Country.

If keeping Paul alive to spoil the brew for Willard will get us a brokered convention and a chance at getting a conservative back on the ticket... Then so be it.

41 posted on 05/03/2012 12:58:59 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Play nice? You’re the one who started calling me names and you want me to feel bad for thinking you’re a paultard because you were attacking me for voicing opposition to Paul?

You’re smoking too much of that Paul dope.

I would love a brokered convention but I somehow doubt it will happen. Regardless of Paul or anyone.

In my memory I can’t remember a worse election year with no choices at all left for us to make.

If the choices are Paul, Romney and Obama then I choose NONE OF THE ABOVE. I’ll write in Palin or Newt.

I plan on voting in as many conservatives to the house and senate and local offices as possible and hope it slows down the bleeding of our rights, but at this point in time I hold out no hope at all for any of the remaining presidential candidates.


42 posted on 05/03/2012 1:18:45 PM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

By the way, your first post to me was attacking me for you believing that I was a Romney supporter. In that post you favored Paul so that gave me every right to believe you are a paul supporter. You assumed that I was a Romneybot but you came off like a Paulbot.

That makes you a jackass?


43 posted on 05/03/2012 1:24:28 PM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
Actually, I didn't call you any names.

You stated this:

I would vote for Romney or Obama before I would vote for Paul.

This says you would vote for ROMNEY over Paul or Zero.

My first post on this thread never mentioned Paul. Neither did my second.

It was only after that you started in with the "Paultard" pejoratives.

44 posted on 05/03/2012 1:39:53 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
I would vote for Romney or Obama before I would vote for Paul.

"By the way, your first post to me was attacking me for you believing that I was a Romney supporter. "

Gee... Where would I have gotten that idea? You'd openly vote for a pro-abort gun hating RINO over an Ob-Gyn who still practices and has never performed an abortion nor voted to approve funding for abortion mills.

Nope. You are still pretty much a jackass.

45 posted on 05/03/2012 1:42:52 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson