Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Hoefling: "Mitt Romney is still a pro-choice democrat, and admits it on his own website"
Tom Hoefling for President 2012 ^ | May 2, 2012 | Tom Hoefling

Posted on 05/02/2012 11:22:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

Mitt Romney: Judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.

Here's the proof.

Listen to the eight minute audio HERE .

*Excerpted from May 1, 2012 America's Summit, Restore the Republic call


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: democrats; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last
To: HwyChile
If you like abortionist, homosexualist, gun-control-freak, big government socialist authors of communist health-care plans, go vote for r0mney (that's exactly what he is) and get off this forum. You stink like a fascist. (That's another good description of r0mney.)

You disgust me, n00b.

41 posted on 05/02/2012 12:27:37 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I approve your message. Down with Romney!

42 posted on 05/02/2012 12:28:31 PM PDT by tnlibertarian (I <3 PEJSWDTDSOPC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I’ve been fighting against Obama since before most folks ever heard of him.

And I’m not worried about Virgil Goode.


43 posted on 05/02/2012 12:29:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
part of the reason for that is that he just couldn't overcome the opposition

That's the whole reason. I'm just excerpting the factual part.

When you lose an election, the cheapest response is to blame the party, second cheapest, blame the voters. You seem to be combining the two.

44 posted on 05/02/2012 12:29:30 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Well go vote for Obama then if you are so conservative that you cannot vote for the only other candidate who will be running against Obama. What do you propose we do? Should we just all stay home and let Obama win? LOL. Are you really that dumb.
45 posted on 05/02/2012 12:29:35 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile; EternalVigilance; TheOldLady
If you don't like Romeny, go vote for Obama and get off this board.

Seriously? You just told EV to "get off this board" because EV doesn't like Romney.

Seriously?

46 posted on 05/02/2012 12:29:50 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

This is a conservative site..not a Republican site...Romney is not conservative....sounds like you need to be on a Republican site where you can push Romney all you want. You know you will be met with resistance here.

As the owner has stated...”We are the Resistance”. ...FR does not vote for socialists.


47 posted on 05/02/2012 12:30:05 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tnlibertarian

I note that you have stipulated to the fact that Mitt Romney is a judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.


48 posted on 05/02/2012 12:30:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I’ve been fighting against Obama

Be nice to see that again in some of your threads.

And I’m not worried about Virgil Goode.

Why not?

49 posted on 05/02/2012 12:31:08 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
We all know that you are a liberal democrat trying to stir the pot against Romeny in hopes that people won't vote for him so that your guy, Obama, will win. We aren't that dumb. Nice try though.
50 posted on 05/02/2012 12:32:53 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile
the only other candidate who will be running against Obama.

Romney Republican lie number one.

stay home and let Obama win? LOL.

Romney Republican lie number two.

Are you really that dumb.

How Romney Republicans view principled conservatives.

51 posted on 05/02/2012 12:33:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I notice you haven’t denied that Mitt Romney is a pro-choice democrat.

Are you stipulating to that as well?


52 posted on 05/02/2012 12:34:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Principled conservatives have one trait that liberals don't have: They live in reality, and the reality is that either Obama or Romeny is going to win, so you either get behind Romeny or Obama will win. I know you are not that dumb, so that only leaves one other explanation. You are a liberal democrat.
53 posted on 05/02/2012 12:35:53 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I am stipulating that the primary mission in this election is to remove the current regime from power.

Would you agree?


54 posted on 05/02/2012 12:38:42 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
part of the reason for that is that he just couldn't overcome the opposition of those who have now become Romney Republicans.

...And this time around neither could Newt ,Bachman, Cain, Santorum, and all the rest. The GOP had this locked long ago.

55 posted on 05/02/2012 12:39:36 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

It’s becoming apparent you’re not familiar with the concept of principle.

The perfect Romney Republican.


56 posted on 05/02/2012 12:43:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The Obama/Romney math: 0+0=0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; HwyChile

Acting on principles requires serious consideration of the results of one’s action. I don’t see your actions as principled or moral, because the results are greater harm to the republic.

There is not even a scintilla of reasonable judgement that actions that support the regime’s election goals will do anything but further the regime’s power.


57 posted on 05/02/2012 12:43:46 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile

[ Should we just all stay home and let Obama win? ]

Obama is proper punishment for murdering our babies.. and other things..
Could be the punishment is not over yet..

Looks like it too.. running Romney vs. Obama..
He(willard) will take a “dive” exactly like McLame did..
This Kubuki Theater of an election is all drama..
Much like the last one.. and the one before that..

The republican party seems to be NOT like Lott.. but like Lott’s WIFE..
Cause surely America has become the New Sodom..
Only thing remaining is “the SALT”.. i.e. the fix is in.. Zero will win again.


58 posted on 05/02/2012 12:45:45 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile
Well go vote for Obama then if you are so conservative that you cannot vote for the only other candidate who will be running against Obama. What do you propose we do? Should we just all stay home and let Obama win? LOL. Are you really that dumb.

Hey, noob! You DO realize you are also insulting the owner of FreeRepublic, don't you? Maybe you should read this book before you get yourself into even MORE trouble:


59 posted on 05/02/2012 12:47:12 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: caww
The GOP had this locked long ago.

The primary consisted of candidates, campaigns, voters and elections. It was a weak field and the notRomney opposition failed to unite around one candidate.

Blaming the party is nonsense. Supporting an even weaker candidate with even less unity does nothing to fix the problem, is a nonsensical, perhaps feel good, exercise.

60 posted on 05/02/2012 12:47:24 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson