Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pastor Youcef’s Attorney to be Jailed for Representing the Persecuted
ACLJ ^ | 5/3/2012 | By Jordan Sekulo

Posted on 05/03/2012 7:16:32 PM PDT by blueyon

Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani’s Iranian attorney has been convicted for his work defending human rights and is expected to have to begin serving his nine-year sentence in the near future.

As we have previously reported, Pastor Youcef’s attorney, Mohammad Ali Dadkhah, was sentenced to nine years in prison and banned from practicing law or teaching for ten years by the Iranian government, essentially for representing individuals like Pastor Youcef.

Dadkhah recently stated, “I was in a court in Tehran defending one of my clients, Davoud Arjangi, a jailed political activist on death row when the judge told me that my own sentence has been approved and I will be shortly summoned to jail to serve the nine-year sentence.” He continued, “I have been convicted of acting against the national security, spreading propaganda against the regime and keeping banned books at home.”

(Excerpt) Read more at aclj.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beheading; iran; obama; youcef
Please pray that God protects them
1 posted on 05/03/2012 7:16:37 PM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This is the kind of DOJ that Eric Holder longs for.


2 posted on 05/03/2012 7:19:15 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Pretty sure they off’d Marie Antoinette’s lawyer as well.


3 posted on 05/03/2012 7:28:38 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
This is what happens when a government is allowed to put "public policy" and "public interest" ahead of individual rights. Check U.S. court cases, including SCOTUS, over the last fifty years. In three years of reading tons of court cases at law school, I don't think I once saw "individual rights" or "individual interests" as a reason for any decision made after, say, 1935.

The reasoning (which becomes "case law") is always "societal" or "public" interests, rights, and concerns which is a semi-veiled way of saying government interests and concerns. Government interests and concerns, outside of a narrow and limited scope as reflected in the U.S. Constitution, are almost always in opposition to individual freedoms and unalienable rights.

So what you have is a solid fifty years of U.S. case law that has replaced the value of individual liberties, interests, and rights with governmental interests. The only legal restraint to the otherwise unabated erosion of the value of individual liberties and rights in our country is the U.S. Constitution which itself is under relentless attack.

4 posted on 05/04/2012 6:04:12 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson