Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Argentina's Congress votes for YPF nationalisation
The Telegraph ^ | 5/4/2012 | Jonathan Gilbert, in Buenos Aires

Posted on 05/04/2012 4:02:16 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

Argentina has approved the expropriation of YPF, the country’s biggest oil company, from Spanish energy giant Repsol amid scenes of raucous jubilation inside and outside Congress.

Following two days of debate, the Chamber of Deputies passed the nationalisation bill with a majority of 208 votes – 81 per cent of the house – after the Senate had paved the way for approval last week by also voting in favour. In both houses, the bill was backed by the overwhelming majority of opposition parties.

Cristina Kirchner, the Argentine president, who had announced her decision to nationalise a little more than two weeks ago, will tonight declare the immediate enactment of the law, which expropriates 51 per cent of Repsol’s shares in the company.

Tens of thousands of militants gathered outside Congress to celebrate the repatriation of YPF, which had been privatised in 1992, letting off fireworks as vice-president Amado Boudou danced and chanted in front of the crowds.

Hundreds were also allowed inside the chamber. Together with politicians, the majority of whom wore YPF badges, they sang in support of Mrs Kirchner and draped a giant banner of Néstor Kirchner, her late husband and predecessor – who led Argentina away from its neoliberal model of the 1990s – from the upper balconies of the chamber.

In a final, passionate address, Agustín Rossi, who leads Mrs Kirchner’s Front for Victory block in the chamber, said the Argentine government does not “fear the power of corporations”, insisting that the repatriation of YPF will reverse Respol’s alleged lack of investment in energy production and

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: argentina; fascists; peronists

1 posted on 05/04/2012 4:02:24 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

How soon will the lights start going out in Argentina?


2 posted on 05/04/2012 4:07:49 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Post office will run oil company??

Gooood luck and bye bye! See you in gas rationing lines!


3 posted on 05/04/2012 4:10:50 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; Truth29

The country is economically falling apart already, the socialists don’t give a crap about the day to day life of real people.


4 posted on 05/04/2012 4:18:31 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Thieves. They don't intend to compensate the present owners at all.

...billions of dollars are required to develop Argentina’s prospects including at least €25bn a year over the next decade to exploit the Vaca Muerta shale discovery made last year.
Julio De Vido, Argentina’s Planning Minister has already approached Brazil's state-run oil company Pertobras over investment in YPF and plans to contact other foreign oil companies including Exxon, Chevron and ConocoPhilips.
The development comes amid yet more rhetoric from Argentina as government sources insisted the offer of compensation would be “zero pesos”.

They want companies to invest billions when they have just stolen $10 billion from the last company to invest.

And they roughed up the Spanish employees, just to make their point I suppose.

Meanwhile, details of the aggressive tactics employed by the government of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner towards Spanish executives at YPF during the takeover emerged in a briefing issued by Spain’s foreign office to all its embassies fermenting hostilities between the two countries.
Mr de Vido and Axel Kicillof, the deputy economy minister, arrived at company headquarters with armed security guards who used “physical violence and threats” to force Spanish YPF employees from the building giving them five minutes to collect their personal belongings, the internal memo said.
Spanish YPF executives were then “hunted down” for “harsh interrogation” and they and their families sought refuge at the home of a senior executive awaiting repatriation to Spain.

They handed the company over to one of their own, who was caught bringing in campaign money from Hugo Chavez a few years ago.

Thieves. In the end they'll find they haven't got anything. The golden goose doesn't have golden eggs, you have to invest to make them.

Note, though, that Argentina's oil is oil shale. This action may have torpedoed efforts to develop their oil shale. Maybe there is another game being played other than the obvious one. Who is going to invest in their oil shale now?

5 posted on 05/04/2012 4:43:16 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Hussein supports the Maldives (he meant to say Malvinas, what Britain calls the Falklands), so perhaps Argentina has some assurances from the Fraud.


6 posted on 05/04/2012 4:43:25 PM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I forgot to include the link to my post 5.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/9221326/Argentine-government-to-pay-Repsol-zero-pesos-for-YPF-seizure-as-Spanish-oil-company-issues-legal-warning.html


7 posted on 05/04/2012 4:45:39 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I wonder if in the end they’ll have to go to China for investment capital... what they seized may be in effect sold to China. Just wondering.


8 posted on 05/04/2012 4:47:34 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Spain needs to step up and not talk softly as they have been doing. The need to seize Argentinian assets within Spain's reach and the Spanish navy could start “safety” inspections of Argentinian vessels that approach EU ports or wherever else they can find a rationale.
9 posted on 05/04/2012 4:56:49 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

If I were the British, I would re-enforce the Falkland Islands. The Peronist fascists are getting greedy and desperate.


10 posted on 05/04/2012 5:18:19 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

“Don’t make us come down there and kick your ass again.”


11 posted on 05/04/2012 5:19:41 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
“Don’t make us come down there and kick your ass again.”
Britain could not retake the Falklands today as they could in 1982. The 1982 task force included 2 Carriers: HMS Hermes and HMS Invincible with 28 Sea Harriers between them
2 Landing Platform Docks
8 anti-aircraft destroyers (1 Type 82, 5 Type 42, and 2 obsolete County Class Destroyers
15 Frigates: 2 Type 22 Frigates and the rest obsolete types.
6 Submarines

Today, HMS Hermes is Indian. The United Kingdom has retired its Sea Harriers (or sold them to India). It surviving Invincible Class carrier, HMS Illustrious is now a helicopter carrier with no capability to project power or defend a fleet.
The entire Royal Navy only has 13 Type 23 Frigates, 4 Type 45 Destroyers, and 2 improved Type 42 Destroyers.
One Type 45 Destroyer, HMS Dauntless protects the Falklands, along with 8 or 12 Eurofighter Typhoons. If the single destroyer and handful of tiffies don't prevent an Argentinian landing, the British cannot retake the islands without the assistance of NATO nations.

12 posted on 05/04/2012 6:11:04 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Geez the Daunless is an ugly ship. Nothing like the lines of a WWII US tin can.


13 posted on 05/04/2012 6:57:18 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
Geez the Daunless is an ugly ship. Nothing like the lines of a WWII US tin can.
HMS Hood had much nicer lines than the similarly armed Bismarck. Function trumps beauty. Furthermore the Type 42 Destroyers were no pieces of art. The Daring Class are called destroyers, but in function they are far closer to the Dido Class cruisers, whose size they more closely approximate.
The Sampson radar on the pyramidal structure is supposed to give the Type 45 better detection of sea skimming missiles than the SPY-1B and D radar in our destroyers and cruisers. In fact, most other countries are now placing their radars higher because of this. This includes the SPY1-D in the new Spanish and proposed Australian destroyers, and the SPY-1F in the Norwegian frigates.
14 posted on 05/04/2012 7:32:08 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson