that’s because the government “levels the playing field” for all women. According to the helpless twits, things are “unfair” and everyone “has it in for them” and will never give them a “fair shake” because of the patriarchal nature of western civilization.
Oh, if she’d keep her panties up, she might be taken more seriously, but that is way too much to ask. Because as you have been informed by the geniuses in Hollywood, people have a right to an exciting sex life, whether they are married or not.
Eat your heart out, Sandra Fluke. Julia gets free birth control pills
No husband. One child at 31. Has her own business but still needs to have Medicare and Social Security for retirement. Yes that sounds like Zero’s Marxist utopia.
Goebbels would be proud.
Not sure where they would go with that--they don't want to offend their feminist base by having a sympathetic male character. They could do one about a male who games the system (government worker in a union, or someone with a fake disability, or a member of a protected class) but they don't want the general public to know more about that than they already do.
Maybe the RNC could use the Winston name to do something to counter the Julia one, but they probably aren't clever enough to do so.
The irony is that there are already millions of real-life Julias out there soaking up the national wealth.
Obama did not invent them, every president of both parties enabled them, or thought it not important enough to oppose profligate congresses. Obama just made sure that there are several times the number that existed prior to his election.
Wouldn't it be useful to determine how many Julias and Julios already exist? And I'm sure they all vote.
The Liberal Messiah believes all single women think of the federal government as their husband and so He expects those women to vote for their provider. I hope single women see through His paternalistic, condescending, sexist attitude.
I am sure I am way behind the curve, but this is so ripe for mocking.
Like the 3 year old slide:
Under Obama Julia was born with $50,000 in debt and must start paying a fine if she doesn’t buy health insurance just for the privilege of breathing......
At 67: Under Obama Julia was diagnosed with cancer. Obama’s plans to make our health care like Europe’s means lower survival rates, but Julia is happy to help “bend the curve” and not waste precious resources trying to live. Since she aborted her children for free in her 20’s there is no one to visit her in the the Obama funded old person warehouse....
Unbelievably demeaning. We’ve lost our understanding of freedom and responsibility.
How sad that this horrible stuff even has the potential to generate votes.
Hussein's old girlfriend?
As a woman, I’m offended by the notion that a woman’s place is living out her life “UNDER” anyone.
Under Obama? Under Romney?
Here’s the real Julia”
the website follows a hypothetical character from age 3 to 67
Missing those pesky endpoints. Will "Julia" survive a failed abortion? "Julia and the 0-Care Death Panel".
But she doesn't have to marry a man and have kids to be "fulfilled" ..... she can lead a life of government-supported fun, and have fun clothes (from Ross's Dress for Less), and travel, and friends (girls of course), and kittens, and no yard to mow, and free minutes on her Obamaphone having kicky, fun conversations with her friends (girls, of course), and help with the rent, and Obama gasoline for her fun little Obama car .... all on the government nickel, helped out of course by whatever she can make answering phones for the next 50 years. (It'll be 50, dear -- sorry, that's the new retirement math. Sorry, again.)