Skip to comments.Panetta Beats War Drums on Climate Change
Posted on 05/06/2012 6:33:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
Global warming has been off the energy-news radar as high gas prices have usurped the spotlighthowever Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has brought it back. Defense Secretary? you might ask. Not Energy Secretary Steven Chu or EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson?
No. It was Leon Panetta, who, at an Environmental Defense Fund reception on Thursday May 3, declared The area of climate change has a dramatic impact on national security. (Are we going to declare war on countries like Canada for backing out of the Kyoto climate change commitments, or China and India for never supporting them in the first place?)
Panettas comments tell us two things. First, as Ive stated in a previous column, the environmental community is important to the presidents re-election efforts, and, second, global warming will be part of the debate in the coming months leading up to November.
President Obama campaigned with the promise that he would slow the rise of the oceans and enact cap-and-trade legislation. Talk of manmade climate change was central to his election efforts. Now we know it will still be a part of the re-election rhetoric.
Likewise, candidate Romney has also supported the theory of manmade climate change and was part of the founding of one of the original cap-and-trade programs. However, Romney has now, after seeing new data, admitted that he doesnt know whether or not mans activity plays a role in climate change.
Both President Obama and Governor Romney accepted what was the prevalent thinking on climate change at the time. Many believed that the science was settled. Scientists like NASAs James Hansen and Penn States Michael Mann publicly proclaimed that global warming was a threat to all of humanity and the earth. But that was then. Leon Panettas comment reminds us that the Obama position on climate change has remained static, while Romneys has matured with the latest findings.
Within the past few weeks, James Lovelock, a scientist and climate-change alarmist, who in 2006 wrote, Before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable, admitted he was wrong and acknowledges that hed been extrapolating too far.
Lovelock puts himself in the same alarmist category as Al Gore. Now he sees that the problem is we dont know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist booksmine includedbecause it looked clear-cut, but it hasnt happened. Lovelock continues. The climate is doing its usual tricks. Theres nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now. The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been risingcarbon dioxide is rising, no question about that. Despite rising carbon dioxide, sea levels are droppingthough it is doubtful that President Obama can take any credit for it since his promised cap-and-trade plan did not make it through the Democratic controlled Congress.
As Lovelock confessed, the dire predictions havent come true.
The polar bear, the mascot of the climate change crisis, believed to be drowning due to melting ice caps, is flourishing. Drikus Gissing, director of wildlife management for the Nunavut region, told the Globe and Mail, The bear population is not in crisis as people believed. There is no doom and gloom. The Canadian study Gissing referenced found that the polar bear population was 66 percent higher than expected.
The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted in 2007 that Glaciers in the Himalayas are receding faster than in any other part of the world and if the present rate continues, the likelihood of their disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate. Then, in 2010, they had to retract the estimate, admitting that it was based on dubious scientific sources. Time Magazine called the entire episode a black eye for the IPCC and for the climate-science community as a whole. Now, there is a new study reported in Nature that points out that the contribution of melting ice is much less than previously estimated, with the lack of ice loss in the Himalayas and the other high peaks of Asia responsible for most of the discrepancy.
As the Himalayan story exposes, some of the science behind the manmade climate change hysteria is dubious. And some is the result of scientific misconduct, as was revealed in the Climategate scandal that exposed falsified records and silenced scientists.
Add to the above the impact the general public is beginning to feel as climate change mitigation strategiessuch as wind and solar powerare hitting their utility bills, and the disgust they feel over the presidents insistence that more taxpayer dollars be thrown at an increasing number of failing so-called renewable energy firms, and it is easy to see why support for manmade global warming theory has waned.
And, one has to question why the president is entrenched in ideology that has now been shown to be demonstrably deceptive. The issue of costly climate change mitigation schemes is about more than just our presidential candidates. More than half of the states have mandated requirements for expensive renewable energy that raises electricity rates for everyone. Each legislator who voted for the cost-increasing standards needs to be as honest as Romney, and admit that they were wrong and reverse the policies, or be voted out of office. Unless that happens, energy prices will continue to climb and will stunt the struggling economic recovery.
The combination of new data, dire predictions that were no more accurate than a carnival fortune teller, scientific misconduct, and harsh economic impacts dont add up to a strong foundation for a presidential campaignyet, as Leon Panetta exposed, President Obama continues to cling to claims of manmade climate change crisis while Romney, like former alarmist James Lovelock, admits he was wrong.
Thousands of scientists never believed the predictions put forth by computer models, and many more, like Lovelock, have begun to question the assumptions. Later this month, hundreds of them, from across the globe, will converge in Chicago for the worlds largest gathering of skeptics. There they will discuss and debate the science.
Over the next six months, we are bound to hear about climate change as an issue. Romney will likely be called a flip-flopper, while President Obama stands firm on his convictionswith one sounding shameful and the other honorable. In contrast, I believe it is honorable to accept new input and admit when we are wrong and shameful to ignore new evidence, putting ideology ahead of reality.
I'm waiting for Mr. Swivelhead to jump in with a severely conservative reason why we must break out our wallets for this sham of global warming.
Oh, I'm sorry, "climate change", after all we destroyed the planet with global cooling back in the '70's.
Arctic sea ice photos (satellite)
Our government is at war with us. Unfortunately, not enough of us realize this and that leaves us defenseless.
We fight the enemies we think we can handle.
"However, Romney has now, after seeing new data, admitted that he doesnt know whether or not mans activity plays a role in climate change."
Some progress. That's more that we got out of McCain.
Isn’t Lyin’ Pendejo the SecDef who insists that US troops be disarmed in his presence?
Romney will say whatever he needs to say to get elected. The trick is determining if he was pandering then or pandering now. We may never know.
Better that he panders to The Right on this issue rather than The Left as McCain did. All politicians pander. That's their job description.
The same Leon Panetta that has it in his contract that he flies home to California every weekend?
I can see why they want to remove the word Lunatic ,the Obama Admin is full of lunatics
Indeed. A perfect example of the Dem Philosophy of "Do as I say, not as I do."
Dear Panetta, stick to your knitting, and tell your idiot boss to shove it up his ass. C’mon, we know you have it in you.
This is very sad. Panetta is the shining light in the criminal Obama administration. He enters prostitution with this statement.
Maybe he is after a Research grant also.
You can't handle the truth, Leon!
Leon was brought on board for specific reasons in mind. We are seeing who he holds allegiance to slowly coming out.
Well, that's big business for these climate scammers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.