Skip to comments.Are you an ABO like me PO'd at JR for getting called a RINO? Truce declared! Please DONATE!
Posted on 05/06/2012 8:09:35 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
Attention "Anyone But Obama" (ABO) FReepers! If you go to the thread at the link you will will see that JimRob has "declared a truce" and hundreds of ABO FReepers are now vigorously defending their belief, which I share, that the ineligible Marxist Manchurian MUST BE DEFEATED to preserve the Republic...without fear of "the ZOT"! Please consider a DONATION not just to fund renewal of expression and amplification of your ABO views, but let's over-achieve this FReepathon to get JR his new equipment!
IMO, Free Republic and FReepers could be vital in swing states in rallying just enough conservatives to tip the election and prevent our troops from having to salute for even one day longer than necessary an ineligible Marxist committed to destroying the USA !
You forgot to ping him...
And I have yet to see a single post from you that states what you believe, just hate spewing forth from you. Hmmm...motes and beams.
You got that right. I used to be a monthly donor. The wolf pack that gets summoned do a disservice to this site that was once my #1 site out of the millions on the internet.
Now, unless something is changed it will continue to devolve into a cartoon of its once former great self.
Now, I stop by the site to see how many of Freepers preach 0bama since Romeny is even worse. It'd be funny is it wasn't so comical.
“How about a truce involving the religious bigots that inhabit this site.”
Personally, I’d rather see a truce on the cat-picture threads before the Catholic Jesus vs. Protestant Jesus smack-down threads.
It would have been much less awkward to not ban people for expressing political opinions that weren’t “Newt” but I guess that’s water under the bridge.
Yeah, so let’s just ban cat pictures, and move on with conservative political debate, or at least advocate “Who’s the least Marxist” as a political movement this cycle.
Logically, there can be no way of determining if there are absolutes or not. That determination is an opinion, not a fact.
Even science has a philosophical base and is taken on faith.
There's more than one group kicking up the dust here!
A thing cant be demonized that already demonizes itself.
Based on that post.
Will Jews go to heaven?
Can discussion of Mitt’s running be separated from his religion?
Whoever labeled you a satanist for believing in souls being reincarnated, IMO, is not correct. Satanists do not believe in reincarnation. They know people only get one life. And then they go down to hell to wait for their master Satan.
The reincarnation belief though, is not a biblical belief, and that I will tell you as one Christian from another. You only get one life, and after that, the judgment. There are no second chances and no do-overs. That is eastern mysticism, not biblical Christianity. The examples of Jesus raising people from the dead to live awhile longer temporally is not evidence of reincarnation.
Your other belief that animals have souls, IS biblically based and is correct. There are great books that discuss this topic from a biblical standpoint and reading other parts of Scripture understanding God’s initial creation and His plans for restoration in the future, there is no doubt in my mind animals have spirits and they will enjoy restoration and eternal life as God originally intended. I can let you know the books if you want, just PM me.
Well, I’m not a Christian, but I will proudly admit that the United States was built on Christian values.
I’m Jewish, but I have nothing but love in my heart for my Catholic and Protestant brothers and sisters. Nothing annoys me more when liberal “Jews” (an oxymoron to be sure-—One cannot be a Jew and a liberal. That’s like being a capitalist communist.) and their friends at the ACLU attack small towns for having a Manger Scene on the steps of their town hall. It’s like, dare I say it, being a member of the Jewish Police in the Warsaw Ghetto. The way liberals persecute Christians is far too much like the way the Nazis persecuted the Jews. I won’t stand for it.
That bears repeating.
Also a consideration that I have seen brought up is the SCOTUS. Speculation is that if obama is in, the current conservative justices won't resign, where they might if a republican is in the White House.
I agree with your assessment of Romney and what will happen if he's in and I also don't trust him in the area of the SCOTUS. I think he'll put in liberals as fast as obama.
I heard someone today call Romney *obamney* and I think he's right.
I didn’t need to, you did!
Santorum clearly pointed out many times that Romney wrote Planned Parenthood into Romneycare and that every conservative knows that if anti-abortion language isn’t written into a health care law, the courts state that it must be covered. Romney knew that too.
The entire GOP establishment is leaning toward facilitating same-sex marriage, not just Romney. That’s why we need to push back and elect candidates who are firmly against it. Make no mistake, Romney’s friendliness toward same-sex marriage is one of the reasons he has had the backing from the establishment that he has. This article has more on Romney’s record on same-sex marriage.
As a gay-marriage proponent, I was pleased to learn that then-Gov. Willard Mitt Romney, R-Mass., issued at least 189 special-issue, one-day marriage licenses to same-sex couples in 2005 alone. These documents let these 378 people enjoy nuptials officiated by relatives, friends, and others who normally do not perform weddings.
Romney enforced the court’s opinion, even though it required nothing of him, having allowed the legislature a window to act “as it may deem appropriate.”
While Team Romney argues that the court forced it to give gay couples conventional marriage licenses, the special one-day licenses are a strictly gubernatorial choice, as Massachusetts law unambiguously states.
“Even if one accepts the Goodridge decision as constitutional, the one-day permits were above and beyond what was required by the court decision; they were purely discretionary,”
Fans of gay marriage should thank Romney for these 189 or more instances in which he voluntarily used his gubernatorial authority to unite these same-sex couples so they might live happily ever after.
Foes of gay matrimony should ask Romney if he really meant it when he said, “I have never supported same-sex marriage.” If so, why did he use his discretionary power to do just that at least 189 times?
This is a real dispute in Christianity though since so many people who are heirs to the Eastern Concept brought it with them into Christianity.
Some accept the idea's Biblical legitimacy by noting the "Dead in Christ' who rise up in Revelation to ask questions or to give hosannas.
Jesus himself rose from the dead.
There's certainly plenty of room for debate within the pale of Christian belief ~ but on the day to day plain it's not a big issue.
I think some confound satanism or devil worship with the other concepts in the East regarding the Demon Realm. I know Protestants have always gone hammer and tong after the Catholics over the "descended into Hell" business and over the centuries viewpoints on both sides of that particular coin have adjusted ~ and you rarely hear that issue raised anymore.
I'm trying to avoid being nonjudgmental. I have my own beliefs on these matters and they're pretty conventional. But you're not a satan worshipper for believing a soul might descend into Hell.
As I've stated several times right here some politicians, Nancy Pelosi is an example, have probably done enough evil they'll go straight to Hell ~ no purgatory ~ non stop ~ does not pass Go. Some suggest she can reform in the here and now but i doubt she can reform ~ none of us can tell if her reformation would count though.
Nope. There are Jews who believe that Jesus is who He said He was. They'll make it.
What you need to realize is that it's not religion that saves, it's Jesus. It doesn't matter which religion you belong to if you have truly put your trust in Him to save you.
There are saved and unsaved in every religion.
So you admit you’re voting for obama.
I am not going to argue religion with you about what is right are wrong, that is exactly the reason for my initial post on this thread, so quit preaching!
I feel the same way. I just don’t know what to do-—Down here in Sunny Florida, you can’t abstain on any part of the ballot. You have to vote for someone, and I’m not real clear on the write-in rules. I certainly don’t want to miss my chance to send that commie pig Bill Nelson packing.
This sucks. I hate being put in this situation.
Not the way FR is going there's not.
Um, I wasn't arguing anything. I just told eastforker that he wouldn't be able to win the debate he seemed to be embarked on. I wasn't involved in any discussion of baptism, drowned babies, or anything else. All I said was most people understand what a person means when they say religion is based on faith and is not something that can be definitively proven, but some people do not accept that such a statement applies to their religion.
I was referring to your response to him about my post.
You are such a crank, and I mean that in the most negative way possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.