Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chutzpah: Women at 9/11 trial Should Cover up Out of Respect for Terrorists
TLJ News ^ | 05/06/2012 | staff

Posted on 05/07/2012 5:34:36 AM PDT by safetysign

A female defense attorney, who is not Muslim, wore the traditional Islamic hijab to the military court staging the trial of five Guantanamo Bay prisoners accused of the September 11 attacks yesterday.

Cheryl Bormann, 52, who represents Walid bin Attash, said that her client had demanded she wear the clothing and insisted that other women at the hearing also wear ‘appropriate’ clothes out of respect for his religion.

Today she explained her decision at Guantanamo Bay, saying she always wears the hijab around her client.

She asked that other women follow her example so that the defendants do not have to avert their eyes ‘for fear of committing a sin under their faith’, according to Fox News.

The lawyer’s decision was one of the less controversial moments during Saturday’s hearing where at times the accused openly defied the court.

Defense: Cheryl Bormann appeared in court wearing traditional Islamic dress out of respect for her client Walid bin Attash Self-proclaimed ‘mastermind’ Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, wearing a turban and white tunic, refused to answer the judge’s questions.

Mohammed had been asked if he was satisfied with his U.S. military and civilian lawyers.

‘I believe he’s deeply concerned about the fairness of the proceeding,’ said his civilian lawyer, David Nevin.

Proceedings were further delayed as one of the defendants, Waleed bin Attash, appeared while being restrained in his chair.

The restraints were later removed after defense counsel had given assurances that he would ‘behave’.

Another defendant, Ramzi Binalshibh, stood up, then knelt on the courtroom floor and prayed for several minutes as a row of guards in camouflage uniforms kept a close watch.

Mohammed and his co-defendants could all face the death penalty.

They have been accused of seven charges stemming from the 2001 attacks that killed 2,976 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

The devastation resulted in the U.S. embarking on a deadly, costly and ongoing global war against al Qaeda and its supporters.

The families of six victims killed in the attacks were at court witnessing the trial while other victims’ families were able to watch proceedings via close-circuit TV.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ksm; lawyer; leftist; muslim
On the contrary, women should be scantily garbed to show no repect for these muslim pieces of shi*
1 posted on 05/07/2012 5:34:36 AM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: safetysign

I love the “He doesn’t want to risk committing a sin”.


2 posted on 05/07/2012 5:38:08 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

they should make them sit on chairs made of pig leather!


3 posted on 05/07/2012 5:39:12 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Why is “Cheryl’s” husband father brother or uncle not there to chaperone and speak for her, since her clients’ “religion” does not permit him to talk with her?


4 posted on 05/07/2012 5:41:32 AM PDT by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
We wouldn't want to offend their faith.

How about they cut their own throat so as not to offend ours!!!!

5 posted on 05/07/2012 5:41:55 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Cheryl Bormann, 52, who represents Walid bin Attash, said that her client had demanded she wear the clothing and insisted that other women at the hearing also wear ‘appropriate’ clothes out of respect for his religion.

If Ms Bormann wants to appear in the clothes of a slave that's her business. Of course she wants others to do the same, and to hell with that.

6 posted on 05/07/2012 5:49:02 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Squirt sulphuric acid into the muzzies’ eyes; problem solved.


7 posted on 05/07/2012 5:51:35 AM PDT by carriage_hill (((.)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Just one of many tactics that will convert this trial into a circus. Nobody will get convicted, at least not for 5 years or so.


8 posted on 05/07/2012 5:56:38 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign; All

Were the LV hookers -whom Muhammad Atta had SEX with- “covered?”


9 posted on 05/07/2012 5:57:21 AM PDT by Milagros (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Sometimes a person gets the urge to take these pieces of trash and start kicking their rearends so hard they can’t sit down for a year. Islamism is so mindbogglingly insane you don’t know where to begin.


10 posted on 05/07/2012 6:00:48 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Blindfold the freaking muzzies and just have the women wear appropriate attire for a US court.


11 posted on 05/07/2012 6:01:50 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

I was surprised a female creaturette was allowed to represent a male creature.

She can wear anything she wants or go nude (yeck!), but don’t tell the rest, who are women, what to wear and what not to wear.


12 posted on 05/07/2012 6:05:12 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

IMHO, when convicted, these muslim turds should face an all female firing squad, wearing swimsuits.


13 posted on 05/07/2012 6:10:50 AM PDT by Tahoe3002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
The women in the court trial should be butt naked, eating pork rinds and bacon.
14 posted on 05/07/2012 6:18:59 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baddog 219

In the court trial?


15 posted on 05/07/2012 6:23:03 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Does anyone know the make-up of the jury? There was a rumor that no Jews would be allowed on it.


16 posted on 05/07/2012 6:38:04 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tahoe3002

I volunteer to do it naked and in high heels.


17 posted on 05/07/2012 6:41:02 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
“...said that her client had demanded she wear the clothing”

At this point, I would be closing my briefcase and telling the guy “you are so done. Get yourself a new attorney or represent yourself.”

18 posted on 05/07/2012 6:42:40 AM PDT by hummingbird (I am Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

I assume we taxpayers are paying these lawyers.


19 posted on 05/07/2012 6:49:21 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
My guess is that Cheryl's appearance is greatly improved by wearing a burka. Does anyone have pictures?
20 posted on 05/07/2012 7:09:13 AM PDT by GrannyAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Is Washington, DC-based attorney Cheryl Bormann one of those self-hating Jews that feel compelled to defend Muslim murderers? (I don't have any idea about her religion, but it would be incredible if this is the case.)

In any case, this woman attorney is a total flake in the mold of now deceased Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie. What alternative universe does she inhabit?

21 posted on 05/07/2012 7:10:05 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Your fellow FReepers would love for you to audition!

But seriously, just what is it about Islam that teaches men to fear & loathe the beauty of woman? Any answers out there?


22 posted on 05/07/2012 7:14:02 AM PDT by elcid1970 (Nuke Mecca now. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

there’s a call for a bikini protest outside of a mosque if ever I’ve heard one...


23 posted on 05/07/2012 7:25:29 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

I’d suggest everyone enjoy a BLT lunch and pulled pork buffet before the hangin’.


24 posted on 05/07/2012 7:48:11 AM PDT by Baynative (Please check this out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFIcZkEzc8I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
They should be shot with bullets dipped in pig blood by a all female bikini clad firing squad. And that treasonous whore of an attorney with them.
25 posted on 05/07/2012 7:49:51 AM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Click the link. The Republic you save may be your own.

26 posted on 05/07/2012 8:02:04 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Exactly if being able to see will cause these morons to sin, then “out with their eyes.” Take their heads off too, both of them, that way one won’t cause the other one to sin.

This man thinks our system gives him the power to humiliate both women and men by demanding woman in his presence are dressed in a manner demeaning to their humanity and beliefs because his belief that woman are made to be humiliated are supposedly “religious.” This a a power play, it is all about inflicting humiliation and gaining power for archaic chauvinistic sharia/islamic ideology. We’ve outlawed this type of bigotry in our country and should not be bamboozled into allowing those who have not caught up, to inflict upon us that which is morally and humanly wrong. Islam teaches men to be arrogant, domineering and hateful. Christianity teaches men to humble and enlightened, it teaches compassion and forgiveness to both men and women. Christianity teaches that men (and women) are better then their animal instincts, while islam reinforces inhuman, beastly behavior in men towards woman, children and other men whom they deem to be less then them.


27 posted on 05/07/2012 8:35:37 AM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Agree. Misogynist chauvinistic bigots should not have the right to dictate how women dress. They should be forced to take a class in sensitivity and respect toward modern western Judeo-Christian society, as well as being blindfold when in the presence of woman who are not their family. Though removing their eyes below their necks seems the better choice.


28 posted on 05/07/2012 8:45:27 AM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Looks like her Linkedln page no longer exists.


29 posted on 05/07/2012 8:57:16 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

I would be dressing like a serious vamp carrying a pig skin purse and Koran for the trial. I would sit and quietly shred the pages of the Koran.


30 posted on 05/07/2012 10:24:41 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

This post is no good without pictures!


31 posted on 05/07/2012 12:11:21 PM PDT by Finatic (I ran out of change and have given up on hope. FUBO, I am so sick of your sorry a$$ you effin punk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
“...said that her client had demanded she wear the clothing” At this point, I would be closing my briefcase and telling the guy “you are so done. Get yourself a new attorney or represent yourself.”

That's why you're not an attorney. You don't recognize an advertising opportunity when you see it. What, you think this is about law? Bwahahahaha!

32 posted on 05/07/2012 12:42:52 PM PDT by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson