Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battleground Poll: Obama, Romney in dead heat (Romney 48, Obama 47)
Politico ^ | 05/07/2012 | James Hohmann

Posted on 05/07/2012 7:26:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

A new POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll finds a dead heat in the presidential race six months before the election.

Mitt Romney edged out President Barack Obama 48 percent to 47 percent among likely voters, a number well within the margin of error, as Republicans rapidly consolidate behind the likely GOP nominee.

The former Massachusetts governor has opened up a 10-point lead, 48 percent to 38 percent, among independents in a poll conducted Sunday, April 29 through Thursday, May 3 and a 6-point lead among those who describe themselves as “extremely likely” to vote in November. Obama led Romney by 9 points overall in POLITICO’s February’s poll.

But there are suggestions that these numbers are extremely fluid: Obama holds double-digit leads over the presumptive Republican nominee on issues such as who will better handle foreign policy and who will stand up for the middle class and on “sharing your values.” But enduring concern about the economy — by far the most important issue to voters — keeps the president in a tenuous position despite employment numbers that show slight but steady improvement.

While approval of Congress remains in the basement at 13 percent, the poll shows that voters aren’t inclined to throw all the bums out in another major push for change.

The GOP has taken a narrow 45 percent to 43 percent lead on the generic congressional ballot, according to the poll, and 65 percent believe Republicans will continue to control the House majority after the election. Forty-one percent believe Democrats will keep the Senate majority.

Despite the buzz about who will be Romney’s vice presidential pick, nearly two-thirds of respondents said the vice presidential nominee will not affect their vote. Of the 35 percent who said it will have an impact, just 7 percent described the veep choice as extremely important to their decision.

The president’s job approval rating stands at 48 percent, down 5 points from February and a number now equal to the percentage of voters who disapprove of Obama’s performance.

The results signal that as the general election phase of the campaign gets under way, who will win the presidency is a jump ball.

A full 91 percent of Republicans support Romney, slightly exceeding the percentage of Democrats who support Obama.

Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who helped conduct the bipartisan poll, called it “a predictable tightening of the race.”

“You have both sides very consolidated,” she said. “There are no signs of fissures on either side, but you have the Democrats less enthusiastic than the Republicans.”

Americans are split evenly about Obama’s economic policies: Forty percent said he’s made the economy better; 39 percent said he’s made it worse; and 19 percent said he’s had no impact on it.

Republican pollster Ed Goeas of The Tarrance Group said the 19 percent who don’t think Obama has affected the economy — which split 46 percent for Romney and 44 percent for Obama — will decide the election.

“Do they break to believing the economy is better? Do they break to believing the economy is not better?” he said Sunday. “Watch that. It’s key.”

Voters have mixed feelings about the direction of the economy: Forty-two percent believe its growing; 22 percent think it’s not moving; and 34 percent believe it’s either in a recession or approaching one.

That split exists despite 59 percent of respondents saying the country is headed down the wrong track. Just one-third believe the country is moving in the right direction, a troublingly low number for any incumbent.

Most respondents have already made up their minds about how to vote in the fall: Forty-three percent said with certainty they will vote to reelect Obama, and 42 percent said they will vote to replace the president. Eleven percent said they will consider voting for someone else.

A gender gap still exists, but it appears to be narrowing. Obama leads among women by 7 percentage points, while Romney has the same lead among male voters. But among women younger than 45 , Obama leads 57 percent to 39 percent. Yet Romney leads among women older than 45, 50 percent to 45 percent. The Republican also leads among white women, 57 percent to 38 percent.

The electorate continues to overwhelmingly agree the most important issues in the election are the economy (28 percent), government spending (17 percent) and jobs (14 percent). A problem for the president: A plurality of voters disapproves of Obama’s performance in these three critical areas.

But that doesn’t mean Romney has a decisive advantage. On who specifically would better handle job creation, Obama leads Romney, 48 percent to 46 percent. On who would better guide the economy as a whole, Romney leads, 48 percent to 45 percent.

Anti-Obama sentiment continues to be more intense than pro-Obama sentiment. For example, twice as many voters strongly disapprove of the president’s handling of the economy as those who strongly approve. On the budget and spending, it’s a nearly 3-to-1 ratio.

Romney, a former Bain Capital executive, has pitched himself as a turnaround specialist who can be a strong economic steward. The Obama campaign, trying to disqualify him in the eyes of voters, is working to define him as someone more concerned with creating wealth for himself and his rich friends than with creating jobs for everyday folks.

There are signs that effort is paying dividends and that many voters don’t believe Romney feels their pain. Obama has a 10-point edge, 50 percent to 40 percent, on the question of who “sharing your values.” Obama also has an advantage, 58 percent to 35 percent, on who stands up more for the middle class.

Obama’s 10-point edge on the “sharing your values” question is significant for the president because the issue has historically correlated closely to voter preference in the fall.

“For decades, the Democrats were at a disadvantage on ‘shares our values’ because it was more a moral dimension,” Lake said. “Now it seems to be more of an economic ‘in-touch-with-my-life-economically’ dimension. That allows the Democrats to be a lot more competitive on it.”

Those numbers help explain why the Romney campaign is trying to keep the election a referendum on Obama’s job performance as much as possible, focusing specifically on his stewardship of the economy. The high command in Boston realizes that the more the election is about Romney as the alternative, the harder it will be for him to win.

The unemployment rate, which dipped to 8.1 percent in April despite a tepid number of new jobs because people have stopped looking for work, plays a large role in how voters assess the nation’s economic health. When read a list of seven indicators, 46 percent identified “the number of Americans who have a job” as the best way to judge economic strength. One-sixth cited the best indicator of economic strength as their personal ability to pay bills and have some money left over. Only 5 percent named gas prices.

The president has a 13-point edge over Romney, 51 percent to 38 percent, on who is better equipped to handle foreign policy, an area that has been the GOP’s domain. The poll was in the field during intensive coverage of the one-year anniversary of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The president has a historically unusual 6-point edge over Romney on tax policy, but he must tread cautiously. Fifty percent disapprove of his handling of the issue.

While there is general support for high tax rates for millionaires, voters harbor deep suspicions about how Obama would spend the money. Seven in 10 said they want any additional revenue to help pay down the deficit, but 61 percent think the president would use it for increased domestic spending.

A good sign for Romney is that he performed just as well against Obama as a generic, unnamed Republican candidate. Coming out of the primaries, 56 percent of all voters approve of him on a personal level.

The president continues to maintain an impressive reservoir of goodwill among voters. Seventy percent have a positive personal impression of Obama. Only 25 percent disapprove of him personally. But among the one-quarter of voters who like Obama personally but don’t like the job he’s doing, 68 percent said they will vote to replace him.

The poll asked voters whether Romney’s membership in the Mormon Church will affect their vote. While 81 percent insisted it will make no difference, 16 percent acknowledged it makes them less likely to support him. This fits with other public polls.

The POLITICO/George Washington University Battleground Poll of 1,000 likely voters was conducted from April 29 to May 3 by The Tarrance Group and Lake Research Partners. The nationwide telephone survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. For the first time, the poll included cellphone users. They make up a quarter of the sample.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; poll; romney

1 posted on 05/07/2012 7:26:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

See full poll results here:

http://www.politico.com/polls/politico-george-washington-university-battleground-poll.html


2 posted on 05/07/2012 7:27:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a shocker! Obama and Obama-lite tied.


3 posted on 05/07/2012 7:29:59 AM PDT by BipolarBob ("Oh no, I'm not sick, well I'm not physically sick anyway. Mentally I'm sick beyond any doctor's abi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama holds double-digit leads over the presumptive Republican nominee on issues such as who will better handle foreign policy and who will stand up for the middle class and on “sharing your values.”

You have got to be sh##ting me. Are there that many freaking Marxists in this country?

4 posted on 05/07/2012 7:35:12 AM PDT by Marathoner (At least Ann Romney won't tell us what to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Did they over poll Rats? I don’t see how if Romney has a 10 pt. lead among independents that the race could be tied.


5 posted on 05/07/2012 7:35:32 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner

People are really dumb aren’t they? Obama is DESTROYING the middle class.


6 posted on 05/07/2012 7:37:42 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

politico and AP/Al-Reuters will be calling it a dead heat if it were 55/40..


7 posted on 05/07/2012 7:39:13 AM PDT by SueRae (The Tower of Sauron falls on 11.06.2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

so, which side has the dead voters ?

“What is the likelihood of your voting in the elections to be held this November— are you extremely likely,
very likely, somewhat likely, or not very likely at all to vote?
Extremely Likely ................................................ 76%
(CONTINUE) Very Likely ........................................................ 21%
Somewhat Likely.................................................. 4%”


8 posted on 05/07/2012 7:40:50 AM PDT by stylin19a (Obama - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

oops...sorry...my original was from February.
This is from April-May

What is the likelihood of your voting in the elections to be held this November— are you extremely likely,
very likely, somewhat likely, or not very likely at all to vote?
Extremely Likely ..................................................... 72%
(CONTINUE) Very Likely .............................................................. 24%
Somewhat Likely ....................................................... 4%


9 posted on 05/07/2012 7:43:41 AM PDT by stylin19a (Obama - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

One admirable thing about the French is that their presidential elections are mercifully short. Our two-year+ election campaigns are becoming more ludicrous with each election. Even the Mexicans are more efficient, with their elections coming up in seven weeks.


10 posted on 05/07/2012 7:47:00 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

From late March concerning an Ohio senate race: “As is the case with President Barack Obama’s lead in the White House race, the Democratic margin is made up almost completely of the votes of women,” said Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. “


11 posted on 05/07/2012 7:49:48 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

No. It looks like they polled MSNBC, ABC, CBS and NBC along with the coffee guy at Politico. Hell, they probably polled the janitor at GWU, too.


12 posted on 05/07/2012 7:54:38 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama’s campaign is in deep trouble, and a Romney landslide is possible. Many people who tell pollsters they support Obama are just giving the politically correct answer, and will either stay home or vote for Romney in the privacy of the voting booth. They may even tell exit pollsters they voted for Obama.


13 posted on 05/07/2012 7:55:17 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marathoner

“You have got to be sh##ting me. Are there that many freaking Marxists in this country?”

60%+ of our budget goes to entitlements. Why should they not be Marxists?


14 posted on 05/07/2012 7:56:48 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Still doesn’t answer the question. If Obama leads by 7 among women and Romney by 7 among men, it’s a wash, and Romney leads by 10 among independents. If the same number of women and men, and Republicans and Democrats were polled, Romney should be winning unless Obama gets Republican votes or more Rats. Were polled than Republicans.

Anyone know the party breakdown for this poll?


15 posted on 05/07/2012 7:58:37 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

This was said over and over in the lead up to the 2008 election and turned out not to be true.


16 posted on 05/07/2012 7:59:54 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement; SeekAndFind

Sorry, post number 15 was meant as a reply for you ConservativeStatement.


17 posted on 05/07/2012 8:02:04 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
On May 2, I published a reply which contained the following two paragraphs:

"Today's employment numbers, confirmed by Rasmussen's polling on unemployment, about to be echoed Friday by the larger employment numbers for April, following on the heels of the downward revision of GDP, coupled with high gas prices at the pump, all spell defeat for the incumbent.

"I think in retrospect you will see this moment as the turning point in the polls and all of those yellow states on the electoral college map will go to light blue and even the light blue states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will turn yellow."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2879045/posts

This is the second nationwide poll that puts the candidates in this position and it is in my judgment that it is not the stasis position but actually the crossing of the lines. Although the trends will not be straight-line I think we will see an increasing momentum for Romney.

As this trend becomes increasingly clear to Obama by virtue of his internals (which explains his behavior in recent weeks), he is much more likely to pull the trigger on an October Surprise:

Nevermind the Ides of March Beware The Surprises of October


18 posted on 05/07/2012 8:02:49 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Many people who tell pollsters they support Obama are just giving the politically correct answer”

I don’t disagree...but...just how do we know that to be true?


19 posted on 05/07/2012 8:09:35 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

It has to be an oversampling of Dems. I wonder if all these polls are taking into account the current shrinking of the Dem voter rolls and growth of independent and GOP? Given that Romney shows the lead among independents, it is hard to believe this poll.

Of course, I am estimating that at this stage, the fact that Obama is a few ticks below 50% and that Romney is ahead are both good signs, regardless of the poll internals.


20 posted on 05/07/2012 8:14:58 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Forget this poll and all others taken before. Mitt Romney has not yet begun to really fight Obama. Until we get into August, it’s useless to follow any poll. The vast numbers of American voters are not yet tuned in to the POTUS election.

However, things to note: Obama had a dismal campaign opener in Ohio where he addressed a half filled college arena. Obama poll numbers have been underwater for months, the economy is in deep recession, Obama cannot hold a campaign rally in public, other then on a college campus arena or labor union hall, etc. I predict things will get a lot worse for this failed POTUS, Obama on a number of fronts.

My own demograpics suggest he will lose big time to Romney, not because Romney is overpowering, but... because Obama should be a dogcatcher rather then USA POTUS. Right now, I predict: Romney, 55%, Obama, 45%. Over time, and, as Romney ramps up and gets better known, the polls will really start shifting in Romney’s direction. With luck, Romney could garner 57% of the votes cast versus 43% percent for Obama. Millions of young voters and American Blacks will sit on their hands, come election Day, November, 2012.

Obama will lose, that is certain. But.....the real damage will be the almost destruction of the current Democrat Party. Obama will drag down literally hundreds of Democrat officeholders all across the country. IMHO, The Democrat Party would be wise to broom Obama right now, either by forcing him out of office or, having Obama decline to run for re-election. Anything less means a “train wreck” of devastating dimensions for the Democrat Party.


21 posted on 05/07/2012 8:18:02 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

There needs to be a season but when you have a media obsessed with government there are no limits to that obsession.

I fear we will have Carl Cameron’s smirk with us for eternity.


22 posted on 05/07/2012 8:20:56 AM PDT by relictele (We are officially OUT of other people's money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
It is a very depressing election. No matter who wins, we lose.

I prefer Romney win if only because his court picks will probably be more conservative than Obama's, but my fear is a Romney Presidency will do far more damage to conservatives over the long run.

He isn't interested in real reform which means his Presidency will wind up a failure, and even though he is not a conservative, his failure will be used to condemn conservatism overall.

23 posted on 05/07/2012 8:20:56 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Romney isn’t even the candidate yet.

This is, after all, politico.


24 posted on 05/07/2012 8:22:29 AM PDT by Sigurdrifta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

If Romney wins (which he won’t), then you can kiss 2016 goodbye.


25 posted on 05/07/2012 8:22:29 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

“It is a very depressing election. No matter who wins, we lose.”

No no no... may not be your Utopia but a Obama win we lose-lose and Romney win we lose some win some.... I’ll take the latter especially when applied to the courts....


26 posted on 05/07/2012 8:29:01 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Republic Rocker
No no no... may not be your Utopia but a Obama win we lose-lose and Romney win we lose some win some

We win some, we lose some over the next four years.

Looking further out into the future, I think a Romney presidency likely does tremendous damage to the GOP (not that big a deal to me) and to conservative principles (a huge deal to me).

If his presidency fails, and it will, it will set conservatism back for years. Our chances of electing a true conservative in the future gets much dimmer.

Don't get me wrong, I will vote for him and pray for the best, but it will be with a heavy heart.

27 posted on 05/07/2012 8:35:45 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

I’m 100% for Romney and I will no longer call my stance ABO.

And I’m so sick of these repetivive arguments that I could scream.

I would if everyone could hear me.

We will have that in a few more years if I’m still alive to see it ... I mean hear it.


28 posted on 05/07/2012 8:38:31 AM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

That is exactly the type of political obliteration that the RATS deserve - from White House to local dog catcher.


29 posted on 05/07/2012 8:41:17 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I love the thought of Obama losing and dragging all his cronies down with him.

Contrary to popular opinion here, I think Romney has the best chance against Obama of our candidates. I won’t rehash the old arguments here.

The dems lie without shame or hesitation. There was a girl named Margie (I think) on F&F this morning who was claiming Obama would win because he had created so many private sector jobs and people want to see that continue.

It’s amazing how they can say stuff like that and appear to mean it.


30 posted on 05/07/2012 8:45:48 AM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“I think in retrospect you will see this moment as the turning point in the polls and all of those yellow states on the electoral college map will go to light blue and even the light blue states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will turn yellow.”

Correction:

The yellow states will go pink.


31 posted on 05/07/2012 8:46:54 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Romney should do what Reagan did against Carter, one debate a week or so before the election. All he has to do is look like he’s not a complete idiot and he can win it big.


32 posted on 05/07/2012 9:04:06 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
What a shocker! Obama and Obama-lite tied.

I'm voting... with my hands on my nose--for Obama-lite. If we let Zero win, we will not the nation that the founders made...

I know we aren't the nation founded, but I think ZERO will SUSPEND the CONSTITUTION if Obamacare is defeated!!

33 posted on 05/07/2012 9:16:43 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Romney has yet to consolidate the center-right, and might not, and might not have to.

In 1980, with John Anderson, a centrist Republican, and Ed Clark, a libertarian, taking 8 percent of the vote between them, Ronald Reagan, a conservative Republican, still managed to trounce Jimmy Carter, 51 to 41 percent.

There are some differences and some similarities this time. Mitt Romney is a centrist, the Libertarians have a fine candidate (for them) in a former 2-term Republican Governor of New Mexico. The Constitution Party also has a fine candidate, a multi-term Congressman from Virginia (but on how many states, and which states, will he be on the ballot?). Plus, there’s a possibility that Americans Elect will nominate Buddy Roemer, a former Republican Governor of Louisiana, or Rocky Anderson, a former Democratic Mayor of Salt Lake City.

The Democrats will definitely seek to make each of these three candidates viable. I even think they’ll figure things out, and help get them onto the ballot in select states such as Ohio and Virginia.

On the other hand, the Green Party candidate will be a nothing candidate on few ballots.

With continued softness in the economy, it won’t matter. Romney will landslide even with various center-right third party candidates taking significant numbers of votes. (By the way, this is the scenario that is most probable.)

But, should there be a pick-up in the economy, it’s possible the stars will align to the benefit of Mr. Big Ears.


34 posted on 05/07/2012 9:22:33 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: altura

You must remember, that Obama has had a monopoly of time, media worship, and campaign edge for over six months. He has been running for re-election for two years, unopposed from either his own party or any Republican. That Romney is where he is at at this stage is amazing, IMHO. Meanwhile the country is going to hell in a hand basket with a leaderless, egomanic Obama steering the ship of state into failure across the board. Just like Adolf Hitler blamed everyone around him for his Third Reich failure, when the real problem was Hitler himself. And....IMHO, Adolf Hitler and Barack Hussein Obama are one and the same!!!

But......I’ll give you another tidbit. The folks really being hurt by Obama are American Blacks, other minorities and young folks. Witness the job opportunities for these folks. There are literally none, with the exception being, low wage service industry jobs!!! Under the Obama thumb, they will never be free to grow and succeed. Sad!!!

Obama will keep them chained to the bottom of our economic totem pole forever, so that he can remain in power. Obama cares about no one but himself. He must be defeated, so that all Americans can really have the oppotunity to live the true American dream, uninhibited by an oppressive, Obama government. More on that as this campaign moves along.


35 posted on 05/07/2012 9:26:23 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson