Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush
WND ^ | 5/7/2012 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 05/07/2012 12:42:10 PM PDT by GregNH

Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s top-rated radio talk-show host, briefly brought up the issue of Barack Obama’s potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number, since the president has never lived in the Constitution State.

While speaking with a caller named Rob about Obama’s alleged deception of citizens, Limbaugh tossed out the question: “What are your thoughts on the fact Obama’s Social Security Number is from Connecticut and he’s never been there?”

Rob responded, “That’s what you call a red flag. A red flag is also, ‘First of all, I don’t need to give you my birth certificate,’ and then finally, ‘I’ll give you a copy,’ Oh, that’s a modern copy … We don’t need copies, we need originals.”

Rob continued, “How about releasing all of your college papers and let’s see what you really thought about America when you were in college? He’s deceiving us.”

“That’s true,” said Limbaugh. “They don’t want [us] to see what those term papers, doctoral theses and so forth actually were about, nor do they want us to see the grades. They don’t want us to see the grades.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; draft; draftregistration; esmit; identityfraud; identitythief; naturalborncitizen; obama; rushlimbaugh; selectiveservice; socialsecurity; ssregistration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-182 next last
To: GregNH

He should get Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe on the show. The Media Matters hacks would have a heart attack!


101 posted on 05/07/2012 4:17:23 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Just happened to hear it. Rush pussy-footed about it in fine fashion ... one digression followed another as he fought to get to break time without saying anything about the verboten legitimacy issue ... a masterpiece of issue avoidance.

Caused me to wonder how the kid got through the doubtless now-fired screener! Rush is a consummate professional. When heeza no wanna talk about sumpin, hezza no talk about it!

102 posted on 05/07/2012 4:18:24 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They will produce some 78 year old retired bureaucrat from the Social Security Administration who will go public and admit that “it was my mistake that President Obama got an incorrect Social Security number. I was having a bad day and my fingers just hit the wrong keys on the keyboard”.

Sixty days later he will move into one of the nicest houses in Boca Raton.


Let’s see the original SSN application. Trust but verify!


103 posted on 05/07/2012 4:18:52 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

They are using the BC as the “rodeo clown” to marginilize “birthers” and keep attention away from the college stuff.


Can’t marginalize forgery, fraud, intimidation and dare I say....murder???


104 posted on 05/07/2012 4:20:30 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kabar

plenty of people have questioned it.

tens of millions believe he’s not eligible

but gutless cowards hem and haw over doing anything.

like i see here


105 posted on 05/07/2012 4:22:08 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: kabar

and if you missed it, the common language was already addressed:

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their “


U.S. Supreme Court
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/88/162/case.html


106 posted on 05/07/2012 4:25:35 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sten

“but gutless cowards hem and haw over doing anything.”

Because they would be laughed at and lose their jobs.


107 posted on 05/07/2012 4:35:00 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Any Republican. Just NO Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sten
Again, you can argue the legalities citing various cases to support your position. Tribe and Olson have their own views and cite different cases. I provided you with their evaluation and written opinion. They disagree with your position.

Tribe/Olson Natural Born Citizen Memo

The bottom line is that we do not have a SCOTUS case that defines natural born citizen as it applies to being eligible to be President of the United States. It matters little what I think or you think for that matter. What counts is what the courts think.

We now have the precedent of someone occupying the WH born of one parent who was not a US citizen. There is some question as to whether Obama's parents were married even though they got a divorce. Somehow, we need to get the issue before the courts either with Obama or someone else who has standing.

This is not settled law.

108 posted on 05/07/2012 4:47:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I heard this segment. What bummed me out is that Rush set up the caller to mention that Sheriff Joe found probable cause for forgery and fraud involving the long-form BC, and the caller didn’t mention it. Could be the caller didn’t know about Sheriff Joe - thanks to Soros’ threats to the media.

I would have loved it if the caller had said, “Rush, remember the day that you had that bomb scare? It was the same day that Andrew Breitbart fell over dead. Well, Sheriff Joe Arpaio had a press conference that day where he announced that they have probable cause for forgery and fraud involving the BC that Obama announced as his genuine long-form at a White House press conference. So law enforcement has already determined that 2 crimes were committed when Obama held that press conference. The media hasn’t reported on it because they were threatened by Soros operatives, according to the Sheriff Joe’s lead investigator for the posse.”

It was such a perfect set-up. We just need to keep getting the word out there so that if opportunities like that arise again, people will know to bring this up.


109 posted on 05/07/2012 4:51:10 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; potlatch; onyx

FAKE HETERO CHRISTIAN NBC HAS FAKE SSN, BC, WIFE, GIRLFRIENDS

110 posted on 05/07/2012 4:51:54 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Well if you remember Lou Dobbs was beating the BC issue for a while. He had bullet come through his living room window and was later released from his contract. I heard Hannity is an off the cuff remake about this subject say “I have children.” We know Beck has been threatened. So one can only assume that there was edict issued. “Talk about this and you will be sorry.”


111 posted on 05/07/2012 4:52:37 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mtnwmn

He definitely uses Drudge and mentions him.

If he once used this site, I doubt if he does anymore. Not after what we’ve been doing here.


112 posted on 05/07/2012 4:58:26 PM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

so they shirk their responsibility to defend the Constitution out of fear of being laughed at?

imagine what they’d do if someone pointed a gun in their direction. or a canon.

thank goodness our founders were made of much sterner stuff


113 posted on 05/07/2012 4:58:26 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
"The other day I watched an 18-minute speech from Anita Moncrief, former ACORN heavy, now Tea Partier. Now, that's what I call a speech. She unloads a ton of information in 18 minutes, no notes, no teleprompter, and nary an 'uh'."

If you've got a link to that or can point me in the right direction it'd be much appreciated.

114 posted on 05/07/2012 5:00:30 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
We just need to keep getting the word out there so that if opportunities like that arise again, people will know to bring this up.

I am so plugged in with the "underground" if you will and there too much talk about revolution. I mean pick up you guns and bring your friends to DC kinda talk. There is a powder keg about to explode out there. And quit frankly if it happens I am gasing up my truck.

But you are 100% correct. When I first started blogging about this back in 08 there was very little response. I had created a Google email alerts for him. The amount of alerts I get now far outnumber the ones I got in 08, 09, 10, and 11. Good sign.

Let us pray that we do not have to take back our country as the founders described we may have to.....

115 posted on 05/07/2012 5:01:53 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sten

“this REQUIRES the person to have been born on US soil ... AS WELL AS.. being born of TWO US citizen parents”

What requires that documentation?


116 posted on 05/07/2012 5:14:54 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=344zseAQhQM


117 posted on 05/07/2012 5:17:38 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs
“Good, then he’s torqued off about a quarter or more of the posters here by daring to talk about Hussein’s fraudulent documentation.”

That's because that particular horse has been beat to death. True...false...it doesn't make any difference.

But the SS card is worthy of further scrutiny. Also, I heard he has used 5-6 DIFFERENCE SSN’s.

118 posted on 05/07/2012 5:18:44 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

His staff monitors FR on a daily basis for news items.

He has mentioned FR and used the term “FReepers” a number of times over the years.

He’s not the only one. We even have a local talk radio guy that does it. He never credits FR but I can tell by the stories and the order in which he presents them that he is reading the same FR threads I did earlier in the day.

We are “show prep” for Rush and Rush wannabes!


119 posted on 05/07/2012 5:24:03 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

WRONG! Another Snopes lie!

According to Ancestry.com, the zip code for Stanley A Dunham’s residence in 1987 at 1617 S Beretania is 96826, NOT 96814. This Stanley is Barack Obama’s grandfather, not his mother. This is the same address and zip code on Obama’s 1980 selective service registration....

U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 about Stanley A Dunham
Name: Stanley A Dunham
Address: 1617 S Beretania St Apt 1008, Honolulu, HI, 96826-1112 (1987)

Source Information:
Ancestry.com. U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings


120 posted on 05/07/2012 5:27:55 PM PDT by Jonah Vark (Any 5th grader knows that the Constitution declares the separation of powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson