Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Conn. Social Security Number hits Rush
WND ^ | 5/7/2012 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 05/07/2012 12:42:10 PM PDT by GregNH

Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s top-rated radio talk-show host, briefly brought up the issue of Barack Obama’s potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number, since the president has never lived in the Constitution State.

While speaking with a caller named Rob about Obama’s alleged deception of citizens, Limbaugh tossed out the question: “What are your thoughts on the fact Obama’s Social Security Number is from Connecticut and he’s never been there?”

Rob responded, “That’s what you call a red flag. A red flag is also, ‘First of all, I don’t need to give you my birth certificate,’ and then finally, ‘I’ll give you a copy,’ Oh, that’s a modern copy … We don’t need copies, we need originals.”

Rob continued, “How about releasing all of your college papers and let’s see what you really thought about America when you were in college? He’s deceiving us.”

“That’s true,” said Limbaugh. “They don’t want [us] to see what those term papers, doctoral theses and so forth actually were about, nor do they want us to see the grades. They don’t want us to see the grades.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; draft; draftregistration; esmit; identityfraud; identitythief; naturalborncitizen; obama; rushlimbaugh; selectiveservice; socialsecurity; ssregistration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 next last
To: GregNH

He should get Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe on the show. The Media Matters hacks would have a heart attack!


101 posted on 05/07/2012 4:17:23 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Just happened to hear it. Rush pussy-footed about it in fine fashion ... one digression followed another as he fought to get to break time without saying anything about the verboten legitimacy issue ... a masterpiece of issue avoidance.

Caused me to wonder how the kid got through the doubtless now-fired screener! Rush is a consummate professional. When heeza no wanna talk about sumpin, hezza no talk about it!

102 posted on 05/07/2012 4:18:24 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They will produce some 78 year old retired bureaucrat from the Social Security Administration who will go public and admit that “it was my mistake that President Obama got an incorrect Social Security number. I was having a bad day and my fingers just hit the wrong keys on the keyboard”.

Sixty days later he will move into one of the nicest houses in Boca Raton.


Let’s see the original SSN application. Trust but verify!


103 posted on 05/07/2012 4:18:52 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

They are using the BC as the “rodeo clown” to marginilize “birthers” and keep attention away from the college stuff.


Can’t marginalize forgery, fraud, intimidation and dare I say....murder???


104 posted on 05/07/2012 4:20:30 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kabar

plenty of people have questioned it.

tens of millions believe he’s not eligible

but gutless cowards hem and haw over doing anything.

like i see here


105 posted on 05/07/2012 4:22:08 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: kabar

and if you missed it, the common language was already addressed:

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their “


U.S. Supreme Court
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/88/162/case.html


106 posted on 05/07/2012 4:25:35 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sten

“but gutless cowards hem and haw over doing anything.”

Because they would be laughed at and lose their jobs.


107 posted on 05/07/2012 4:35:00 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Any Republican. Just NO Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sten
Again, you can argue the legalities citing various cases to support your position. Tribe and Olson have their own views and cite different cases. I provided you with their evaluation and written opinion. They disagree with your position.

Tribe/Olson Natural Born Citizen Memo

The bottom line is that we do not have a SCOTUS case that defines natural born citizen as it applies to being eligible to be President of the United States. It matters little what I think or you think for that matter. What counts is what the courts think.

We now have the precedent of someone occupying the WH born of one parent who was not a US citizen. There is some question as to whether Obama's parents were married even though they got a divorce. Somehow, we need to get the issue before the courts either with Obama or someone else who has standing.

This is not settled law.

108 posted on 05/07/2012 4:47:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I heard this segment. What bummed me out is that Rush set up the caller to mention that Sheriff Joe found probable cause for forgery and fraud involving the long-form BC, and the caller didn’t mention it. Could be the caller didn’t know about Sheriff Joe - thanks to Soros’ threats to the media.

I would have loved it if the caller had said, “Rush, remember the day that you had that bomb scare? It was the same day that Andrew Breitbart fell over dead. Well, Sheriff Joe Arpaio had a press conference that day where he announced that they have probable cause for forgery and fraud involving the BC that Obama announced as his genuine long-form at a White House press conference. So law enforcement has already determined that 2 crimes were committed when Obama held that press conference. The media hasn’t reported on it because they were threatened by Soros operatives, according to the Sheriff Joe’s lead investigator for the posse.”

It was such a perfect set-up. We just need to keep getting the word out there so that if opportunities like that arise again, people will know to bring this up.


109 posted on 05/07/2012 4:51:10 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; potlatch; onyx

FAKE HETERO CHRISTIAN NBC HAS FAKE SSN, BC, WIFE, GIRLFRIENDS

110 posted on 05/07/2012 4:51:54 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Well if you remember Lou Dobbs was beating the BC issue for a while. He had bullet come through his living room window and was later released from his contract. I heard Hannity is an off the cuff remake about this subject say “I have children.” We know Beck has been threatened. So one can only assume that there was edict issued. “Talk about this and you will be sorry.”


111 posted on 05/07/2012 4:52:37 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mtnwmn

He definitely uses Drudge and mentions him.

If he once used this site, I doubt if he does anymore. Not after what we’ve been doing here.


112 posted on 05/07/2012 4:58:26 PM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

so they shirk their responsibility to defend the Constitution out of fear of being laughed at?

imagine what they’d do if someone pointed a gun in their direction. or a canon.

thank goodness our founders were made of much sterner stuff


113 posted on 05/07/2012 4:58:26 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
"The other day I watched an 18-minute speech from Anita Moncrief, former ACORN heavy, now Tea Partier. Now, that's what I call a speech. She unloads a ton of information in 18 minutes, no notes, no teleprompter, and nary an 'uh'."

If you've got a link to that or can point me in the right direction it'd be much appreciated.

114 posted on 05/07/2012 5:00:30 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
We just need to keep getting the word out there so that if opportunities like that arise again, people will know to bring this up.

I am so plugged in with the "underground" if you will and there too much talk about revolution. I mean pick up you guns and bring your friends to DC kinda talk. There is a powder keg about to explode out there. And quit frankly if it happens I am gasing up my truck.

But you are 100% correct. When I first started blogging about this back in 08 there was very little response. I had created a Google email alerts for him. The amount of alerts I get now far outnumber the ones I got in 08, 09, 10, and 11. Good sign.

Let us pray that we do not have to take back our country as the founders described we may have to.....

115 posted on 05/07/2012 5:01:53 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sten

“this REQUIRES the person to have been born on US soil ... AS WELL AS.. being born of TWO US citizen parents”

What requires that documentation?


116 posted on 05/07/2012 5:14:54 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=344zseAQhQM


117 posted on 05/07/2012 5:17:38 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs
“Good, then he’s torqued off about a quarter or more of the posters here by daring to talk about Hussein’s fraudulent documentation.”

That's because that particular horse has been beat to death. True...false...it doesn't make any difference.

But the SS card is worthy of further scrutiny. Also, I heard he has used 5-6 DIFFERENCE SSN’s.

118 posted on 05/07/2012 5:18:44 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (The response to 1984 is 1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

His staff monitors FR on a daily basis for news items.

He has mentioned FR and used the term “FReepers” a number of times over the years.

He’s not the only one. We even have a local talk radio guy that does it. He never credits FR but I can tell by the stories and the order in which he presents them that he is reading the same FR threads I did earlier in the day.

We are “show prep” for Rush and Rush wannabes!


119 posted on 05/07/2012 5:24:03 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

WRONG! Another Snopes lie!

According to Ancestry.com, the zip code for Stanley A Dunham’s residence in 1987 at 1617 S Beretania is 96826, NOT 96814. This Stanley is Barack Obama’s grandfather, not his mother. This is the same address and zip code on Obama’s 1980 selective service registration....

U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 about Stanley A Dunham
Name: Stanley A Dunham
Address: 1617 S Beretania St Apt 1008, Honolulu, HI, 96826-1112 (1987)

Source Information:
Ancestry.com. U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings


120 posted on 05/07/2012 5:27:55 PM PDT by Jonah Vark (Any 5th grader knows that the Constitution declares the separation of powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I have always wanted to know the whole story where he lived when on the mainland and to see his college records. They have kept that info locked up tighter than Ft. Knox and there must be reasons.


121 posted on 05/07/2012 5:30:04 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten
I am disgusted every day at our gutless Republican congress persons.

Frankly, I just don't get it why one of them don't want to make a name for themselves.
Oh, they oppose the imposter alright. But they do it so they don't lose their job.

122 posted on 05/07/2012 5:55:34 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Any Republican. Just NO Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

Thanks much, FRiend!


123 posted on 05/07/2012 6:00:23 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Let me make a point:

Has anyone ever seen a person on the face of this earth try and hide his/her records like this person?

I didn't think so.

The question then is, why?

124 posted on 05/07/2012 6:03:16 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Any Republican. Just NO Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

One of my favorites.
Happy Birthday Phil.


125 posted on 05/07/2012 6:10:32 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I heard the conversation today. When the caller brought up the birth certificate, what disappointed me is the fact that Rush seized upon what OBAMA put out, despite the fact Rush has daily repeated Obama is a liar. He did not seize upon Arpaio’s formal investigation which was led by experts in document analysis. So....Rush accepts Obamas version, but fails to bring up Arpaios’ report. I was very disappointed in Rush today.


126 posted on 05/07/2012 6:16:39 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

Exactly my point. THE BC ISSUE IS OFF LIMITS, period.


127 posted on 05/07/2012 6:33:51 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

Can we get a HI HO for the inventor of the internet! LOL


128 posted on 05/07/2012 6:37:22 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the Ping. Good thread.


129 posted on 05/07/2012 7:06:50 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

http://easterniowanewsnow.com/tag/patrick-roan/

more info for the student loan info-breakers


130 posted on 05/07/2012 7:21:26 PM PDT by bitt (“There are only two races of men: the decent and the indecent.” —Viktor Frankl, survivor, Nazi co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Brave fellow!

Introducing common sense on an NBC thread. Better send the wife to start the car for a few days.

You and I can argue the definition of natural born citizen as it applies to eligibility to be President under the Constitution, but we can't resolve it. Only the courts can do that and they have never been presented with this case.

This being an NBC-related thread, I would not be doing my freeper duty to let you escape without some sort of disagreement. So, herewith:
O they have been presented with the case from the state level, to SCOTUS appeal. The courts have run from the issue under cover of procedural, jurisdictional, and standing issues, with even Supreme Court Justices (The Black-Robed Bum-kissin Bassturds) ADMITTING they seek to escape and evade responsibility on the issue upon the dozen or so occasions they have had the properly presented cases to consider it.

131 posted on 05/07/2012 7:30:21 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
The number of sheer, wild, staggering coincidences in this Fraud’s life are...incredible.

Aristotle says that good theater demands

Willing Suspension of Disbelief

We cannot deny that this has been theater. So, the problem is that you and I are just not the right audience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dada

132 posted on 05/07/2012 7:34:56 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
There is no doubt that the courts are scared to death about adjudicating this case, especially after Obama has been elected and is in the WH. Would any court have the courage to delegitimize someone who has been elected to the WH? What would the societal implications be? Riots? A breakdown in civil order? And on top of it all would be the racial aspect. The first black President is removed by the white elites who still control things.

It is not only the courts, but the politicians who are afraid to raise the issue. In AZ Russell Pearce led a tough struggle in the AZ legislature to pass a law requiring more definitive proof that future candidates for the Presidency met Constitutional requirements re eligibility in order to appear on the state ballot. Governor Jan Brewer vetoed it. I understand that another attempt will be made based on Arpaio's findings. We will see, but I doubt the ruling elite will allow such challenges. They are afraid of the consequences.

133 posted on 05/07/2012 7:55:38 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: kabar
What would the societal implications be? Riots? A breakdown in civil order? And on top of it all would be the racial aspect. The first black President is removed by the white elites who still control things.

Call it the Rodney King Effect. A word in 2007 would certainly have spared us the present agony. In re Governor Brewer: certainly no new laws are required to have states' AsG do their jobs and vet candidates. It just so happens they do this all the time!

134 posted on 05/07/2012 8:14:45 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Can we get a HI HO for the inventor of the internet! LOL

Wasn't her name Stanley Ann Dunham ( The HI HO, not the inventor of the Internet ) :-)

135 posted on 05/07/2012 8:18:46 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk; Fantasywriter
"So, the problem is that you and I are just not the right audience."

Target Audience:


136 posted on 05/07/2012 8:24:22 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: kabar
"They are afraid of the consequences. "

That seems to be the consensus, but perhaps a false one. If what could be a false premise is repeated enough, enough people will believe it, no?

I say kick the buzzard out and dare anyone to riot. Now that's a meme I can relate to.

I am ready to maintain the peace in my neighborhood and that is all that's required of anyone.

After all, how many residents do you think are needed to police their neighborhood? Not many, I'll bet. Where there's a will and a 12 gauge, there is a way.

Just sign up at the Sheriff's office and get your special deputy badges and a handful of shells. Let's give our Sheriff's the support they need to carry out their duly authorized and constitutional duty to keep the peace.

They will be over-joyed having all the extra help. Plenty of well-qualified veterans to fill the ranks.

So to the rioters, I would say, bring it on and don't forget to BYOBB.

Now, doesn't that sound more hopeful and empowering than the message of fear?

137 posted on 05/07/2012 8:27:20 PM PDT by Eastbound (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Where did that 350 prefixed number lead, to another state where he had never been?


138 posted on 05/07/2012 8:56:10 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter; GregNH

It’s not that Rush “accepts” Zero’s version, but that Rush is a chickens*** sellout who won’t touch Zero’s fraud and criminal usurpation. Rush knows. He won’t say anything because he’s a pantswetting neutered sellout, like almost all the other “conservative” talkpeople and Republicans.

I started listening to Rush in the late 80s when he was local in Sacramento. I would never listen to him now. Stopped years ago when he starting talking more about cigars and football than real important stuff.


139 posted on 05/07/2012 9:22:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: kabar; Kenny Bunk

They’re all afraid of the wrong thing.

They should be scared s***less of the consequences of continuing to cover for the silent revolution. They’re basically acting as accessories after the fact.


140 posted on 05/07/2012 9:25:43 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

The AZ law would have ensured the AG did his job. NH and LA considered similar laws.


141 posted on 05/07/2012 9:30:31 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
That seems to be the consensus, but perhaps a false one. If what could be a false premise is repeated enough, enough people will believe it, no?

We have had riots over far less. Rodney King comes to mind. And certainly race baiters like Sharpton and Jackson would get involved along with the SEIU and AFL-CIO. The Left would go nuts.

142 posted on 05/07/2012 9:33:56 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Riots are nothing compared to the extreme violence that those moving 0bastard around have in mind.


143 posted on 05/07/2012 9:42:36 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I don’t want to be too harsh against , but,....I have never figured out Why Rush, Sean, Glenn, O’Reilly, Gretta Van Sustren,...why will they not touch this? Have they been threatened. Rush has always said, “They did not make me, and they cannot break me.” So is he afraid they will make him look silly or margininalize him. He could stand in good stead for 18 million loyal listeners if he would let his nut sack hang down and tell this truth loudly and clearly. But he will not. Why? He would not loose his audience. Why will he not? Glenn???? He has always said, “Speak truth boldly.” Heaven knows he has said things which could be construed as questionable by the drivebys. But this one subject is off limits. Why? I have never understood why this one topic emasculates them all. Are they afraid of a racial backlash? That is not a reason not to approach the truth? So why?


144 posted on 05/07/2012 10:02:33 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

I hear you, KB. The theater is growing thin on even the intended audience, however, since in order to enjoy it they’d need decent jobs. Obama’s wrecking-ball-to-the-economy approach has made it hard for even Moonbats to find his show amusing. If he’s going to have any real chance in Nov., there will have to be fraud on an order that would make Mugabe blush.


145 posted on 05/07/2012 10:09:19 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Lol. You’re very good w graphics. I was just remembering how Obama decorated the WH ‘holiday tree’ w a Chairman Mao ornament [though he quite assiduously avoided any ornaments to do w Jesus]. And then there was the Obama-on-Rushmore ornament, and one honoring some famous cross-dressing torchsong singer. A real all-American guy, that Obama. And very smart, too.

[Insert a thousand sarc tags here; one or two are just not enough.]


146 posted on 05/07/2012 10:16:24 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
"You’re very good w graphics."

It is indeed a super graphic. I can't take credit for it however; I just found it on Photobucket when I searched using the term "useful idiot."

147 posted on 05/07/2012 10:52:42 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I started listening to Rush in the late 80s when he was local in Sacramento. I would never listen to him now. Stopped years ago when he starting talking more about cigars and football than real important stuff.

Me too. Add to that his spending whole segments on his golf game.

148 posted on 05/07/2012 11:08:49 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; potlatch

Excellent graphic, Phil!

I heard that conversation, and Rush blew me away when he mentioned the CT SSN! HE brought it up!

Thank you, Rush!

And.......a very happy, happy birthday, Phil. ;o)

So good to “see” you, potlatch! I hope you are doing well.


149 posted on 05/07/2012 11:51:03 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

if I remember correctly, it was Chicago.


150 posted on 05/08/2012 2:09:53 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson