Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mockery Made of 9/11 Tribunal
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | May 7, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 05/07/2012 12:51:15 PM PDT by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: So a mockery was made of the first day of the military tribunal involving Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. An utter mockery. The first day was televised on closed-circuit so 9/11 families could watch the proceedings, and it was an utter disaster. The judge lost control. The defendants... I'll tell you, the decision to not have this trial in New York City looks brilliant now, based on what happened with the military tribunal the first day 'cause it was an absolute circus. The four defendants were making a mockery of the whole process, a mockery of the United States.

They were sneering and laughing at the deaths of all the people they killed on 9/11 and they expressed desire to do it again. One of the lawyers for one of the terrorists, a woman by the name of Cheryl Bormann (she's counsel for defendant Walid bin Attash), "attended the arraignment Saturday dressed in a hijab, apparently because her client insisted on it." She wore a burqa! She showed up looking like a woman out in public in Saudi Arabia. But it wasn't enough that she dress that way.

"She further requested that the court order other women to follow her example so that the defendants wouldn't have to avert their eyes 'for fear of committing a sin under their faith.'" It is a sin, apparently, for the murderers of 3,000 people to look at women's faces and heads uncovered. And it's such an outrage that the biased and unfair American military justice system would make these defendants look at women not wearing hijabs. So Cheryl Bormann requested of the court that every woman in the court...

There she is, Snerdley. You can see her right there on Fox. Fox has an artist's rendering of what happened. At a press conference Sunday at Club Gitmo, Cheryl Bormann said that she dresses in "a hijab at 'all times' when she meets with her client" out of respect for his beliefs. Asked why she requested other women to do the same, Cheryl Bormann said, "When you're on trial for your life, you need to be focused," and she can't have her clients not paying attention because there are women in the courtroom violating their religious beliefs.

So in a US military tribunal, we are to drop everything, and we are to respect Sharia law above all other law, even though these defendants are not being tried under Sharia law. We're supposed to mandate that Sharia law rule the courtroom, when such a demand made by any other religion would be laughed at. Bormann is not Muslim. Cheryl Bormann is not Muslim. She claimed "the issue of female attire came up several years ago when a paralegal wore 'very short skirts' and became a distraction for the defendants. She also said that on Saturday 'somebody' was dressed 'in a way that was not in keeping with my client’s religious beliefs.'"

Well, isn't that tough toenails for your client?

Everybody in this country goes someplace someday where their religious beliefs are offended, or challenged. I mean, do you believe that if members of any other religion walked into anything like this and demanded everybody either dress or behave according...? Especially if you're the defendant and you're on trial for your part in the murder of nearly 3,000 people! Cheryl Bormann said, "If because of someone’s religious beliefs, they can’t focus when somebody in the courtroom is dressed in a particular way, I feel it is incumbent upon myself as a [lawyer] to point that out and ask for some consideration from the prosecution. Suffice to say it was distracting to members of the accused."

"The clothing request was just one of several unusual moments during Saturday's lengthy and chaotic hearing." Cheryl Bormann dressed in her own hijab. And I'll tell you, the biggest outrage might be that the lawyers are now saying that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his buddies' trial could go on for years. Military tribunals are known for being "get in, get it, and get out" type affairs. They don't last very long. This hearing shoulda taken no more than two hours, if that.

This hearing should have been over and done with in two hours. Instead it lasted, do you know, almost 13 hours? This hearing lasted almost 13 hours! They had meal breaks. They had prayer breaks. The terrorists were making concerted efforts to stall the hearing. They knelt in prayer. They ignored the judge. They wouldn't listen to Arabic translations over their headsets. One of them even insisted on having the more than 20 pages detailing the charges against them read aloud. So they're making a mockery of the whole process, which is understandable.

It's predictable, too, which is why everybody was outraged by the idea that this trial should take place in an American criminal court in New York City, as Holder and Obama originated wanted -- and for this very reason, by the way. I've always been of the belief that Holder and Obama wanted America put on trial. And that's why they originally wanted it in New York City. You people who are new to the program, you may not be aware of this number, but just the security costs, had this trial gone ahead in New York City, as originally conceived...

Just the security costs alone were said to be $200 million. Just the security! Just to get the defendants in and out of court every day, keeping 'em alive wherever they were gonna be held, keeping them alive inside the courtroom. And everybody else's security to boot. Now, I'll tell you my reaction when I saw this, when I read about this. These guys, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his pals, do not strike me as prisoners who have been tortured or abused. If you've been successfully tortured or abused, you sorta sit there and cower.

And you're afraid to do anything that might cause a repeat of the treatment that you've been under. So these guys, I didn't see one shred of evidence that they'd been abused or tortured because they obviously have no fear of United States authority. They have no fear of the judge. They have no fear of these proceedings. They have no qualms whatsoever. They're behaving as though they know nothing is going to happen to them!

I'm just telling you: If they've been tortured like the American left and the media want you to believe, these people would be quiet, docile, sitting there trying to avoid doing anything that would cause a repeat of the torture or the abuse. And here they're inviting it! In any other court in any other country these guys are familiar with, they would have been beaten inside the courtroom and taken back to jail and the trial canceled. But here, even at our military tribunal in Club Gitmo, one of the female lawyers is demanding all the women in the courtroom wear burqas!

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/07/2012 12:51:16 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!


2 posted on 05/07/2012 12:53:21 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!

I might get flamed for saying this, but that's what FDR would have done during a war, and pretty darn quick. Bush, and now Obama, evidently would disagree with FDR.

3 posted on 05/07/2012 12:58:47 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The defense attorney should have been cited for contempt of court and sentenced to 30 days. By her saying that the court should order women to dress in burkas is the same as saying that the court itself was disrespectful.

How far we have fallen.


4 posted on 05/07/2012 1:01:45 PM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
They were sneering and laughing at the deaths of all the people they killed on 9/11 and they expressed desire to do it again>

That isn't making a mockery. It is a confession of guilt.

5 posted on 05/07/2012 1:02:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

She further requested that the court order other women to follow her example so that the defendants wouldn’t have to avert their eyes ‘for fear of committing a sin under their faith

maybe they should poke their own eyes out then


6 posted on 05/07/2012 1:03:18 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At the time Obama proposed holding this trial in NY City, I thought

1) who the hell is advising him?

2) please, please, please - go ahead with the idea! It would cause an open, festering PR puss-sore for Obama which would remind Americans daily what a total ass he is.


7 posted on 05/07/2012 1:06:53 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Castrate them with a shotgun, so they can’t enjoy their 72 virgins, and then disembowel the bastards. Why waste any more money on a trial? For once save the taxpayers some money!


8 posted on 05/07/2012 1:08:31 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Blindfold them.


9 posted on 05/07/2012 1:09:46 PM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Not all the way......just enough for them to bleed out. Maybe they’ll see a glimmer of the hell they’re going to before it’s all over. Now THAT would be justice!!


10 posted on 05/07/2012 1:15:58 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They didn’t seem to think that their heroes that drove planes into buildings were sinners for going to strip clubs and getting lap dances. Porn and murder is ok but looking at a woman that is not covered from head to toe is a sin.


11 posted on 05/07/2012 1:22:29 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Just lop their friggin’ heads, say “whoops,” and be done with it!

Way too quick, think Daniel Pearl and try to visualize what he went through. Use a dull kitchen knife.

Terror is the only thing a terrorist respects so let him have what he wants. Feet first into an industrial shredder one at a time (with a pig for company) and save the "mastermind" for last. No virgins for you.

Regards,
GtG

12 posted on 05/07/2012 1:32:34 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The whole world laughs at us. Guess who could care less?


13 posted on 05/07/2012 1:33:01 PM PDT by oyez ( Yomomacare going done once, going down twice, going---..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

THEY SHOULD NOT EVEN BE IN COURT.
Until the war on terror is over.
Should be no trials until the war is over.
They are ‘illegal enemy combatants’, and
should be dealt with afterwards, like
the war criminals after WW2.

Now if their side never stops their war,
so be it, the bastards will die in gitmo.
That is way international law has worked.Ed


14 posted on 05/07/2012 1:37:38 PM PDT by hubel458
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oyez

That arrogant, lazy, lying pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave of course. He is the one who made this country into a laughing stock in the whole world


15 posted on 05/07/2012 1:43:25 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Force-feed them bacon then hang them at the site of the Freedom Tower. Cut them down, cremate their bodies, and dump the ashes in the East River. Job done.

Screw their religion. As a Christian, how many places do I go per day where I could be offended and yet I’m expected to deal with it? Eff them.

}:-)4


16 posted on 05/07/2012 1:47:11 PM PDT by Moose4 ("Oderint dum metuant" -- "Let them hate, as long as they fear." (Lucius Accius, c. 130 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Don't give the 1600 Pennsylvania Ave resident all the credit. There are plenty so called american voters out to have him reelected.(Lower case “a” intentional.)
17 posted on 05/07/2012 1:59:31 PM PDT by oyez ( Yomomacare going done once, going down twice, going---..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I say for prison garb we dress them up in brilliant red, orange, and yellow.

I think "fire" can do this rather nicely.

18 posted on 05/07/2012 2:04:32 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The judge is the primary person at fault for losing control of the court room. Here's what a good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you reject human freedom and support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances.
19 posted on 05/07/2012 2:57:54 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the judge is at fault for losing control. A good judge would have said: I am the person and the only person who decide what is appropriate behavior in this court room. I see no one immodestly dressed, although I am VERY DEEPLY offended by yours, Ms. so-and-so. Your burqa suggests you support a totalitarian society where the majority of women and children of both sexes are routinely raped, denied their most basic human rights, even the right to dress as they please, and treated like property. I will NOT be lectured by the defendants or by you on their behalf. Regarding conduct: I will NOT tolerate the hostile behavior your clients have already engaged in. Sitting in this court room is a privilege accorded in a free society. The defendants will get a fair trial despite their attempts to thwart justice, but they will NOT be allowed to disrupt the process. They have to earn the privilege of attending this trial by being polite and attentive. If the defendants fail to listen quietly and attentively, they will be escorted out of this courtroom.
The very next rude behavior by any of the defendants will result in their removal.
(And the judge should enforce that.) This has been done by other judges in similar circumstances


20 posted on 05/07/2012 3:01:28 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Man, I just keep hoping that’s her way to try and get women to dress as promiscuously as possible without her clients being able to accuse her of doing so, so that they get to hire another lawyer in her place and make it stretch out longer.

I know it probably isn’t but I keep hoping!


21 posted on 05/07/2012 4:00:57 PM PDT by lymelady (Pro-life: Because I passed biology and history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson