Skip to comments.Was Steve Schmidt Qualified to be McCain's Campaign Manager?
Posted on 05/07/2012 4:18:26 PM PDT by palin45potus
Was Steve Schmidt Qualified to Be McCains Campaign Manager?
by WHITNEY PITCHER
In a recent article at the National Review, John McCains failed 2008 campaign manager Steve Schmidt is quoted as saying it will be a very long time before questions about capability and preparedness are not a part of the process. The implication is that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was neither prepared nor capable to be vice president in the 2008 cycle, and that now hangs over the current vice presidential selection process.
In his comments about the VP selection process, Schmidt indicates a pretty simple concept-- capability and preparedness are characteristics that a presidential nominee would seek in his or her running mate. However, Schmidts comments indicate that the selection process and the entire campaign he was involved in during 2008 did not consider such factors, which leads one to ask, did Steve Schmidt have the capability and preparedness necessary to perform his role as campaign strategist?" In other words, let the vetting of Steve Schmidt begin.
The 42 year-old New Jersey natives campaign experience started with work for four failed state and national races during his mid to late twentiesranging from the Kentucky Attorney Generals race in 1995 to working as Communication Director for Lamar Alexanders 2000 presidential bid. He also managed failed Lt. Governor and Senatorial bids in California in 1998.
(Clicl link for more)
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I think he was qualified but then again, I am a huge Steve Schmidt fan.
Palin was every bit as prepared as this whiney little narcissist we have in that job now; and Biden, Biden, don’t get me started on that gaffer. He tied up rush hour traffic in Nashville today like you wouldn’t believe.
Steve Schmidt still does not get it. If if had not been for Palin on the ticket, Obama would have won a landslide.
Steve Schmidt reminds me of Dan Rather who still not get it.
why would anyone hire Steve or whats-her-name ever again?
They proved to be leakers and whiners who will sandbag you at the first sign of trouble.
A question nobody is asking.
I looked up the word putz and Steve Schmidt’s picture popped up.
When Woody was interviewed for Men's Health magazine he was asked: "Do you have any sympathy for the republicans now that you've played one?"
Harrelson: "F**k, no! Those people make me weep".
IMO, Steve and Woody should get a room.
here he is cozying up the MSNBC crowd ....judge this guy for yourself.....
You are perhaps thinking of Phillies great Mike Schmidt?
Steve Schmidt is a POS! End of story.
You have freep mail.
You’re a what??????????????? Better get back to Dummie Underground! So to you, McLame was a GREAT candidate and Steve Schmidt was a wunderkind at getting him........................defeated???? Dumbest comment yet on FR.
LOL. Yes, as a matter of fact I was a huge fan of his too. But I just wrote SuzyQue. Boy do I look like an idiot. Think I am in unfriendly territory?...but Mike Schmidt was great.
Why thank you kindly.
The go back to DU thing is really old. And rude. Disagree all you want. There is no need to be rude. People have different opinions. I do not insult them.
I thought he worked for Obama. This guy was worse than bad.
This cretin is as vile and unscrupulous as anyone on the left.
What lies and smears this cretin said about Sarah is unforgivable. He is only worthy of contempt.
It was refreshing to read the comments on the Breitbart article about Schmidt. The comments veered off and defended Sarah Palin. The comments were very good.
In my book, Steve Schmidt was a DemonRAT mole who has sabataged every campaign he has touched. From the article:
“The 42 year-old New Jersey natives campaign experience started with work for four failed state and national races during his mid to late twentiesranging from the Kentucky Attorney Generals race in 1995 to working as Communication Director for Lamar Alexanders 2000 presidential bid. He also managed failed Lt. Governor and Senatorial bids in California in 1998.”
I wouldn’t trust this SOB further than I could throw a stick. As far as I am concerned, Steve Schmidt deserves the FUSS acronym for causing (along with McCain in mental decline) Zer0 to get into office and destroy this nation.
McCain lost didn’t he? Next question.
Re the guy who “liked” Steve Schmidt. Dummy. You like “Mike Schmidt”, the former Philadelphia power-hitter. Remember, it is “Mike” not “Steve”.
There, all is good in the world.
Steve Schmidt is a POS! End of story.
“Steve Schmidt still does not get it. If if had not been for Palin on the ticket, Obama would have won a landslide.
Steve Schmidt reminds me of Dan Rather who still not get it.”
Exactly right. Steve Schmidt lives in a dream world. IMHO he is a fool.
Schmidt was all about himself. He's certainly not the the only "me first" political campaign "professional" looking ut for his own career first, but he did an awful job, especially ignoring Palin's many, many accomplishments in her short tenure in the Governor's office.
I'm hoping that was tongue in cheek or sarcasm?
As I did not note any /s tag at the end, I'm going out on a limb and suggest you put the crack pipe down and wait until you come down from your high before posting anything else to prove the ol' saw that it is better to stay quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and prove to one and all, you are.
A myriad of reasons, cookcountry. But they would not be well received and I understand that. I should not have posted. I am not asking anyone to agree with me. But I stand by my opinion. But I am not going to say anything that would suggest it is a free for all to pile on. Thank you for being kind in your question though. Have a good evening.
I have thought...for a looooong time...that he was a demonrat mole.
You have to expect a fair amount of blowback for your comment. Schmidt, I believe, brought in Nicole Wallace to handle Palin. That move alone is worth ridicule.
Fluke Steve Schmidt. ...sorta reminds me of that pedophile Scott Ritter.
He's lucky Todd Palin didn't just kick his ass.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I have no problem with you disagreeing with me. I know you have your own reasons and that is fine with me. I am certainly not going to insult you.
This takes place within the ranks of both parties, but it never ceases to amaze me how failed political operatives are still considered ‘experts’. Very very few are.
I don’t even consider all successful political operatives to be ‘experts. All too often their views change more frequently than the direction of the wind.
Show me a person whose core values haven’t changed in twenty years, and I’ll show you a guy I could most likely support.
That still leaves folks like Ayers and Dorn, but they’re not running for office either. Those they support sure are though, and any tie to these folks or people they are fellow travelers with, should be a disqualifier. Hense my inability to back McCain, Soros and Terresa Heinz Kerry’s business partner.
Schmidt/Wallace were yet more building blocks in my conclusion that the “GOP Establishment” is fully populated by closet libs, whose primary agenda is to sabotage any kind of genuine conservative/grassroots movement that could endanger the power of the big-government ruling elites of the DC beltway and its media handmaidens.
Well, that’s hardly fair to the rest of us. Raise our expectations of a rousing defense of a controversial figure, then run and hide when asked forthrightly to stand and deliver. Reminds me of those neighborhood kids who would sneak up to your door, ring the door bell, then run away as quick as they could. Highly aggravating. Oh well.
Schmidt is a POS Democrat who, in a sane world, would be fed to starving Kodiak bears.
You are either a relative of Schmidt’s or you are insane or you are a DUmmy.
Schmidt and Wallace did more to sabotage Palin and the Right than any dummy could have done. They WERE the inner circle. It was Schmidt’s and Wallace’s comments that made me demand a refund for my donation to the McCain campaign in 08.
A room with a bong.
This was disturbing, as the pundits, writers, and others that I trusted seemed to be much more perceptive than I, as they had her spotted as a fraud before she got off the plane, or that there seemed to be another agenda playing out before my eyes.
What we now call The Establishment seemed to have their poor opinion of her in very solid terms, very quickly. The evidence cited to bolster this opinion wandered from lines from a SNL skit, to 'a woman's place is in the home, caring for her family'. When they said she was uninformed, they did not offer, nor could I find evidence that this was true. When they said she was naive to the ways the real world worked, Both her words and her actions in Alaska belied that. So that brings me to the belief that I was being lied to. Why? Are these people all privy to what goes on 'behind the curtain?' A view that we commoners must be protected from? A view that Sarah doesn't have?
There have only been two ‘watershed’ situations in my lifetime that have truly contributed to my political/ideological direction. The first was with Reagan’s triumph over the Carter years, and the whole return to patriotism and common-sense conservatism, which totally solidified me as a Republican voter all these decades. The second was this ‘establishment-GOP’ backstabbing of Palin, who was the first figure in ages to come along and fully represent my views ideologically, politically, and culturally. And as a result, I basically now have a deep, intense distrust of the GOP. I’m nowhere near as willing to give my vote to some “R” candidate unless I’m entirely convinced of their conservatism. And, to be honest, I could bolt to a 3rd-party at the drop of a hat.
what a jerk...but I hope he keeps it up.
The more he does this the better everyone can see what the real problem was with that campaign.
You are wrong on all counts.
I do not have to defend Schmidt. And I did not run anywhere. Remember the old adage....Choose your battles wisely? There is not a thing I could say to change your mind nor you mine. We would both be wasting our keystrokes. You are entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine.
I am not a guy. Just sayin’
(Regardless of whom McCain’s running mate was, incidentally.)
Ha, then you are a mind reader too, for I have never expressed a thought about Schmidt, here or anywhere else. No, even better, you are a thought predictor, because Schmidt was utterly unknown to me before this thread. At least as far as I can recall. So here I am, the truly objective, uncommitted lurker, hoping to see a real contest and learn the truth in the process, and yes you did run away, howsoever much you may protest the charge. You tell me by this you lack confidence in the persuasive power of your arguments, or else that you believe in them, but are convinced we are nothing but barbarians incapable of appreciating the sophistication of your gossamer elocutions. You misjudge us. I for one truly desired to know both sides, and now I won’t. Regrettable.
Steve Schmidt isn’t qualified to manage your kid’s campaign for Student Council.
I apologize if you feel I misjudged you or anyone else. I simply know when I am certainly in the minority and I do choose my battles. It is not that I do not have confidence in my “persuasive powers.”....It is that I am not interested in persuading anyone to have the same opinion as I. I am very well aware...now..that most on this thread disagree with me. They have a right to their opinions. I am not one who tries to get people to agree with me. I have said before I have been married for 46 years to a yellow dog democrat. I do not try to persuade him to change his political beliefs. He is a smart man. I respect him and his opinions even when we disagree. I do appreciate your polite response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.