Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans try to block Obama's rifle rule
Houston Chronicle ^ | May 8, 2012 | Dan Freedman

Posted on 05/08/2012 7:09:57 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON - House Republicans, accusing President Barack Obama of waging a war on gun owners, plan to cut off funding for an rule requiring firearms dealers in border states to report multiple sales of certain rifles.

The matter has become a flash point on both sides of the national gun control divide, elevating the debate over the Second Amendment in an election year in which the president is struggling to win again in pro-gun swing states such as New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.

Obama has vowed to veto the House's plan to prohibit the government from enforcing the border-state reporting requirement, which is contained in a larger $51 billion spending package. House floor debate on the package began Tuesday amid sharp rhetoric from gun rights backers.

"The Obama administration fundamentally dislikes guns, and more importantly it distrusts gun owners," said Rep. Denny Rehberg, R-Mont., author of the de-funding provision. "They also know that a frontal assault on the Second Amendment would be political suicide, so instead they've sought to undermine gun rights more subtly."

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; atf; banglist; batfe; bhofascism; democrats; executiveorders; guncontrol; nobama2012; obama; shallnotbeinfringed; tyranny

1 posted on 05/08/2012 7:10:06 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The deal is the government itself engaged in gunrunning on the border ~ most likely to gin up statistics to justify (in their minds if nowhere else) this particular rule.

I find it difficult to believe the Obots are actually pushing for this rule given what we know about Fast and Furious and all the dead bodies our tax dollars paid for. They must be insane.

2 posted on 05/08/2012 7:21:59 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It angers me that the feds single out 4 states for “special laws”.
It also angers me that folks in the remaining 46 states think that’s just fine.


3 posted on 05/08/2012 8:24:50 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Mases Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Free ThinkerNY

And not a single mention of Fast & Furious , the impetus for this new regulation.
If the Repubs don’t make F&F the top issue, first thing in the morning, every day until the election then they have no intention of winning.
We can then leave by the side of the road and move on.


5 posted on 05/09/2012 12:34:07 AM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

We can then leave by the side of the road and move on.=We can then leave them by the side of the road and move on.


6 posted on 05/09/2012 12:37:02 AM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Seems the Obama administration wants to stop Americans from being as armed as the cartels that they worked “under the radar” to arm during the Fast and Furious episode. Can’t have Americans with the means to actually defend themselves now can we?


7 posted on 05/09/2012 3:05:32 AM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onevoter

I’m still trying to figure out how the hell the ATF has any arbitrary authority to change firearms laws for only the people on border states buying multiple rifles of any kind. I think the FFL holding dealers need to band together and throw this to the Supreme Court. First off, a federal bureacrat doesn’t write legislation, plus I don’t know how the laws can be enforced differently due to where you reside.


8 posted on 05/09/2012 6:56:40 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Thank you. I thought the same thing too.


9 posted on 05/09/2012 8:14:37 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mylife; muawiyah; Free ThinkerNY

“...It also angers me that folks in the remaining 46 states think that’s just fine...”

We don’t. They mess with one of us, they mess with ALL of us.

Here’s a little something else the assh*les are trying, also flying under the radar:

The Trayvon Amendment - to a Commerce bill.

Free ThinkerNY - you may want to post this link too so it can some exposure...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/8/house-vote-trayvon-amendment/


10 posted on 05/09/2012 8:45:19 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Firearms purchasers in border states should conduct their transactions in Spanish; that way the FFL will report the buyer running guns to the cartels and their will be no further reporting requirement.


11 posted on 05/09/2012 12:24:50 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

House is powerless.

Obama and hillary are working to abolish the second amendment (not hyperbole) via international treaty.

http://www.dickmorris.com/obamas-secret-gun-control-plan-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/

A lame duck senate would do this in a heartbeat.


12 posted on 05/09/2012 12:38:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
If the Repubs don’t make F&F the top issue, first thing in the morning, every day until the election then they have no intention of winning.

I'm afraid they are not serious. If they were, Holder would have been impeached already, and we'd be gearing up for a Senate trial this summer, and forcing the vulnerable Senate 'Rats to line up solidly behind the anti-gun Holder and his felonies.

No, I think the game this year by the RNC is to protect Obama in order to make sure Obamacare can't be repealed. The objective is to kill off employer-paid healthcare, and the RNC high command needs Obamacare to do it, and the 'Rats to take the blame. Otherwise the white heat on welshing employers will be totally unbearable, and some of them might actually get kicked off the continent: as in, "don't come back, and don't try to sell or do business here". Something like that -- a fierce lashing-out. This way, the employers get well, the employees eat hard rock for a while, but the employers have to get well, period, end of sentence, paragraph, and subject. That is their be-all and end-all, I think (MHO).

13 posted on 05/09/2012 1:44:18 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Yeah, its a HUGE conspiracy!!!! And don't forget the Build-A-Burgers and the Illuminati!!!!

Just admit you have no idea how government works. Its less embarrassing.

14 posted on 05/09/2012 1:52:38 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Deb
You again. Buy a brain since last time?

Just the Business Roundtable doing business as usual. You got a problem with that? Take it up with Boehner, if he's in a good mood he might pat you on the head and explain why all the mommies and daddies have to lose their health and pension plans, so American companies can have the Third World cost structures they need to be "competitive" with Third World companies operating in Third World environments.

Run along now, honey.

15 posted on 05/09/2012 2:00:47 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

There was no need for this law in the first place. Every gun sold by a FFL. Is called into the atf prior to being sold. Then atf conducts a background check. And then advises the FFL to allow the customer to buy the rifle. Which part of shall not infringe does this is this?


16 posted on 05/10/2012 5:57:42 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

nowhere in the article does it offer a definition of a “high powered” rifle. Is a 7.62 x 54 romak? is a .223 with a drum magazine a “high powered” rifle?
Is a bolt action .338 a “high powered” rifle?


17 posted on 05/10/2012 6:06:00 AM PDT by newnhdad (Where will you be during the Election Riots of 2012/2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad
.....a “high powered” rifle....

A single-shot .22 rifle with a black plastic stock, a fake Picatinny Rail and a pistol grip?

The feared AK-47 is also a "high-powered" rifle, although each shot is only about as "powerful" as Gramp's 30-30. A bolt-action .338, particularly if it has a wooden stock, does not seem to excite the gun grabbers quite as much.

"The Obama administration fundamentally dislikes guns, and more importantly it distrusts gun owners,"

Life would be easier if all Communists were stupid. Team Obama distrusts gun owners because they ain't stupid.

18 posted on 05/10/2012 7:46:09 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (So, Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson