Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I’m not anti-Palin at all, just observing that she is building a like-minded woman coalition. Nothing wrong with that.


20 posted on 05/09/2012 9:55:49 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: wolfman23601

The Mourdock thing was a triumph for her. Mourdock was only slightly ahead of Lugar. Once she announced her support, the TEA money flooded into that race and an Establishment SuperPAC pulled out. Lugar’s position collapsed.

Downticket Republicans know that a Palin endorsement is a lot more valuable than anything from Romney or Santorum. Given Burkmans baggage, I would not be surprised to see Palin’s choice start to go even or pull ahead over the next week.

In an era of complete phonies, Palin’s authenticity is golden.

Best,

Chris


23 posted on 05/09/2012 10:12:46 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: wolfman23601

No, you are wrong in your claim that she endorses candidates because of their sex, that is what we had to argue with in 2010 with the moderates and Romneybots.


25 posted on 05/09/2012 10:13:28 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson