Skip to comments.White House: Abortion OK, But Visitors Must Register Unborn Children
Posted on 05/09/2012 12:35:58 PM PDT by cpforlife.org
The Obama administration is plenty content with legalized abortion and funding abortions with taxpayer funds, but when it comes to Americans visiting the White House, they must register their unborn children when they check in at the front door.
The Director of the White House Visitors Office, Ellie Shafer, today distributed an email newsletter to members of Congress and others providing detailed instructions on how to register an unborn child (a baby that has not yet been born, as Shafer puts it) into the security system the White House uses to arrange group tours.
We have received a number of calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet been born, Shafer wrote. Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. Its an easy process.
According to the National Right to Life Committee, which obtained a copy of the newsletter, the White House spells out how the babys security information should be entered into the White House system. Staff must include such details as the babys sex, if known.
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as well ask you to update it at the time of birth, the instructions say. All of the information should be updated once, the baby is born, the newsletter instructs.
Douglas Johnson, National Right to Lifes legislative director, commented on the juxtaposition between the White House visitor log policy and its abortion policy.
It is ironic that President Obamas staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth, he told LifeNews.
Notably, the newsletter provides no guidance on what the staff should do if an unborn baby is first registered for security purposes, but then aborted, Johnson added. On May 17, the House Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee plans to hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would generally prohibit abortion in the sixth month and later in the District. If the President wants to provide for the security of the unborn child immediately outside of the White House gates, as well as inside, he should endorse this bill.
The full email appears below:
We have received a number of calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet been born.
Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. Its an easy process.
LAST NAME: The familys last name FIRST NAME: Baby as a first name MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as well ask you to update it at the time of birth SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zeros (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!) CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parents
White House visitor logs released in 2010 revealed President Barack Obama invited Nancy Keenan, the head of the pro-abortion group NARAL for one of the Christmas parties it hosted on December 14.
Obama gave Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards frequent access as well. The logs show the head of the nations premier abortion business visited the White House and spent time with Obama administration officials on four occasions.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
"It is the duty of every patriot to protect his country from its government"
It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.
—Yet another instance of Winning the Future, or WTF?
Ha, even the unborn are a threat to the dark lord.
Well that makes a little sense as his birth place still remains a mystery and the wrong location could mean expulsion from the people’s house.
Funny to see the ruling elite so paranoid.
I wonder, under the new law, if the baby kicks would the SS file felony charges against him or her?
Why the “but” in the title?
They’re simply acknowledging that the “fetus” is a human being and that it’s OK to kill that human being.
After all, 0bama refused to vote for an anti-infanticide bill.
Kill them babies if you want to, but if you bring them here first...
Click here to watch a 1-minute
Ultrasound commercial on YouTube.
Make sure your speakers are on.
You must give them jihadists credit for coming up with innovative solutions: unborn suicide bombers! But, don’t you worry your pretty little head, they won’t make it through the WH Security!!!
In case Emperor Hussein I decides to invoke forced or "post birth" abortions.
This system is set up so that if you are expecting, and planning to visit the WH after you deliver, your newborn will already be in the system.
So if you are 7 months along and planning a visit in three months, you fill out the register your baby form so when you get there, all three of you can get in.
So, the tourist mom is supposed to notify the White Hut after the baby is born.
The left is recognizing that a fetus is an unborn human being and in reality abortion is a homicide
This is really going to screw up a kid’s future.
Kid goes to some gov’t office or an airport. Shows ID. Clerk goes through the database and a siren goes off. Kid is arrested for BC or ID forgery.
Why a forgery? Because there is a record of the kid’s activity before it was born.
Kid will curse his parents for visiting the white hut.
Somehow, I feel that in the near future, the new birth date will be the date of conception.
Maybe aug 4, 1961 is obama’s date of conception.
Are they starting to condition people to register their unborn babies in anticipation of a one child only policy, or maybe a policy where you must register and be approved in order to have a child? This makes absolutely no other sense, unless they are just plain nuts. Don’t they have to have some kind of respectable reason before they can decide to implement new rules for such things?
This is so insane it has to be satire that somehow didn’t get flagged as satire...
Otherwise, how can they justify abortion, with this giant sized admission the unborn are human too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.