Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee for Veep? (editorial)
National Review ^ | May 9, 2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 05/09/2012 5:50:59 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

The conventional wisdom about Mitt Romney’s vice-presidential short list, according to a handful of Romney insiders, may be wrong. Instead of picking a straitlaced Midwestern senator such as Ohio’s Rob Portman, or an outspoken northeastern Republican governor such as Chris Christie, there is a chance Romney will tap an evangelical from the South.

And the name on the lips of Romney friends and supporters isn’t a rising southern senator or a current Dixie governor. He has been out of office for five years, resides on a beach in the Florida panhandle, and hosts a television show.

In other words, Mike Huckabee, the bass-guitar-playing former governor.

Yes, according to several sources close to the Romney campaign, who insisted on anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the vice-presidential search, the 56-year-old Arkansan may be included in the veep mix.

To many Republicans, a ticket with a Mormon bishop and a Baptist preacher isn’t far-fetched. “In a way, it’s almost a dream ticket,” says Ed Rollins, the chairman of Huckabee’s 2008 presidential campaign. “He’s substantive and knows domestic policy, and his personality wouldn’t overshadow Romney’s.”

For now, it isn’t clear whether Huckabee is going to be vetted, or that he’s anywhere near Romney’s short list. But he is, at the very least, being discussed. As one Romney ally puts it, tapping Huckabee would energize tea-party conservatives, evangelicals, and related voters who soured on Romney during the GOP primaries. He’s also not a sweat-inducing pick, since he was vetted by the Beltway press during his presidential run four years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: 2012veep; christianvote; evangelicals; huckabee2012

1 posted on 05/09/2012 5:51:01 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

GAAAHHH! Please, NO! Why choose such a loser?


2 posted on 05/09/2012 5:53:28 PM PDT by madison10 (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; ...

Mike Huckabee has charm and celebrity. But he’s missing one essential element, which is credibility with conservatives. A socially conservative, Nanny State lite ex-Governor would not compliment Mitt Romney.


3 posted on 05/09/2012 5:53:42 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The huckster for VP?What a rotten idea.


4 posted on 05/09/2012 5:54:11 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Nah.


5 posted on 05/09/2012 5:54:33 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Oh please no. Do they really want to lose that bad?


6 posted on 05/09/2012 5:54:40 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

It figgers Romney would think Huck would appeal to the right.


7 posted on 05/09/2012 5:56:56 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Huckabee and McCain colluded in 2008 to keep Romney from getting any momentum.

I doubt Romney would even have Huckabee on the long list. Huckabee doesn’t bring anything to the ticket.


8 posted on 05/09/2012 5:59:36 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
No.

He is an anti-smoking and food Nazi.

9 posted on 05/09/2012 6:03:28 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

The Huckster was responsible for the GOP nominating McLsme instead of Romney in the prev election-—remember he gave McLame his votes in WV to keep Romney from winning? It was all downhill from there with the media. I don’t think Romney has forgotten. Romney would have run a much better race against Zero than that useless turd.


10 posted on 05/09/2012 6:04:18 PM PDT by RightLady (Throw the Traitors out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

ROTFLMAO Huckabee............hahahahahahh


11 posted on 05/09/2012 6:07:27 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

If Ed Rollins likes it.....it must be a bad idea....

The guy is scum....


12 posted on 05/09/2012 6:09:25 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Huckabee is one of those people that if you see them in short doses, and at infrequent intervals, can sound really good.

But once you start to see and hear him too often, all that good feeling starts to go away. His luster wears off real quickly.


13 posted on 05/09/2012 6:18:15 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued


Romney already has Fox News in the tank.

Maybe Fox would like to dump Huckabee......LOL.


14 posted on 05/09/2012 6:22:37 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Just what we need: Romnuckaney!

For the love of all that is good and pure, please Lord, smack the convention delegates upside the head. Cause them to be blinded to Romnuckaney. May the power of your loving Hand cause them to shout in unison, “PALIN!”

Amen.


15 posted on 05/09/2012 6:28:30 PM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark3681
mutiny3a
16 posted on 05/09/2012 6:32:16 PM PDT by TheRobb7 (Remember, JimRob called a truce....not a surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Nooo, I want a nice steak dinner and all I'm getting is re-heated porridge.

17 posted on 05/09/2012 6:37:16 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Oh, please, no. For the LOVE OF GOD, please no....


18 posted on 05/09/2012 6:46:03 PM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Sounds great to me. I’d hate it if someone I thought highly of hitched his wagon to the Romney campaign. Since my opinion of Huck isn’t all that high, this works out just fine.


19 posted on 05/09/2012 6:48:07 PM PDT by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risen_feenix

Pick Rubio and get it over already.


20 posted on 05/09/2012 6:54:35 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Would you rather eat dog food or cat food? Guess it's Romney 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Ah, wait! Since we’re not going to vote for the Bishop, what do we care?! Understand what I be sayin, grrrrl?


21 posted on 05/09/2012 6:56:53 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Arghh! No! No!

At least the dog looks good.

22 posted on 05/09/2012 7:08:08 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Please!!! One suckass phony Rino on the ticket is quite enough already, thank you.


23 posted on 05/09/2012 7:08:28 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“It figgers Romney would think Huck would appeal to the right.”

Yup. The Bishop’s ‘cheesy grits’ must be repeating on him.


24 posted on 05/09/2012 7:16:04 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Obama's record is an open charnel pit. Romney's too, but under a whitened sepulchre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madison10

“GAAAHHH! Please, NO! Why choose such a loser?”

Me Too. He’s not even a real Conservative, they think southerners are stupid, Romney can’t win without the South and they think all the southerners will get all enthusiastic because of Huck and have huge turnout helping Romney carry some of the states obama carried last time. I want a CONSERVATIVE ticket, President and Vice President. I’ve lived in and worked in the South all my life and I want a Conservative, if they happen to be southern that’s a bonus. The greatest insult I’ve suffered in my life was from an Indiana brother-in-law who thought I would vote for Carter because he was a southerner.


25 posted on 05/09/2012 7:16:57 PM PDT by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The Romneybots’ blood pressure would spray out their ears.


26 posted on 05/09/2012 7:17:58 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This sounds like Politico's latest brainwave.

Hey, if not Huckabee, why not dredge up Trent Lott? He's like sort of a Republican, and he could like sort of deliver the south.

27 posted on 05/09/2012 7:29:47 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think Huckabee could well compliment Romney—about his hair, his persistence, his beautiful wife, etc. But Huckabee just wouldn’t *complement* Romney on the ticket. : )


28 posted on 05/09/2012 7:30:09 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Romney and Huckabee.

That's about as exciting as a rice-cake and a glass of water.

29 posted on 05/09/2012 7:45:41 PM PDT by Washi (Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Not THIS TEA Party voter. Lord save us from these imbeciles.


30 posted on 05/09/2012 8:40:28 PM PDT by publana (Beware the olive branch extended by a Dem for it disguises a clenched fist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

HUCKABEE?

Gag me with a spork. A spork jammed into a whole, uncooked russet potato.


31 posted on 05/09/2012 8:42:58 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

No Theocrats wanted...No Indian fake conservatives.


32 posted on 05/09/2012 8:49:23 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

NO. just no.

Good grief, who comes up with this crap.


33 posted on 05/09/2012 8:52:45 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


34 posted on 05/09/2012 8:54:32 PM PDT by correctthought ("Obamunism is a temporary setback on the road to freedom" - Liberty Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightLady

I was glad Huckabee stopped Romney from winning last election and wish Huckabee would have won over McCain or Romney. Except for the fact that McCain gave us a wise choice with Sarah Palin. I would prefer Huckabee now over Romney. But for VP, Rubio or Col. West would be the best pick.


35 posted on 05/09/2012 9:51:06 PM PDT by make no mistake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I doubt it matters who wins this election. A lot of us forget just how bad the situation looked for our survival as a nation before Obama, or Obamacare, were even heard of. Obama has just sped up the downfall of our nation with more blatant, and obvious resentment of everything our nation was founded on. I don't even know what the best outcome in this election would be. A lot of people are going to forget about how bad our problems were before Obama if we elect Romney, and going back to the status-quo isn't enough to save the country. It just gets us moving in the wrong direction at a slower speed. We have been on the wrong track for decades now, and we have shown no ability to even stop it. We can't reverse what we can't even stop. It's going to take something big to have any positive change.

If a Romney victory makes too many people relax it's pointless in the long run. Just like it's pointless if we accept another term of Obama, and his obviously unconstitutional actions that don't require a Judges decision to be seen for what they are. There are some real debatable Constitutional arguments about many issues, but there are just as many that are obvious to everyone, including those who disagree with them and are trying to bypass them. Elections aren't going to get us much further when we are always on the defensive over things like Obamacare that weren't even a problem a few years ago when everyone could see exactly where we were headed.

I don't know how much an ideal Conservative President who was willing to do anything to restore the Constitution could do at this point. Romney will take us in the wrong direction at a slower speed than Obama, but if Obama can make things come to a conclusion in a shorter period of time then let him. Everything shows we are headed for the end of our unity as a nation regardless of who we elect on a federal level, and I would rather that end just come sooner than later, because later isn't that far off.

States are the only answer when it comes to saving themselves, and taking back the Constitutional rights that have been stolen from them. They have to stand up in absolute defiance to the federal government on certain issues, and while this isn't the same times as our first civil war, I see it as an end to our United States. The best outcome would be a loosely United 50 States with a small federal government sat up for the obvious reasons needed, and solely intended for, but does anyone seriously see that happening? It's time for a new Union of States ready to see a Constitution based on our original written and respected, because it's too far gone to save a nation that doesn't even want to be saved by a large portion of it's people. A simple thing like a much broader education of the people on our Constitution and political system might have been able to save us at a much earlier point, but not now. The only ones who know anything about our Constitution anymore are those self taught out of personal interest to uphold it, or those interested in finding ways around it. The average person we always encourage to vote don't know a damn thing about it, and they don't care to know.

36 posted on 05/09/2012 10:10:48 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (Succession of the more Conservative States and formation of a new Union should be our goal now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; All; Antoninus; Lazlo in PA; writer33; napscoordinator; cripplecreek; ...
Look, I know most Freepers don't like Huckabee now and didn't like him in 2008. I'm the minority here because I voted for Huckabee four years ago since I thought he was better than McCain or Romney.

Iowa conservative activists and others in 2011 showed pretty consistently that they still liked Huckabee and wished he was a candidate. Many of those people eventually became Santorum supporters. It would be a mistake to dismiss the potential power of a Huckabee candidacy — at the very minimum I think this is a trial balloon, and it's a whole lot better than some of what we've been hearing of Romney's plans to “move to the middle.” If he's going to move, I'd much rather see him move toward Southern populism of the old evangelical model than move toward east coast secular liberalism.

I have no way of knowing if Huckabee is being seriously considered by Romney. Unfortunately, the things I don't like about Huckabee are quite possibly the things Romney likes the most, so I don't think we can dismiss this option. Personally, since I believe Romney will lose this fall, I'd rather not see Huckabee get drawn into a losing ticket — but that's just me.

While Huckabee is going to draw criticism from economic conservatives if selected as vice president, Huckabee’s core support comes from the Christian conservative movement. That's the main group which is organized well enough to torpedo Romney's election, and therefore poses the greatest threat to Romney. He also comes with some significant advantages in the more “populist” wings of former Democratic Party voters who have gravitated into the Republican camp in the South and the industrial states. Attacks against Huckabee as a so-called “Christian socialist” could effectively blunt the attacks on Romney as a corporate raider who doesn't understand the working poor.

Those of us who believe executive experience is important also should not minimize the potential effects of having two former governors on the ticket (Romney and Huckabee) compared to two former senators (Obama and Biden).

I hope Huckabee doesn't get offered the vice presidency, and if offered I hope he doesn't take it (though we'll never know for sure if he turns it down). I'd much rather see Huckabee run in 2016 without the baggage of a 2012 defeat.

On the other hand, at least this trial balloon shows Romney is beginning to take conservative concerns seriously.

37 posted on 05/09/2012 10:14:12 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Two wrongs don’t make a right. That’s what I always say.


38 posted on 05/09/2012 10:14:13 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I just threw up a little in my mouth.


39 posted on 05/09/2012 10:15:46 PM PDT by Redcloak (Mitt Romney: Puttin' the "Country club" back in "Republican".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Huckster is the Southern-fried Willard. An EPIC FAIL ticket if there ever was one.


40 posted on 05/09/2012 10:50:50 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Romney/Huckabee.

This is like a bad dream.

41 posted on 05/09/2012 11:20:31 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark3681
Excellent prayer:

For the love of all that is good and pure, please Lord, smack the convention delegates upside the head. Cause them to be blinded to Romnuckaney. May the power of your loving Hand cause them to shout in unison, “PALIN!” Amen.

42 posted on 05/09/2012 11:22:20 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I doubt Huckabee's on the short list. As someone else noted, there's too much bad blood between them after 2008, and I think Romney's unlikely to pick another Governor (which is why Martinez and others have probably moved down the list)

He'd certainly shore up Romney's lack of socially conservative credentials, but Obama's not going to win the Bible Belt regardless, and I can think of better running mates. I don't think Huckabee's record on fiscal issues is all that "liberal" (just like Christie's record on social issues isn't all that "liberal"... real "social liberals" in NJ hate Christie and the "rich should pay their fair share" folks in Arkansas hated Huckabee when he was in office for mocking their agenda). But in both cases, it's all about perception and plenty of conservatives are convinced they're Satan and would scream bloody murder 'til election day.

Huckabee would be preferable to a Fontano-type and a disastrous pick like Rice, but there are better choices available and Romney will probably look elsewhere.

43 posted on 05/10/2012 12:07:27 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I would think this comes down to electoral politics. If Romney gets the nomination he will need a VP candidate who can help carry one of the big swing states. If he thinks he can win FL without Rubio he will try to get someone who can help move PA, OH or maybe MI into his column.


44 posted on 05/10/2012 12:16:48 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Huckabee for Veep?

That way we have have TWO, TWO STATISTS for the price of one!

That would give me just one more reason to vote for Virgil Goode.

45 posted on 05/10/2012 8:11:41 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA

AHAHAHAHAHA.

Huck should be made Ambassador to some far off land.


46 posted on 05/10/2012 8:19:16 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Impy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy

He could be named Ambassador to Deep-Fried Cotton Candy Land.


47 posted on 05/10/2012 8:23:11 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The stench of Earth Pimp-age is permeating over the internet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA; Impy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy

For the sake of his health if should be Ethiopia. We wouldn’t want him to get obese again.


48 posted on 05/10/2012 8:50:37 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

49 posted on 05/10/2012 8:52:51 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy

Aww man, you ruined my strategy!!!


50 posted on 05/10/2012 8:58:39 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The stench of Earth Pimp-age is permeating over the internet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson