Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona high school forfeits championship game rather than face girl opponent
Fox News ^ | 5-10-2012 | Joshua Rhett Miller

Posted on 05/10/2012 1:11:45 PM PDT by servo1969

A state championship high school baseball game is over before tonight's first pitch, after one Arizona team forfeited rather than play an opponent with a girl in the lineup.

Our Lady of Sorrows refused to play Mesa Preparatory Academy in Thursday’s scheduled Arizona Charter Athletic Association state championship game, because that team has Paige Sultzbach at second base. The 15-year-old agreed to sit out a pair of regular season victories over Our Lady of Sorrows, which is run by the Society of St. Pius X, an traditionalist church that broke away from Roman Catholic Church over Vatican reforms in 1970. But with everything on the line tonight, Sultzbach wasn't willing to stay glued to the bench — even if it means no game at all.

-snip-

In a statement to FoxNews.com, an Our Lady of Sorrows official said the school had no choice but to forfeit because it has a strict policy prohibiting participation in co-ed athletics and believes in "forming and educating boys and girls" separately.

“Teaching our boys to treat ladies with deference, we choose not to place them in an athletic competition where proper boundaries can only be respected with difficulty,” the statement read. "Our school aims to instill in our boys a profound respect for women and girls."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: arizona; baseball; championship; girl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2012 1:11:46 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Wimps. Scared of a girl. My son had play against a girl playing wide receiver in football. He knocked her down on a play. He asked if he did anything wrong. I told him “That’s why she’s out there”.


2 posted on 05/10/2012 1:13:55 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

What are they, Muzzies?


3 posted on 05/10/2012 1:14:29 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

We had girls on my Little League, they were good, too.


4 posted on 05/10/2012 1:15:02 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

In other news, every future opponent of Our Lady of Sorrows high has added a female to their rosters....


5 posted on 05/10/2012 1:15:36 PM PDT by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

A wimp would be someone who compromised their moral beliefs to suit the needs of the moment. They stuck to their guns, even though it was costing them the championship. If that is ‘wimpy’, I can only hope that far more people will be wimpy in the future.


6 posted on 05/10/2012 1:17:16 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

She’s more man than they are. Play the game.


7 posted on 05/10/2012 1:18:54 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Wimps. Scared of a girl.

No. No more than the 90% of males in the 1950s and earlier who would have taken the same position. The most of girls of those eras would not have been too impressed with a girl playing on the boys team either.

You may not share those values, but it is disingenuous to try to taunt them into abandoning them.
8 posted on 05/10/2012 1:18:55 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I dunno, Appy. It sounds more like the school doesn’t want to compromise one of its core principles and would rather forfeit the game (ie, give the win to the other team) than do so.

Personally, I think it is silly to give up a championship over it but kudos to them for putting their money where their mouth is.


9 posted on 05/10/2012 1:19:10 PM PDT by RMDupree (I'm not really here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yeah, what’s the issue here again? Baseball is only very occasionally a contact sport.


10 posted on 05/10/2012 1:22:21 PM PDT by Goldsborough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

At least they stick to their principles, you have to give them that.


11 posted on 05/10/2012 1:23:50 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Chen Guangcheng: Gutsy call, Obama /UltraMegaDrippingSarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldsborough

It’s not like football, where you have to make special accommodations for a girl, I mean we’re not talking about “Quarterback Princess” here.

If the girls are good enough to make the team on their own merits, what’s the problem.


12 posted on 05/10/2012 1:23:58 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“A wimp would be someone who compromised their moral beliefs to suit the needs of the moment. They stuck to their guns, even though it was costing them the championship. If that is ‘wimpy’, I can only hope that far more people will be wimpy in the future.”

Bravo!


13 posted on 05/10/2012 1:24:38 PM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I understand that line of thinking, I just think there are better hills to die on.


14 posted on 05/10/2012 1:25:28 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goldsborough

That’s what I thought. Now the girls that want to be high school wrestlers is another matter...


15 posted on 05/10/2012 1:26:08 PM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
This seems silly to me. I totally agree when boy wrestlers refuse to wrestle girls, as that involves a great deal of close, physical contact, that is inappropriate, IMO. I could understand not playing against a girl in a sport like basketball, as well, though I'd probably be OK if my son played against one.

But, baseball? There is very, little, physical contact and it would almost never be awkward, much less inappropriate.

Do they allow the boys to play chess or golf against girls?

16 posted on 05/10/2012 1:26:46 PM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (The candidate I vote for will NOT have a CARE after his name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Teaching our boys to treat ladies with deference, we choose not to place them in an athletic competition where proper boundaries can only be respected with difficulty.

It's baseball you idiots. Have you never played a co-ed softball or kickball game?

My wife and I play in a co-ed social sports volleyball league, and it's a blast. There's probably more contact in that than in high school baseball.

These are people taking pride in artificial virtue.

17 posted on 05/10/2012 1:27:17 PM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions anonymus by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The conference they play in allows boys and girls on the field. They already played twice in the season, and the boy/girl team won both times[lady sat on the bench].

If the school already knows there is a chance of facing a girl in competition, why then put the team's chance in jeopardy by playing in a boy/girl conference?

18 posted on 05/10/2012 1:28:35 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

This has nothing to do with excellence in women athletes. it is all about radical egalitarianism—Marxist ideology that is trying to destroy the Laws of Nature and the Constitution which is based on Objective Truth—that males and females have different natures and need to be admired and respected for their very natures. it dehumanizes both men and women and destroys respect and dignity of the sexes.

Women, by nature, are nurturers—designed by God to have babies and make them emotionally healthy so they will flourish. Men were designed to protect the family and provide for the woman so she could care for the babies. For thousands of years, women and children did not make it if there was no man to champion them.

Marx hates patriarchy and needs to eliminate men who protect their families. It destroys children. Children who grow up with no caring father end up in prison or in gangs. 95% of all prisoners in the 1980’s had abusive or no fathers while growing up.

Marx knew to destroy the family they have to pit man against women—just like class and race warfare—there is a sexes one too—as well as parents against children-—classic socialist use to destroy all trust in a people.

Whittaker Chambers explains the lack of Trust in Communism—in families.

Having men compete against women conditions them to hurt women—which used to be unmanly and evil until this Marxist push to make women into men and force them into the workplace so children’s minds can be shaped by the State and strangers. (70’s is when this sick idea took root. Marxists renamed Daycare to “preschool” to think children would be smarter being around other two year olds to learn speech and good manners. It is a joke and was the beginning of mass dumbing down although the socialist Dewey actually started in the 30’s with destroying morality and traditions.

When you are hurting women in sports—it is conditioning into a mindset that makes it acceptable. Christian Ethics can never condone men hurting women even in sports, because of the extreme difference in strength.

Marxists want women in combat to destroy the protective nature of men and destroy the nurturing aspect in women. Marx denied Natural Law Theory which is the basis of our legal system.


19 posted on 05/10/2012 1:32:57 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Yeah, I doubt that the people here applauding the move would say the same thing if it was a Muslim school (who would probably forfeit also).

Sticking to your guns is a really stupid thing to do if your guns are unloaded, or more appropriately, sticking to your principles makes no sense if your principles are stupid.

20 posted on 05/10/2012 1:36:22 PM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions anonymus by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson